SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Elbow”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Interposition arthroplasty of the elbow with rheumatoid arthritis.

Radiographic bone loss and clinical outcome were evaluated at a median of 6 years after interposition arthroplasty was performed in 35 elbows with rheumatoid arthritis. Seven early postoperative complications, two major and five minor, occurred. Three elbows subsequently required total elbow replacement. Clinical results were good in terms of pain relief but only fair in terms of joint mobility and stability. Radiographic elbow destruction progressed to a higher Larsen stage in half of the elbows. Measurements revealed humeral bone loss in two thirds of the elbows and ulnar bone loss in one third. In comparison with total elbow replacement, the long-term results of interposition arthroplasty were found to be inferior, with a total elbow replacement being required in one tenth of the elbows in the long term. In addition, bone loss often became extensive, making reoperation difficult or impossible. The authors recommend total elbow replacement as the first choice in the surgical treatment of the painful elbow with rheumatoid arthritis and cartilage destruction.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Resection of elbow ossification and continuous passive motion in postcomatose patients.

Heterotopic periarticular ossifications were surgically excised in 16 elbows of 14 traumatic brain injury patients an average of 18.9 months (range, 4-67 months) after the end of coma. In 11 elbows the ulnohumeral joint was ankylosed in a position that ranged from 0 degrees to 100 degrees of flexion (group 1); in 5 elbows the arc of flexion ranged from 10 degrees to 25 degrees (group 2). Full pronation and supination were present in 15 of the elbows; in 1 the radiocapitellar joint was fixed at 30 degrees of pronation by a partial ossification of the interosseous membrane. The arc of flexion attained after surgery averaged 115 degrees (range, 90 degrees to 145 degrees) in the group 1 elbows and 128 degrees (range, 115 degrees to 140 degrees) in the group 2 elbows. In an attempt to prevent postoperative loss of motion and recurrence of ossification, continuous passive motion was applied to the affected elbow for 6 weeks before starting a fully active rehabilitation program. All the patients were examined at regular intervals after the surgery. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 60 months (average, 30.7 months). During the follow-up period, all the elbows showed improvement in range of motion and the arc of flexion averaged 95 degrees (range, 30 degrees to 135 degrees) in the group 1 elbows and 116 degrees (range, 80 degrees to 145 degrees) in the group 2 elbows. Patients with poor neuromuscular control lost part of their postoperative range of motion and partial recurrence was observed in 3 elbows. We believe that our improved results, compared with those obtained by previous investigators, may have been due to the prolonged application of continuous passive motion after surgery.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Role of collateral ligaments in the GSB-linked total elbow prosthesis.

The GSB III elbow prosthesis is a loose-hinged type of elbow implant. The introduction of such hinged elbow arthroplasty expanded the indications for elbow replacement to patients with more deficient bone and ligaments. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics and stability of the GSB III elbow prosthesis with that of the normal elbow and to investigate the role of the collateral ligaments in the kinematics and the stability of the GSB III total elbow prosthesis in an in vitro model. The results could show a semiconstrained kinematic pattern of the GSB III implant. The mean laxity for varus/valgus stress of the implant without collateral ligament support was significantly greater for all flexion angles when compared with intact elbows (mean, 12.7 degrees versus 5.4 degrees ) and with elbows treated with a standard implantation technique (mean, 9.5 degrees ). The release of the collateral ligaments increased the already observed varus shift after standard implantation of a GSB III elbow prosthesis. The laxity measured without collateral ligaments during loaded movement reached the maximum varus/valgus laxity of the GSB III prosthesis of 12 degrees degrees. The study confirms the role of the collateral ligaments in stabilizing the GSB III elbow prosthesis. Missing collateral ligaments may overload the implant-cement-bone interface and may be one factor contributing to early aseptic loosening of this device.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

