SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ejection fraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed1992

The value of the ejection fraction as a predictor of postoperative cardiac mortality in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.

Retrospective evaluation was undertaken in 131 patients who underwent peripheral vascular operations before which a multigated scan had been obtained. The patients were assigned to one of three groups according to their pre-operatively determined ejection fraction; 82 patients had an ejection fraction greater than 55%, in 38 patients the ejection fraction was between 36% and 54% and in 11 patients it was 35% or less. Two cardiac deaths occurred in each of the three groups. Although mortality in the three groups just failed to achieve statistical significance, metanalysis of published reports indicates that significant mortality exists for patients with an ejection fraction of less than 35% compared with those with an ejection fraction of over 55%. In this series, if the ejection fraction was used as the sole indicator, it was not an accurate predictor of peri-operative cardiac mortality. However, when used in conjunction with patient factors, such as cardiac history and status of the resting ECG, it did define a group of patients in whom there was a significant clinical risk of peri-operative cardiac mortality.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Preliminary pulsatile flow bench validation of a thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction system.

A preliminary Pulsatile Flow Bench validation of the REF-1 Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction (RVEF) computer and catheter system was performed to determine the accuracy of the current REF-1 system. These results reflect the accuracy of the current REF-1 system and not the final REF-1 system that will be released at a later date. The Pulsatile Flow Bench cardiac output and ejection fraction ranges included in this study are 1 to 6 Lpm and 15% to 60%, respectively. Currently, plans are being made to increase the flow bench cardiac output range to 10 Lpm with ejection fractions up to 70%. The results of this study show a correlation coefficient of 0.94 (adjusted R-square) between flow bench ejection fractions and REF-1 system ejection fractions. Also, the correlation coefficient between flow bench cardiac output and REF-1 system cardiac output was determined to be 0.99 (adjusted R-square).

Calibration↗

PubMed1996

Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison with radionuclide angiography.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional echocardiography is a promising technique for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction, because it allows its measurement without geometric assumptions. However, few data exist that study its reproducibility and accuracy in patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography that used the rotational technique (2 degrees interval and ECG and respiratory gating). Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction were calculated by use of Simpson's rule at a slice thickness of 3 mm. Analyses were performed to define the largest slice thickness required for accurate calculation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Three-dimensional echocardiography showed excellent correlation with radionuclide angiography for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction (mean +/- SD, 38.9 +/- 19.8 and 38.5 +/- 18.0, respectively; r = .99); their mean difference was not significant (0.03 +/- 0.17; P = .3), and they had a close limit of agreement (-0.385, 0.315). Intraobserver variability for radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography was 4.2% and 2.6%, respectively, whereas interobserver variability was 6.2% and 5.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference between left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculated at a slice thickness of 3 mm and that calculated at different slice thicknesses up to 24 mm. However, the standard deviation of the mean difference showed a stepwise increase, particularly at thicknesses > 15 mm. At a slice thickness of 15 mm, the probability of three-dimensional echocardiography to detect > or = 6% difference in ejection fraction was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional echocardiography has excellent correlation with radionuclide angiography for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients and has an observer variability similar to that of radionuclide angiography. We recommend the use of a 15-mm-thick slice for accurate and rapid measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Effect of sequential administration of an opioid and cholecystokinin on gallbladder ejection fraction: brief communication.

UNLABELLED: This study was undertaken to test the effect of sequential administration of an opioid and intravenous cholecystokinin (CCK) on gallbladder ejection fraction. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who had received an opioid underwent quantitative cholescintigraphy with octapeptide of CCK (CCK-8). Gallbladder ejection fraction and CCK-8-induced paradoxical filling were calculated. RESULTS: In the basal state, more of the hepatic bile entered the gallbladder (67%) than the small intestine (33%). After CCK-8 infusion, gallbladder ejection fraction was low in 37 (76%) of 49 patients and normal in 12 (24%). All 5 types of opioids lowered ejection fraction. CCK-induced paradoxical filling of the gallbladder was noted in 7 patients, but only one showed paradoxical filling of greater than 20% and none had a normal gallbladder ejection fraction. The lowering effect of opioids on gallbladder ejection fraction may last as long as 18 h after intake. CONCLUSION: CCK-8 produced a normal gallbladder ejection fraction in 24% of patients who had received an opioid and thus could exclude both acute and chronic cholecystitis during a single hepatobiliary study.

