Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Destrin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Ser6 in the maize actin-depolymerizing factor, ZmADF3, is phosphorylated by a calcium-stimulated protein kinase and is essential for the control of functional activity.

Maize actin-depolymerizing factor, ZmADF, binds both G- and F-actin and enhances in vitro actin dynamics. Evidence from studies on vertebrate ADF/cofilin supports the view that this class of protein responds to intracellular and extracellular signals and causes actin reorganization. As a test to determine whether such signal-responsive pathways existed in plants, this study addressed the ability of maize ADF to be phosphorylated and the likely effects of such phosphorylation on its capacity to modulate actin dynamics. It is shown that maize ADF3 (ZmADF3) can be phosphorylated by a calcium-stimulated protein kinase present in a 40-70% ammonium sulphate fraction of a plant cell extract. Phosphorylation is shown to be on Ser6, which is only one of nine amino acids that are fully conserved among the ADF/cofilin proteins across distantly related species. In addition, an analogue of phosphorylated ZmADF3 created by mutating Ser6 to Asp6 (zmadf3-4) does not bind G- or F-actin and has little effect on the enhancement of actin dynamics. These results are discussed in context of the previously observed actin reorganization in root hair cells.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Interaction of pollen-specific actin-depolymerizing factor with actin.

We have examined the interaction of recombinant lily pollen ADF, LlADF1, with actin and found that whilst it bound both G- and F-actin, it had a much smaller effect on the polymerization and depolymerization rate constants than the maize vegetative ADF, ZmADF3. An antiserum specific to pollen ADF, antipADF, was raised and used to localize pollen ADF in daffodil--a plant in which massive reorganizations of the actin cytoskeleton have been seen to occur as pollen enters and exits dormancy. We show, for the first time, an ADF decorating F-actin in cells that did not result from artificial increase in ADF concentration. In dehydrated pollen this ADF : actin array is replaced by actin : ADF rodlets and aggregates of actin, which presumably act as a storage form of actin during dormancy. In germinated pollen ADF has no specific localization, except when an adhesion is made at the tip where actin and ADF now co-localize. These activities of pollen ADF are discussed with reference to the activities of ZmADF3 and other members of the ADF/cofilin group of proteins.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

The effect of two actin depolymerizing factors (ADF/cofilins) on actin filament turnover: pH sensitivity of F-actin binding by human ADF, but not of Acanthamoeba actophorin.

Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) from vertebrates and actophorin from Acanthamoeba castellanii are members of a protein family that bind monomeric and polymeric actin and have been shown by microscopy to sever filaments. Here, we compare the properties of recombinant human ADF and actophorin using rabbit muscle actin. ADF binds tenfold more strongly than actophorin to monomeric actin (G-actin)-ATP, and both bind co-operatively to F-actin. ADF decorates filaments below pH 7.3 and induces substantial depolymerization at higher pH values [Hawkins, M., Pope, B., Maciver, S. K. & Weeds, A. G. (1993) Human actin depolymerizing factor mediates a pH-sensitive destruction of actin filaments, Biochemistry 32, 9985-9993], but, at all pH values tested, actophorin binds to filaments in a similar manner to ADF at pH 6.5. Both proteins increase the depolymerization rate at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped filaments, but the effect of ADF is more marked at pH 8.0. Both proteins accelerate the nucleating activity when mixed with filamentous actin (F-actin), but not with gelsolin-capped filaments, and they rapidly decrease the lengths of filaments as evidenced by electron microscopy. Both of these effects are best explained by a weak severing activity. Our results are discussed in relation to earlier models and to the structural changes observed when ADF binds F-actin [McGough, A., Pope, B., Chiu, W. & Weeds, A. (1997) Cofilin changes the twist of F-actin: implications for actin filament dynamics and cellular function, J. Cell Biol. 138, 771-781]. We also discuss the relevance of these observations to their possible roles in facilitating actin turnover in cells, thereby regulating filament dynamics in cell motility.

Acanthamoeba↗

Gelsolin as a calcium-regulated actin filament-capping protein.