The GSB III elbow prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis: a 2- to 9-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The optimal design of an elbow prosthesis for badly damaged elbows is unkown. We evaluated 23 GSB III semi-constrained (sloppy-hinged) total elbow arthroplasties in 16 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a mean follow-up period of 5 (2-9) years, we assessed quality of the cementing technique, signs of aseptic loosening, patient satisfaction, range of movement, and determined the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) elbow score. 3 patients had died before follow-up; thus, 20 replacements in 16 patients were available for clinical and radiographic study. All patients had endstage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the elbow joint. RESULTS: In 2 patients, humeral components were revised due to malorientation. 1 arthroplasty was revised due to aseptic loosening of the humeral component. There were 4 cases of intraoperative fracture which healed uneventfully. The total rate of complications was thus one-third. In 17 of 40 components, the cementing technique was rated as marginal or inadequate. We found no association between cementing technique and loosening. The arc of extension/flexion increased by 19 degrees (0-80), and the range of pronation/supination increased by 31 degrees (0-130). There were no cases of infection or ulnar nerve dysfunction. At the latest follow-up, the HSS elbow score was 84 (40-100) points. 11 of 20 elbows were rated as excellent, 4 elbows were rated as good, 2 elbows were rated as fair, and 3 elbows were rated as poor. 14 of 16 patients were satisfied with the result and the 2 patients who were not satisfied had persistent pain. INTERPRETATION: Despite the inherent problems of cementing in small-calibre medullary cavities, the clinical outcome of the GSB III arthroplasty was encouraging for patients with-end stage RA. The rate of overall complications compared favorably with other studies of semiconstrained elbow arthroplasty for end-stage RA. Most complications of the series were minor and did not necessitate revision.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Fracture and dislocation of snowboarder's elbow.

BACKGROUND: This study focuses on the analysis of snowboarding versus skiing injuries, especially fracture, dislocation, or both, of the elbow, based on 7 years of medical records and roentgenograms of patients injured at a ski-snowboard area, Mt. Zao National Park, and demonstrates the precise characteristics of snowboard injury in the elbow region. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1,445 injured snowboarders and 10,152 injured skiers was undertaken to assess both snowboarding and skiing injuries. Sixty-four cases of snowboarding injuries and 152 cases of skiing injuries were available for precise analysis of fracture, dislocation, or both, in the elbow region. RESULTS: Fractures, dislocations, or both, in the elbow were more frequently observed for snowboarders (30 of 64 cases, 46.9%) when compared with that for skiers (26 of 152 cases, 17.1%) (p < 0.001). The rate of dislocation with or without fracture of the elbow was also significantly higher for snowboarders (17 of 64 cases, 26.6%) than for skiers (8 of 152 cases, 5.3%, p < 0.001). Seventeen cases of elbow dislocation in snowboarding were all of the posterior type, which accompanied two coronoid process fractures and two radial neck fractures. Fractures of the coronoid process (five cases), radial head (one case), radial neck (five cases), olecranon (one case), proximal ulnar shaft (one case), and extension-type fracture of distal humerus (four cases) were the fracture types observed in the analysis. CONCLUSION: Posterior dislocation; fractures of coronoid process, radial neck, and radial head; and extension-type fracture of the distal humerus characterize the particular and frequent injury mechanism responsible for snowboarding trauma in the elbow region. Thus, snowboarding injury of the elbow is recognized as a severe injury and is characterized by a frequent risk of posterior dislocation, fracture, or both. The severity of elbow injuries in snowboarding mainly seems to be due to direct mechanical force on the elbow, receiving the full impact of falling down, combined with an outstretched hand and elbow extension, or with an outstretched hand and longitudinal thrust force, to the proximal radius and ulna and distal humerus.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Measurement of isometric elbow and shoulder moments: position-dependent strength of posterior deltoid-to-triceps muscle tendon transfer in tetraplegia.