Artifacts↗

PubMed1995

Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the agreement of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography. BACKGROUND: Previously published reports suggest that two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography are equally acceptable methods of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction on the basis of high coefficients of correlation. However, correlation of methods does not necessarily imply agreement. METHODS: In a prospective analysis, 25 consecutive subjects all had two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography performed within 10 days of each other in the cardiology department of metropolitan community hospital. A retrospective computer search (Medline) revealed seven studies, using the coefficient of correlation (r), comparing two-dimensional echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 268) with radionuclide angiographic (n = 174) or contrast cineangiographic (n = 119) left ventricular ejection fractions. RESULTS: The eight individual studies (n = 293) comparing two-dimensional echocardiography with either radionuclide angiography or contrast cineangiography exhibited coefficients of correlation ranging from 0.78 to 0.93. Agreement analysis using the method of Bland and Altman was performed by averaging the results obtained from the two techniques and determining how disparate any single ejection fraction was (with 95% confidence limits) from the mean value. Agreement ranged from 23% to 42% around the mean ejection fraction. The average lack of agreement between the two methods for all studies involved was 17%, with an average r value of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular ejection fraction determinations by means of two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography exhibit high correlation and only moderate agreement. High correlation does not always imply high agreement. These results suggest that, when validated by agreement analysis, multiple studies may not be necessary in appropriate clinical situations, potentially reducing costs.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Limits of reproducibility of cross-sectional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.

The total intrinsic variability of echocardiographically determined ejection fraction was evaluated in this study. Cross-sectional left ventricular echocardiograms were made in 14 normal volunteers (9 men, 5 women), ages 31 to 41 years (mean 36 years) with an interval period of about 11 months. We used the parasternal long-axis view, the short-axis view at the papillary muscle level and the four-chamber view from the apex. M-mode recordings were made from the parasternal long-axis view. Simpson's rule and area-length formulas were used to calculate left ventricular volumes and the ejection fraction. From the methods under investigation, the Teichholz technique and the bullet method showed the best reproducibility of the ejection fraction with a coefficient of variation of 4 +/- 3% and 6 +/- 4%, respectively (mean +/- SD). The methods of Baran, and the approach using slices, showed rather large coefficients of variation, 14 +/- 11% and 9 +/- 6%, respectively.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Determination of ejection fraction from contrast echocardiography using videodensitometry in an in vitro model.

To examine whether ejection fraction can be estimated by videodensitometric analysis of contrast washout from a chamber, a model was constructed consisting of a 60-ml syringe and a modified Harvard respirator. Ejection fraction could be adjusted mechanically. Echocardiographic images were recorded on videotape and analyzed on an offline computerized analysis system. To calibrate the relationship between target concentration and videodensity on our sector scanner-videodensity analysis system, we used a phantom with constant attenuation and eight cones with known, varying relative scatterer concentration. The time-gain-compensation curve was kept constant on the ultrasound instrument and videodensity was measured from videotapes by an offline computer system. In the image of each cone, a 10 X 70 pixel operator-designated region of interest was chosen, and mean videodensity/pixel (256 level gray scale) was calculated. A logarithmic relation was found between scatterer concentration and videodensity. This excellent log relationship existed at all three gain levels studied: at 40% of maximum gain, r = .96; at 50% gain, r = .99; and at 60% gain, r = .99 (all p less than .001). Boluses of .5 ml sonicated Hypaque were then injected into the chamber and the contrast washout was recorded at ejection fractions of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70%. Bolus delivery and complete contrast mixing was attained except at ejection fraction 20%. Using the first two to four stroke videodensity decay the ejection fraction was calculated by estimating microbubble concentration decline using the logarithmic regression equation between videodensity and scatter concentration obtained during calibration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Densitometry↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Thermodilution measures of right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart transplant recipients: a comparison with radionuclide angiography.