Various concentrations of gelsolin (25-100 nM) were added to 2 microM polymerized actin. The concentrations of free calcium were adjusted to 0.05-1.5 microM by EGTA/Ca2+ buffer. Following addition of gelsolin actin depolymerization was observed that was caused by dissociation of actin subunits from the pointed ends of treadmilling actin filaments and inhibition by gelsolin of polymerization at barbed ends. The time course of depolymerization revealed an initial lag phase that was followed by slow decrease of the concentration of polymeric actin to reach the final steady state polymer and monomer concentration. The initial lag phase was pronounced at low free calcium and low gelsolin concentrations. On the basis of quantitative analysis the kinetics of depolymerization could be interpreted as capping, i.e. binding of gelsolin to the barbed ends of actin filaments and subsequent inhibition of polymerization, rather than severing. The main argument for this conclusion was that even gelsolin concentrations (100 nM) that exceed the concentration of filament ends ( approximately 2 nM), cause the filaments to depolymerize at a rate that is similar to the rate of depolymerization of the concentration of pointed ends existing before addition of gelsolin. The rate of capping is directly proportional to the free calcium concentration. These experiments demonstrate that at micromolar and submicromolar free calcium concentrations gelsolin acts as a calcium-regulated capping protein but not as an actin filament severing protein, and that the calcium binding sites of gelsolin which regulate the various functions of gelsolin (capping, severing and monomer binding), differ in their calcium affinity.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Slow axonal transport of soluble actin with actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin, and profilin suggests actin moves in an unassembled form.

We examined the axonal transport of actin and its monomer binding proteins, actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin, and profilin, in the chicken sciatic nerve following injection of [35S]methionine into the lumbar spinal cord. At intervals up to 20 days after injection, nerves were cut into 1-cm segments and separated into Triton X-100-soluble and particulate fractions. Actin and its binding proteins were then isolated by affinity chromatography on DNase I-Sepharose and by one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fluorographic analysis showed that the specific activity of soluble actin was two to three times that of its particulate form and that soluble actin, cofilin, actin depolymerizing factor, and profilin were transported at similar rates in slow component b of axonal flow. Our data strongly support the view that the mobile form of actin in slow transport is soluble and that a substantial amount of this actin may travel as a complex with actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin, and profilin. Along labeled nerves the specific activity of the unphosphorylated form of actin depolymerizing factor, which binds actin, was not significantly different from that of its "inactive" phosphorylated form. This constancy in specific activity suggests that continuous inactivation and reactivation of actin depolymerizing factor occur during transport, which could contribute to the exchange of soluble actin with the filamentous actin pool.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

[Cytoskeletal actin and its associated proteins. Some examples in Protista].

Many processes, cell motility being an example, require cells to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in response to both intracellular and extracellular signals. Reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton involves the rapid disassembly and reassembly of actin filaments, a phenomenon regulated by the action of particular actin-binding proteins. In recent years, an interest in studying actin regulation in unicellular organisms has arisen. Parasitic protozoan are among these organisms and studies of the cytoskeleton functions of these protozoan are relevant related to either cell biology or pathogenicity. To discuss recent data in this field, a symposium concerning "Actin and actin-binding proteins in protists" was held on May 8-11 in Paris, France, during the XXXV meeting of the French Society of Protistology. As a brief summary of the symposium we report here findings concerning the in vitro actin dynamic assembly, as well as the characterization of several actin-binding proteins from the parasitic protozoan Entamoeba histolytica, Trichomonas vaginalis and Plasmodium knowlesi. In addition, localization of actin in non-pathogen protists such as Prorocentrum micans and Crypthecodinium cohnii is also presented. The data show that some actin-binding proteins facilitate organization of filaments into higher order structures as pseudopods, while others have regulatory functions, indicating very particular roles for actin-binding proteins. One of the proteins discussed during the symposium, the actin depolymerizing factor ADF, was shown to enhance the treadmilling rate of actin filaments. In vitro, ADF binds to the ADP-bound forms of G-actin and F-actin, thereby participating in and changing the rate of actin assembly. Biochemical approaches allowed the identification of a protein complex formed by HSP/C70-cap32-34 which might also be involved in depolymerization of F-actin in P. knowlesi. Molecular and cellular approaches were used to identify proteins such as ABP-120 and myosin IB at the leading edge of E. histolytica. ABP-120 organizes F-actin in a network and myosin IB participates in the pseudopod formation. Similar approaches using T. vaginalis resulted in the discovery of an actin-binding protein that participate in the F-actin reorganization during adhesion of parasites to target cells. This protein is homologous to alpha-actinin from other eukaryotic cells. Finally, by using cell biology approaches, F-actin was observed in the cytoplasm as well as in the nucleus of Dinoflagellates. The recent developments in the molecular genetics of protozoa will provide new insights to understand the roles of actin-binding proteins during cytoskeleton activities.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Actin-destabilizing factors disrupt filaments by means of a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin, one of the most highly conserved and abundant eukaryotic proteins, is constantly being polymerized and depolymerized within cells as part of cellular motility, tissue formation and repair, and embryonic development. Many proteins exist that bind to monomeric or filamentous (F) forms of actin to regulate the polymerization state. It has become increasingly apparent that the ability of different proteins to bind to and regulate actin filament dynamics depends on the ability of the filament to exist in altered conformations. Yet, little is known about how these conformational changes occur at the molecular level. We have destabilized F-actin filaments by forming a disulfide that locks the "hydrophobic plug" to the body of the actin subunit or by altering the C terminus of actin with a tetramethylrhodamine label. We also examined F-actin filaments at short times after the initiation of polymerization. In all three cases, a substantial fraction of protomers can be found in a "tilted" state that also is induced by actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins. These observations suggest that F-actin filaments are annealed over time into a stable filament and that actin-depolymerizing proteins can effect a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Isolation and characterization of cDNA encoding the alpha subunit of Cap Z(36/32), an actin-capping protein from the Z line of skeletal muscle.