This report describes an apparatus which has been developed to measure several isometric elbow and shoulder forces and moments simultaneously and also allows this characterization to be performed across a range of shoulder and elbow joint angles in a horizontal plane. This apparatus was used to characterize the elbow extension strength in individuals with tetraplegia resulting from cervical level spinal cord injury. In all of these individuals, voluntary elbow extension was provided exclusively by the posterior deltoid muscle, which had previously been surgically transferred to the tendon of the paralyzed triceps muscle. Elbow extension is essential for many daily activities, such as reaching above shoulder level and pushing objects away from the body; the widely used posterior deltoid-to-triceps muscle tendon transfer surgery restores some degree of voluntary control to this important function. The apparatus contained a six-axis force-moment transducer to which the arm of each subject was attached. The six outputs of the transducer were transformed to correspond to physiological elbow and shoulder moments and forces. A customized table allowed the shoulder and elbow angles of the subject to be varied over a wide range in a horizontal plane so that the effects of posterior deltoid muscle length could be characterized over the likely functional range of the subject within this plane. It was found that elbow extension strength varied widely across subjects with C5 or C6 tetraplegia, from quite weak to strong enough to propel a manual wheelchair. Furthermore, the elbow extension strength of most subjects showed a strong dependence on both elbow and shoulder angles. Elbow extension was typically weak when the upper arm was elevated to shoulder level at the side, which unfortunately corresponds to the position often adopted by these individuals due to shoulder weakness.

Elbow Joint↗

PubMed2004

Distal humeral fractures treated with noncustom total elbow replacement.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the cases of patients with a distal humeral fracture that was treated with a noncustom total elbow arthroplasty. We hypothesized that, on the basis of the functional and clinical outcome, total elbow replacement is a reliable option for the treatment of elderly patients with a severe, comminuted fracture of the distal part of the humerus. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed forty-nine acute distal humeral fractures in forty-eight patients who were treated with total elbow arthroplasty as the primary option. The average age of the patients was sixty-seven years. Forty-three fractures were followed for at least two years. According to the AO classification, five fractures were type A, five were type B, and thirty-three were type C. The average age of the forty-three patients was sixty-nine years and the average duration of follow-up was seven years. Fourteen patients died during the review period. Postoperative clinical function was assessed with use of the Mayo elbow performance score, and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs made at follow-up examinations were reviewed. RESULTS: At the latest follow-up examination, the average flexion arc was 24 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 75 degrees ) to 131 degrees (range, 100 degrees to 150 degrees ) and the Mayo elbow performance score averaged 93 of a possible 100 points. Heterotopic ossification was present to some extent in seven elbows, with radiographic abutment noted in two. Thirty-two (65%) of the forty-nine elbows had neither a complication nor any further surgery from the time of the index arthroplasty to the most recent follow-up evaluation. Fourteen elbows (29%) had a single complication, and most of them did not require further surgery. Ten additional procedures, including five revision arthroplasties, were required in nine elbows; five were related to soft tissue and five were related to the implant or bone. CONCLUSIONS: Complex distal humeral fractures should be assessed primarily for the reliability with which they can be reconstructed with osteosynthesis. When osteosynthesis is not considered to be feasible, especially in patients who are physiologically older and place lower demands on the joint, total elbow arthroplasty can be considered. This retrospective review supports a recommendation for total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of an acute distal humeral fracture when strict inclusion criteria are observed.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Triceps insufficiency following total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the indications for total elbow arthroplasty have increased. One complication that is well recognized but is poorly described in the literature is insufficiency of the extensor mechanism involving complete or partial rupture, or avulsion, of the triceps tendon. We therefore reviewed the records of patients who had undergone surgery for the treatment of triceps insufficiency following total elbow arthroplasty to determine the management options and outcomes of intervention for this problem. METHODS: The records on 887 total elbow arthroplasties performed between 1982 and 2001 were assessed to identify patients who had undergone a subsequent procedure on the triceps. Patients in whom triceps insufficiency developed after débridement for infection were excluded, leaving sixteen elbows in fourteen patients. A Mayo Elbow Performance Score was calculated and elbow extension strength against gravity was measured at the time of final follow-up. RESULTS: There were seven male and seven female patients. The mean age was fifty-four years. The mean duration of follow-up after the triceps reconstruction was sixty-seven months. Three basic techniques were used to repair or reconstruct the extensor mechanism; these included direct suture in seven elbows, anconeus rotation in four, and use of an Achilles tendon allograft in four. The capacity to extend against gravity was restored to fifteen of the sixteen elbows. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, eleven elbows had an excellent outcome, three had a good outcome, and two were considered a clinical failure. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with triceps insufficiency following total elbow arthroplasty, it is possible to reconstruct the triceps mechanism with a procedure appropriately selected on the basis of tissue quality, tendon retraction, and the status of the olecranon.