A reliable, convenient measure of right ventricular ejection fraction may be a useful adjunct to evaluate cardiac allograft rejection. The purpose of this investigation was to compare two measures of right ventricular ejection fraction: (1) radionuclide angiography with the first-pass technique and (2) thermodilution with a balloon flotation catheter. The study was performed in 26 heart transplant recipients; hemodynamics, thermodilution cardiac output, and right ventricular ejection fraction were measured. First pass radionuclide angiography was performed either simultaneously (n = 11) or within 4 hours (n = 15) of the thermodilution study. Mean thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction was 39% +/- 8%, and radionuclide angiography ejection fraction was 47% +/- 9%, which represents a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in techniques. Linear regression showed no correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.3; p = NS). No differences in results were observed in those studied simultaneously versus less than 4 hours. We conclude that the thermodilution technique underestimates right ventricular ejection fraction in heart transplant recipients and that its usefulness as a tool to screen for systolic dysfunction related to rejection is limited.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

PubMed1979

Effect of a physical conditioning program upon left ventricular ejection fractions determined serially by a noninvasive technique.

6 clinically normal subjects underwent a 3-month physical conditioning program with the ejection fractions determined before and after physical conditioning using a scintillation probe. All subjects achieved a conditioning effect as evidenced by increased treadmill test duration after conditioning (mean duration before conditioning: 658 vs. 715 sec after conditioning; p less than 0.02). All 6 subjects increased resting ejection fractions after conditioning (mean ejection fraction before conditioning: 54.5 +/- 5.4%; mean ejection fraction after conditioning: 67.0 +/- 9.0%; p less than 0.01). Thus, an aerobic physical conditioning program appears to increase resting ejection fractions in normal subjects.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Mechanisms for an abnormal radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction response to exercise in patients with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation.

To clarify the mechanisms for an abnormal radionuclide left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction response to exercise in patients with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (AR), we studied seven control patients and 21 patients with AR. We used exercise radionuclide angiography and catheterization of the right and left sides of the heart to obtain a calculation of LV chamber elastance. The control and AR groups had similar heart rates, systolic blood pressure responses to exercise, and exercise durations. In both patient groups, LV end-diastolic volume did not change with exercise. In contrast to the decrease in LV end-systolic volume (p less than 0.05) and increase in LV ejection fraction (p less than 0.01) in the control group, LV end-systolic volume in the patients with AR increased, resulting in little change in their LV ejection fraction. By stepwise multiple regression analysis, the radionuclide LV ejection fraction at peak exercise in patients with AR was determined by the LV chamber elastance, LV end-systolic volume, and stroke volume at peak exercise (cumulative r = 0.79, p less than 0.02); the change in radionuclide LV ejection fraction from rest to peak exercise was determined by the corresponding change in systemic vascular resistance, regurgitant index, and LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (cumulative r = 0.88, p less than 0.02). These data demonstrate that in patients with AR, the radionuclide LV ejection fraction at peak exercise is principally determined by the cumulative effects of chronic, severe AR on LV systolic chamber performance, and the change in radionuclide LV ejection fraction from rest to peak exercise is principally established by peripheral vascular responses.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗

PubMed1988

The effects of stress on left ventricular ejection fraction.