cDNA encoding the alpha chain of Cap Z has been isolated by screening a lambda gt11 library with affinity-purified antibodies. A single cDNA insert (designated CE2) of 2153 base pairs (bp) contains an open reading frame of 836 bp, which is incomplete at its 5' end. The technique of "rapid amplification of cDNA ends" has been used to extend the 5' end of this open reading frame to a potential transcription initiation site that is preceded by 320 bp of an apparently untranslated region. The protein predicted by the resulting nucleotide sequence has a Mr of 32,960 and contains four regions that show close homology with four alpha-chymotryptic digestion fragments of the alpha chain. The amino acid composition of the alpha chain of Cap Z and the predicted protein are also similar. Northern blot analysis of whole chicken embryos shows two mRNA species of 1.9 and 2.4 kilobases, respectively, that hybridize with CE2. Three potential polyadenylylation signals in two regions of CE2 460 bp apart are identified, suggesting that the two messages may result from the use of alternative polyadenylylation sites. Comparison of the sequence data with that of other known actin-capping and severing proteins shows no significant homologies, suggesting that Cap Z may be a member of a unique group of capping, nonsevering proteins.

Actin Capping Proteins↗

Pollen specific expression of maize genes encoding actin depolymerizing factor-like proteins.

In pollen development, a dramatic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton takes place during the passage of the pollen grain into dormancy and on activation of pollen tube growth. A role for actin-binding proteins is implicated and we report here the identification of a small gene family in maize that encodes actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)-like proteins. The ADF group of proteins are believed to control actin polymerization and depolymerization in response to both intracellular and extracellular signals. Two of the maize genes ZmABP1 and ZmABP2 are expressed specifically in pollen and germinating pollen suggesting that the protein products may be involved in pollen actin reorganization. A third gene, ZmABP3, encodes a protein only 56% and 58% identical to ZmABP1 and ZmABP2, respectively, and its expression is suppressed in pollen and germinated pollen. The fundamental biochemical characteristics of the ZmABP proteins has been elucidated using bacterially expressed ZmABP3 protein. This has the ability to bind monomeric actin (G-actin) and filamentous actin (F-actin). Moreover, it decreases the viscosity of polymerized actin solutions consistent with an ability to depolymerize filaments. These biochemical characteristics, taken together with the sequence comparisons, support the inclusion of the ZmABP proteins in the ADF group.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Reactivation of phosphorylated actin depolymerizing factor and identification of the regulatory site.

Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) occurs naturally in two forms, one of which contains a phosphorylated Ser and does not bind G-actin or depolymerize F-actin. Removal of this phosphate in vitro by alkaline phosphatase restores full F-actin depolymerizing activity. To identify the phosphorylation site, [32P]pADF was purified and digested with endoproteinase Lys-C. The digest contained only one 32P-labeled peptide. Further digestion with endoproteinase Asp-N and mass spectrometric analysis showed that this peptide came from the N terminus of ADF. Alkaline phosphatase treatment of one Asp-N peptide (mass 753) converted it to a peptide of mass 673, demonstrating that this peptide contains the phosphate group. Tandem mass spectrometric sequence analysis of this peptide identified the phosphorylated Ser as the encoded Ser3 (Ser2 in the processed protein). HeLa cells, transfected with either chick wild-type ADF cDNA or a cDNA mutated to code for Ala in place of Ser24 or Thr25, express and phosphorylate the exogenous ADF. Cells also expressed high levels of mutant ADF when Ser3 was deleted or converted to either Ala or Glu. However, none of these mutants was phosphorylated, confirming that Ser3 in the encoded ADF is the single in vivo regulatory site.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Differential regulation of actin depolymerizing factor and cofilin in response to alterations in the actin monomer pool.