Achilles Tendon↗

PubMed2005

Revision of unstable capitellocondylar (unlinked) total elbow replacement.

BACKGROUND: Instability is a recognized complication associated with unlinked total elbow implants. The best form of treatment of this problem is uncertain as very little has been written about it. METHODS: Twelve patients underwent operative treatment of instability at the site of a capitellocondylar unlinked total elbow replacement, and the results were reviewed retrospectively. The study group included ten women and two men with an average age of fifty-eight years. Ten patients had rheumatoid arthritis. Three elbows underwent conversion to a semi-constrained hinged prosthesis. In the other nine elbows, an attempt was made to continue with an unlinked prosthesis: three had reconstruction of one or both collateral ligaments, four had component revision, and two had both ligament reconstruction and component revision. RESULTS: After an average duration of follow-up of six years (range, two to fifteen years) only three patients had retained a functioning unlinked prosthesis. Of the remaining nine patients, three had had a conversion to a semi-constrained arthroplasty at the time of the index procedure, four had had a conversion to a semi-constrained prosthesis at the time of a salvage procedure, one had had a resection arthroplasty, and one had a painfully dislocated elbow and had declined revision. Thus, seven elbows eventually underwent conversion to a semi-constrained prosthesis; these conversion procedures were technically difficult, with perforation of the humerus occurring in six patients and perforation of the ulna occurring in four. After all procedures, the average elbow flexion was 132 degrees and the average flexion contracture was 25 degrees. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, there were four excellent results, three good results, three fair results, and one poor result. CONCLUSIONS: Revision of an unlinked total elbow prosthesis to a linked total elbow prosthesis is difficult, but it restores elbow function. Although the present series documents the unpredictability of attempts to salvage an unstable unlinked prosthesis, it seems reasonable to attempt at least one soft-tissue procedure before converting to a linked prosthesis.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Distal humeral fractures treated with noncustom total elbow replacement. Surgical technique.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗

PubMed2006

Arthroscopic and open synovectomy of the elbow in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Synovectomy has been advocated for early treatment of the rheumatoid elbow. It has not been determined whether arthroscopic or open synovectomy is better and whether a preoperative arc of flexion of >90 degrees is an important prognostic factor. METHODS: Arthroscopic or open synovectomy was performed in fifty-eight elbows in fifty-three patients with rheumatoid arthritis and radiographic changes in the joint of Larsen grade 2 or less. Clinical symptoms, recurrent synovitis, postoperative complications, and radiographic changes were assessed ten to eighteen years (average, thirteen years) postoperatively. RESULTS: Eleven (48%) of twenty-three elbows in which arthroscopic synovectomy had been performed and sixteen (70%) of twenty-three elbows in which open synovectomy had been performed were mildly or not painful at the latest follow-up evaluation. However, no significant difference was detected between the overall clinical results of arthroscopic synovectomy and those of open synovectomy. In elbows with a preoperative arc of flexion of <90 degrees , the clinical results of the two procedures were comparable. In elbows with a preoperative arc of flexion of <90 degrees , arthroscopic synovectomy provided significantly (p < 0.05) better function than open surgery after mid-term follow-up, and motion and function continued to be better in those patients at the most recent follow-up evaluation. Recurrent synovitis was observed in six elbows that had arthroscopic synovectomy and in three that had open synovectomy, and the Larsen grade increased in both groups. Three elbows with a preoperative arc of flexion of <90 degrees underwent a total elbow arthroplasty to treat ankylosis after open synovectomy. Surgical complications were uncommon and not severe. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic synovectomy of the elbow is a reliable procedure. One of the most favorable indications for either arthroscopic or open synovectomy is a preoperative arc of elbow flexion of >/=90 degrees in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

The stiff elbow.