The left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was studied in 17 healthy volunteers with a new ambulatory left ventricular function monitor. Heart rate, EF, and blood pressure measurements were made during rest, a psychiatric stress interview, cold exposure, exercise, and eating. An increase in EF was seen during emotional stress (from 0.45 +/- 0.09 to 0.51 +/- 0.13, P less than 0.001). This increase was comparable to that observed during exercise (0.52 +/- 0.14) and eating (0.52 +/- 0.10, P less than 0.001). In contrast, cold exposure caused a decrease in EF (0.43 +/- 0.13, P less than 0.05). These observations demonstrate the powerful hemodynamic consequences of common behaviors as well as the utility and feasibility of studying such behavioral factors in ambulatory subjects.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Comparison and reproducibility of visual echocardiographic and quantitative radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions.

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is commonly assessed by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and echocardiography. These methods are presumed to be interchangeable for this purpose. This study (1) compares quantification of LVEF by equilibrium radionuclide angiography with visual estimation of LVEF by echocardiography, (2) determines the reproducibility of both methods, and (3) evaluates whether differences in determinations of LVEF are of clinical relevance. Seventy-three clinically stable patients had both equilibrium radionuclide angiography and echocardiography performed within a 4-day period. LVEF by both techniques was compared after blinded analysis by 3 echocardiographers and 3 nuclear technologists. Reproducibility was assessed by blinded repeat analysis after a 1-week interval. The frequency of differences in repeat assessments of EF that the authors considered to be of potential clinical relevance (i.e., difference > or = 10% EF units) was assessed for both techniques. Correlation of LVEF determined by both methods was good (r = 0.81, SEE = 3.5) but with substantial differences in individual patients (limits of agreement, 23.6%). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was good for both methods, but better for radionuclide LVEF than for echocardiographic LVEF. Limits of agreement were substantially better for radionuclide LVEF than for echocardiographic LVEF (1.8% to 3.6% versus 13.4% to 17.4%, respectively). Clinically relevant differences did not occur on repeat processing of equilibrium radionuclide angiography. In contrast, potentially clinically relevant differences occurred in 8% to 26% of studies on repeat analysis of echocardiography. Thus, LVEF determined by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and echocardiography show good agreement. Both methods provide clinically valuable measurements for LV function. However, when a precisely reproducible measurement is required for patient management decisions, equilibrium radionuclide angiography is the method of choice.

Adult↗

PubMed2007

A correlative study comparing current different methods of calculating left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a major determinant of survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Comparative accuracy of numerous modalities in calculating EF is not well investigated. METHOD: We compared EF as calculated by rest and post-stress Cedars automated quantitative gated SPECT (AQGS), rest and post-stress semi-automatically processed gated SPECT (MQGS), echocardiography and contrast ventriculography (LVG) to those determined by rest and post-stress cavity-to-myocardium ratio (CMR) in 109 patients. Gated SPECT was performed based on a 2-day protocol using Tc-MIBI. RESULTS: Mean EF in LVG, echo, post-stress CMR, rest CMR, post-stress AQGS, rest AQGS, post-stress MQGS and rest MQGS were 41.8%+/-12.1, 44.8%+/-11.8, 38.1%+/-10.7, 35.7%+/-12.1, 44.5%+/-15.1, 46.9%+/-14.7, 40.1%+/-14.3 and 43.5%+/-14.3 respectively. Although significant differences were observed between some of these methods, good and excellent linear correlations were present among values (all Pearson correlations >0.63). Considering LVG as the 'gold standard', we defined two groups: EF <35% (class 1) and >35% (class 2). Discriminant analysis showed that SPECT has the ability to predict patients' classes. In 4/18 of patients with normal SPECT (on both visual and quantitative analyses, SSS <4), EF on QGS showed a significant decrease on post-stress compared with rest. CONCLUSION: There is a good correlation in calculating EF by LVG, QGS and echocardiography, regardless of EF value. Whenever QGS is impossible, CMR is a reliable indirect indicator of EF. Gating of both phases (and when impossible, CMR of both phases) has an additional value in diagnosis of CAD.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Proteomic patterns according to ejection fraction: an EMPEROR-programme analysis.

AIMS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been incorporated as an inclusion criterion in HF trials. Patient's characteristics, event risk, and treatment response vary according to LVEF. A better understanding of the biological processes across LVEF is warranted. To study proteomic biomarker expression across LVEF using data from the EMPEROR-Programme. METHODS: Two thousand two hundred and fifty-four patients who had proteomic measurements available using 1134 proteins overlapping between the Explore 1536 and 3072 Olink® platforms were included. Main analyses were performed within the EMPEROR-Preserved dataset due to differences in entry criteria between EMPEROR-Preserved and EMPEROR-Reduced with higher entry N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels that varied by LVEF cut-offs in the latter. Protein concentrations were compared using ordinal logistic regression across LVEF categories: 41%-49%, 50%-59%, and ≥60%. The resulting β-coefficient indicates the change in the log-odds for the outcome of being in a lower LVEF category for every NPX unit in log2 scale. Analyses were adjusted for covariates and a false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction was applied. RESULTS: A total of 297 proteins exhibited a trend of expression across LVEF categories in EMPEROR-Preserved after adjustment for potential confounders and correction for test multiplicity. Of these, the top 10 proteins were: NT-pro BNP (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.27), Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (β = 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.61), sialomucin core protein 24 (β = 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-0.74), phospholipid transfer protein (β = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.59), natriuretic peptides B (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.20), intercellular adhesion molecule 5 (β = 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.49), neural cell adhesion molecule 2 (β = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.70), neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein (β = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.71), interactor protein for cytohesin exchange factors 1 (β = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.19), and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, peroxisomal (β = 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.26). The correlation between these proteins and LVEF was generally weak (Rho ≤0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Within EMPEROR-Preserved, the top differentially expressed circulating proteins suggest that pathways related to natriuretic peptides, cell-adhesion, and clonal haematopoiesis are overexpressed at mildly-reduced ejection fraction, but none of the proteins passed the 5%FDR cut-off, and the correlation between circulating proteins and LVEF was weak. These findings suggest that circulating proteins may not be a good discriminant of ejection fraction.

Humans↗

PubMed1985

First-third ejection fraction: is the first-pass radionuclide method accurate?

Previous reports have suggested that left ventricular first-third ejection fraction (EF) can be obtained from the left ventricular time-activity curve derived from first-pass radionuclide angiography based on Anger camera data. The validity of this technique was assessed by: a study of beat-to-beat variations in data from 15 patients in which electrocardiographic data were simultaneously recorded, and a computer simulation incorporating the application of Poisson statistics to appropriate count rate data. The results of patients studies showed no consistent trend in any first-third parameter obtained from consecutive beats in individual subjects, and unacceptably high statistical uncertainty in the calculation of the first-third ejection fraction. The weighted standard deviation of the first-third ejection fraction in each of 15 patients studied averaged 7.5 EF units, while first-third ejection fraction averaged 22.9 EF units. The relative error averaged 32%. The computer simulation indicated a high relative error of 47% associated with the first-third ejection fraction at typical end-diastolic count rates of 200 per frame from 1,000 computer Poisson randomizations of an appropriate analog volume curve. The results render the first-pass radiocardiographic method invalid for determining first-third ejection fraction.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

Regional ejection fraction: a quantative radionuclide index of regional left ventricular performance.