Contracture of the elbow is a common complication of fractures, dislocations, burns, etc., around the elbow. The stiff or contracted elbow is defined as an elbow with a reduction in extension greater than 30 degrees, and/or a flexion less than 120 degrees. Although supination and pronation are often reduced as well, this will not be considered further as contracture of the elbow is not related to forearm rotation. Stiffness of the elbow impairs hand function, because this is highly dependent on elbow extension and flexion and forearm rotation. A 50% reduction of elbow motion can reduce the upper extremity function by almost 80%. Surgery of the posttraumatic stiff elbow is a challenging and demanding procedure. During recent years a more aggressive approach to the treatment of chronic contractures around the elbow joint in combination with more specific surgical techniques and an advanced postoperative rehabilitation have improved the final outcome. The purpose of my article is to define a reasonable and specific approach for the clinician in the surgical management of the posttraumatic stiff elbow, based on a review of the literature and my personal experience.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint. Relationship to medial instability.

BACKGROUND: Dislocation of the elbow joint is the second most common dislocation in the upper extremity, dislocation of the shoulder being the most common. It has been reported that uncomplicated dislocation of the elbow joint may be associated with a decreased range of motion, degenerative changes in the elbow joint, ectopic calcification, or neurological deficits. As the medial collateral ligament complex can be completely disrupted during dislocation, we evaluated the association between the long-term results of treatment of simple posterolateral dislocation of the elbow and the presence of persistent medial or valgus elbow instability. METHODS: Fifty patients who had a mean age of thirty-three years (range, eighteen to fifty-eight years) had closed reduction of a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow without associated fractures. The extremity was immobilized in an above-the-elbow plaster cast for three weeks. After a mean duration of follow-up of nine years (range, six to thirteen years), forty-one patients were evaluated with an interview, a physical examination, and radiographs made while a valgus load was applied to the elbow. RESULTS: The average score according to the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery was 91 points (range, 49 to 100 points), and thirty-one patients described their elbow function as good or excellent. Twenty-four patients had evidence of medial instability on radiographs made while a valgus load was applied to the elbow. Twenty-one patients had signs of degeneration of the joint, and twenty-five patients had ectopic ossification. Magnetic resonance imaging combined with arthrography was performed for the first twenty patients; eight had evidence of rupture of the medial collateral ligament, seven had generalized degenerative changes of the cartilage, and four had a chondral defect of the capitellum. (The study could not be completed for the remaining patient.) Medial instability on radiographs was correlated with signs of degeneration (p = 0.001), ectopic ossification (p = 0.01), a worse score according to the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery (p = 0.002), and persistent pain (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint can lead to persistent valgus instability that is associated with a worse overall clinical and radiographic result.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Arthroscopy of the elbow joint].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The authors evaluate a group of patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy in the period between August 2001 and August 2003. They pay attention to indications, the technique used, surgical diagnoses, postoperative outcomes and complications. MATERIAL: We performed 28 elbow arthroscopies in 26 patients; two patients were operated on both elbow joints. The group comprised 20 men and 6 women between 14 to 73 years, with an average of 44 years. The average follow-up was 18 months (range, 4-28 months). METHODS: We usually operated on patients in a prone position under general anesthesia, with the use of a tourniquet. We used the following approaches: anterolateral and anteromedial, posterolateral (also termed direct lateral approach), posterocentral and upper posterolateral. To evaluate the outcome we used the modified Morrey system for the elbow joint after surgery. We assessed pain and the ability to manage daily activities, joint mobility and the presence of complications. RESULTS: Of 28 elbows, 21 had excellent outcomes and seven were satisfactory; no poor outcome was recorded. Most of the patients were satisfied with the postoperative result (25 out of 28 arthroscopies; 89%). An improvement by 20 degrees and more was achieved in the range of motion in 14 out of 21 patients (67%). No infection or serious injury to nerves or blood vessels was recorded. DISCUSSION: In elbow arthroscopy, the proximal modifications of anteromedial and anterolateral approaches proved to be more convenient, permitting better manipulation with instruments. The removal of intra-articular bodies was one of the first indications for arthroscopy. Good postoperative outcomes, similar to those reported in the literature, stimulated us to employ elbow arthroscopy also in other indications. With the use of a gentle technique, good results can be achieved in some acute injuries or post-traumatic conditions in which, however, arthroscopy requires greater skills. The same experience has been reported by other authors. We recorded no serious neurovascular complications; these are described to occur at a frequency of 0 to 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Taking all risks into consideration, elbow arthroscopy is beneficial for patients and is a contribution to elbow surgery. Our results suggest that elbow arthroscopy is the method of choice for not only removal of the intra-articular bodies, but also treatment of moderate arthritis not responding to conservative therapy for 3 to 6 months at least. Elbow arthroscopy may be benefical to co-operation with the rheumatologist and in traumatic conditions. As in arthroscopy for other joint, it has the advantage of a much shorter postoperative morbidity than in open procedures.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1983

Motor and sensory ulnar nerve conduction velocities: effect of elbow position.

Ulnar motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (NCV) were studied bilaterally in 20 able-bodied subjects for below elbow (BE) and across elbow (AE) segments to assess the effect of 4 different elbow positions on NCV (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees). Although constant skin stimulation marker points were used, the AE segment length became progressively longer with increased elbow flexion. At 0 degrees flexion the AE segment motor NCV was found to be slower, and at 45 degrees it was found faster than the BE NCV. At each subsequent elbow flexion position (90 degrees and 135 degrees) there was an erroneous increase in motor and sensory NCV for the AE segments (p less than 0.01). This increase in AE NCV with elbow flexion was mostly due to stretching of skin over the flexed elbow. The nerve itself was observed in 4 cadaver specimens to slide distally with respect to the above elbow skin marker. Since 45 degrees elbow flexion was the position of least variation in motor NCV for AE and BE segments, this degree of elbow flexion appears to be optimum. From these measurements and from literature review neither short AE segment length (less than 10 cm) nor long AE segment length (greater than 15 cm) is optimum for measurement of AE NCV in the assessment of compressive neuropathy at the elbow. Short segments are subject to increased NCV variation while long segments may not detect pathological slowing of NCV only occurring over a short portion of the nerve.

Adult↗

PubMed1983

[Measurement study of anatomical shape and size in Japanese elbow joints].

Recently, total elbow replacement has been developed for reconstruction of destructed elbow joints. However, various complications occurred in the constrained or semi-constrained types of elbow replacement, while unconstrained type such as surface replacement showed lower incidence of such complications. On the other hand, development of the elbow prosthesis needs anatomical measurement of the elbow for adaptation to the need of Japanese. Basically, prosthesis should be designed based on the anatomical and biomechanical analysis. In this study, elbow from 36 Japanese cadavers were measured in the outer contour and microradiograms of the sectioned samples. Midline axes of the humerus and ulna, and the center of both medial and lateral epicondyles are fixed as standardized lines for the study in the elbow measurement. The trochlea is situated slightly anteriorly from the midline of the humerus. Width of the trochlea is 21.4 +/- 2.6 mm on the right side and 21.1 +/- 2.8 mm on the left at the anterior margin. At the distal margin, the width is 23.5 +/- 2.8 mm on the right and 23.3 +/- 2.6 mm on the left, and at the posterior margin, 23.9 +/- 3.6 mm on the right and 23.5 +/- 2.8 mm on the left. Saggittal section of the humeral end shows almost complete circle in the articular surface of the trochlea. The diameter is 19.1 mm on the right and 19.3 mm on the left at the longitudinal axis of the humerus, 17.6 mm on the right and 17.7 mm on the left at the central groove, and 24.5 mm on the right, 22.6 mm on the left at the medial margin. Anterior angulation of the trochlea is about 12 degrees. Central line of the trochlea corresponds to the center of the flexion-extension of the elbow, but angulated by 8 degrees from the humeral axis from the anterior view, and internally rotated by 3 degrees from the center of the both epicondyles from the bottom view. In the measurement of the incisura trochlea, opening distance is 18.5 +/- 2.1 mm on the right, 18.5 +/- 2.0 mm on the left, and the depth is 11.8 mm on the right, 11.6 mm on the left at the mean. Forward angulation of the incisura is 30.8 degrees on the right and 28.3 degrees on the left. Width of the olecranon is 25.0 +/- 3.2 mm on the right, 25.0 +/- 2.9 mm on the left and the thickness is 18.6 +/- 1.6 mm on the right, 18.7 +/- 1.8 mm on the left. The central line of the olecranon is supero-laterally angulated about 7 degrees from the longitudinal axis of the ulna. This angulation and lateral opening of the central line of the trochlea seems to produce carring angle of the elbow. Measurement of the elbow size and shape is discussed for designing elbow prosthesis and some biomechanical problems are also represented.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Arthroscopy of the elbow.