Radionuclide measurements of regional left ventricular ejection fraction were evaluated as a quantitative index of regional left ventricular function. Left ventricular regional ejection fractions were derived from background-corrected, time-activity curves in 43 patients assessed by both gated equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography and left ventricular contrast angiography. From a single, modified left anterior oblique projection, the regional change in background corrected counts was determined in each of three anatomic regions. The normal range for regional radionuclide ejection fraction was determined in 10 patients with normal contrast ventriculograms and without obstructive coronary artery disease at coronary arteriography. Regional ejection fraction was compared with percent segmental axis shortening and extent of akinetic segments in corresponding regions of the contrast ventriculogram. Radionuclide and roentgenographic methods were in agreement as to the presence or absence of abnormal wall motion in 83 of 99 left ventricular regions (84%) in 33 patients evaluated prospectively. Comparison of regional ejection fraction demonstrated significant differences between regions with roentgenographically determined normokinesis (75 +/- 3%, mean +/- SEM), hypokinesis (44 +/- 3%, p less than 0.0005) and akinesis (24 +/- 5%, p less than 0.005). We conclude that the left ventricular regional ejection provides a reliable quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular performance.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Quantitative gated blood pool tomographic assessment of regional ejection fraction: definition of normal limits.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to select a method of analysis for gated blood pool tomography that reduced variability in a group of normal subjects, allowed comparison with normal limit files and displayed results in the bull's-eye format. BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in left ventricular function may not be accurately detected by measures of global function because hyperkinesia in normal regions may compensate for abnormal regional function. Gated blood pool tomography acquires three-dimensional data and offers advantages over other noninvasive modalities for quantitative assessment of global and regional function. METHODS: Alternative methods for selecting the ventricular axis, calculating regional ejection fraction and choosing the number of ventricular divisions were studied in 15 normal volunteers to select the combination of parameters that produced the lowest variability in quantitative regional ejection fraction. Methods for quantitative comparison of regional ejection fraction with normal limit files and for display in the bull's-eye format were also examined. RESULTS: A fixed axis (the geometric center of the ventricle defined for end-diastole and used for end-systole) gave ejection fractions that were significantly higher in the lateral wall versus in the septum, 82 +/- 8 (mean +/- 1 SD) versus 39 +/- 17 (p less than 0.001) at the midcavity and 66 +/- 11 versus 21 +/- 20 (p less than 0.001) at the base. A floating axis system (axis defined individually for end-diastole and end-systole and realigned at the center) gave more uniform regional ejection fraction: 63 +/- 6 versus 64 +/- 8 (p = NS) at the midcavity and 44 +/- 16 versus 45 +/- 15 (p = NS) at the base. The coefficient of variability for regional ejection fraction was consistently lower using a floating axis. Calculating regional ejection fraction by dividing the regional stroke volume by the end-diastolic volume of the region gave a lower coefficient of variability and a more easily understood value than dividing the regional stroke volume by the total end-diastolic volume of the ventricle. Although the variability was lower using five versus nine ventricular divisions, nine regions offer greater spatial resolution. Comparison of regional ejection fraction with normal data identified regions greater than 2.5 SD below the mean as abnormal. We described the two-dimensional bull's-eye format as a method for displaying the regional three-dimensional data and illustrated abnormalities in patients with prior myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Gated blood pool tomography performed using a floating axis system, regional stroke volume calculation of ejection fraction and nine regions uses all the three-dimensional blood pool data to calculate regional ejection fraction, allow quantitative comparison with normal limit files, display the functional data in the two-dimensional bull's-eye format and demonstrate abnormalities in patients with myocardial infarction.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Transfer function analysis of the ventricular function: a new method for calculating right ventricular ejection fraction.

The relationship between the ventricular transfer function and ejection fraction has been investigated by the routine procedure of first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography. Ejection fraction has been shown to equal 1-e(-b), where b is the ratio of the R-R interval over the mean transit time difference between ventricular and atrial time-activity curves. To evaluate the effect of region of interest (ROI) on the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), the results of the transfer function analysis (TFA) technique using precise ROI, TFA using rectangular ROI, and the routine method were compared. Regression analyses among RVEFs obtained from the above ROI methods yielded good correlations. Reliable RVEFs have been obtained even in the case of an improper bolus injection. Thus, the TFA technique is a new, simple, and reliable method for calculating RVEF without needing to outline the right ventricle precisely.

Heart↗