As our understanding of the anatomy and function of the elbow joint continues to grow and technology continues to advance, our ability to correct disorders of the elbow with arthroscopic techniques will expand. Today, we are at the brink of major advances in the arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of elbow ailments. Many open surgical procedures currently being performed will undoubtedly be adapted for an arthroscopic approach, as we are already seeing in the treatment of radiocapitellar arthrosis, tennis elbow, arthrofibrosis, and ulnohumeral arthroplasty. Elbow procedures, such as ligamentous tightening, fracture treatment with bioabsorbable devices, and biologic joint replacement will be commonly performed in the future with the aid of the arthroscope. Although elbow arthroscopy is technically demanding, it is a highly effective surgical technique in treating many intra-articular disorders with minimal morbidity. Most of the complications associated with elbow arthroscopy can be avoided by adhering to strict and proper surgical technique. Successful elbow arthroscopy requires a thorough understanding of local gross and arthroscopic anatomy. To maintain proper orientation at all times, the skin should be properly marked before starting the procedure. The joint should be kept distended during initiation of portals to move the neurovascular structures away from the arthroscopic instruments. Nonvented cannulas with blunt trocars should be used to allow for safe passage of instruments and to avoid multiple capsular punctures. Finally, the elbow should remain flexed to 90 deg during most of the procedure, thus keeping the neurovascular structures in the antecubital fossa relaxed. If these techniques are followed, the surgical morbidity should remain low, and surgeon and patient will find elbow arthroscopy tremendously effective.

Arthroplasty↗

PubMed1995

Reprogramming of muscle activation patterns at the wrist in compensation for elbow reaction torques during planar two-joint arm movements.

The relationship between wrist kinematics, dynamics and the pattern of muscle activation were examined during a two-joint planar movement in which the two joints moved in opposite directions, i.e. elbow flexion/wrist extension and elbow extension/wrist flexion. Elbow movements (ranging from 10 to 70 deg) and wrist movements (ranging from 10 to 50 deg) were performed during a visual, step-tracking task in which subjects were required to attend to the initial and final angles at each joint. As the elbow amplitude increased, wrist movement duration increased and the wrist movement trajectories became quite variable. Analysis of the torques acting at the wrist joint showed that elbow movements produced reaction torques acting in the same direction as the intended wrist movement. Distinct patterns of muscle activation were observed at the wrist joint that were dependent on the relative magnitude of the elbow reaction torque in relation to the net wrist torque. When the magnitude of the elbow reaction torque was quite small, the wrist agonist was activated first. As the magnitude of the elbow reaction torque increased, activity in the wrist agonist decreased significantly. In conditions where the elbow reaction torque was much larger than the net wrist torque, the wrist muscle torque reversed direction to oppose the intended movement. This reversal of wrist muscle torque was directly associated with a change in the pattern of muscle activation where the wrist antagonist was activated prior to the wrist agonist. Our findings indicate that motion of the elbow joint is an important consideration in planning wrist movement. Specifically, the selection of muscle activation patterns at the wrist is dependent on the relative magnitude and direction of the elbow reaction torque in relation to the direction of wrist motion.

Animals↗