Myoblasts, transfected with a human gene encoding a beta-actin point mutation, down-regulate expression of actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) and its mRNA. Regulation is posttranscriptional. Expression of cofilin, a structurally similar protein, and profilin, CapG, and tropomodulin is not altered with increasing mutant beta-actin expression. Myoblasts expressing either human gamma-actin or the mutant beta-actin down-regulate the endogenous mouse actin genes to keep a constant level of actin mRNA, whereas the gamma-actin transfectants do not down-regulate ADF. Thus, ADF expression is regulated differently from actin expression. The mutant beta-actin binds to ADF with about the same affinity as normal actin; however, it does not assemble into normal actin filaments. The decrease in ADF expression correlates with an increase in the unassembled actin pool. When the actin monomer pool in untransfected myoblasts is increased 70% by treatment with latrunculin A, synthesis of ADF and actin are down-regulated compared with cofilin and 19 other proteins selected at random. Increasing the actin monomer pool also results in nearly complete phosphorylation of both ADF and cofilin. Thus, ADF and cofilin are coordinately regulated by posttranslational modification, but their expression is differentially regulated. Furthermore, expression of ADF is responsive to the utilization of actin by the cell.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Two Caenorhabditis elegans actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins, encoded by the unc-60 gene, differentially regulate actin filament dynamics.

The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-60 gene encodes two actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins which are implicated in the regulation of actin filament assembly in body wall muscle. We examined the interaction of recombinant UNC-60A and B proteins with actin and found that they differentially regulate actin filament dynamics. Co-pelleting assays with F-actin showed that UNC-60A depolymerized but did not remain bound to F-actin, whereas UNC-60B bound to but did not depolymerize F-actin. In the pH range of 6.8-8.0, the apparent activities of UNC-60A and B did not change although UNC-60A showed greater actin-depolymerizing activity at higher pH. These activities were further confirmed by a light scattering assay and electron microscopy. The effects of these proteins on actin polymerization were quite different. UNC-60A inhibited polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other hand, UNC-60B strongly inhibited the nucleation process but accelerated the following elongation step. However, an excess amount of UNC-60B increased the amount of unpolymerized actin. These results indicate that UNC-60A depolymerizes actin filaments and inhibits actin polymerization, whereas UNC-60B strongly binds to F-actin without depolymerizing it and, through binding to G-actin, changes the rate of actin polymerization depending on the UNC-60B:actin ratio. These data suggest that the two UNC-60 isoforms play differential roles in regulating actin filament dynamics in vivo.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

The C-terminal tail of UNC-60B (actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin) is critical for maintaining its stable association with F-actin and is implicated in the second actin-binding site.

Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin changes the twist of actin filaments by binding two longitudinally associated actin subunits. In the absence of an atomic model of the ADF/cofilin-F-actin complex, we have identified residues in ADF/cofilin that are essential for filament binding. Here, we have characterized the C-terminal tail of UNC-60B (a nematode ADF/cofilin isoform) as a novel determinant for its association with F-actin. Removal of the C-terminal isoleucine (Ile152) by carboxypeptidase A or truncation by mutagenesis eliminated F-actin binding activity but strongly enhanced actin depolymerizing activity. Replacement of Ile152 by Ala had a similar but less marked effect; F-actin binding was weakened and depolymerizing activity slightly enhanced. Truncation of both Arg151 and Ile152 or replacement of Arg151 with Ala also abolished F-actin binding and enhanced depolymerizing activity. Loss of F-actin binding in these mutants was accompanied by loss or greatly decreased severing activity. All of the variants of UNC-60B interacted with G-actin in an indistinguishable manner from wild type. Cryoelectron microscopy showed that UNC-60B changed the twist of F-actin to a similar extent to vertebrate ADF/cofilins. Helical reconstruction and structural modeling of UNC-60B-F-actin complex reveal how the C terminus of UNC-60B might be involved in one of the two actin-binding sites.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

V-1, a protein expressed transiently during murine cerebellar development, regulates actin polymerization via interaction with capping protein.

V-1 is a 12-kDa protein consisting of three consecutive ANK repeats, which are believed to serve as the surface for protein-protein interactions. It is thought to have a role in neural development for its temporal profile of expression during murine cerebellar development, but its precise role remains unknown. Here we applied the proteomic approach to search for protein targets that interact with V-1. The V-1 cDNA attached with a tandem affinity purification tag was expressed in the cultured 293T cells, and the protein complex formed within the cells were captured and characterized by mass spectrometry. We detected two polypeptides specifically associated with V-1, which were identified as the alpha and beta subunits of the capping protein (CP, alternatively called CapZ or beta-actinin). CP regulates actin polymerization by capping the barbed end of the actin filament. The V-1.CP complex was detected not only in cultured cells transfected with the V-1 cDNA but also endogenously in cells as well as in murine cerebellar extracts. An analysis of the V-1/CP interaction by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy showed that V-1 formed a stable complex with the CP heterodimer with a dissociation constant of 1.2 x 10(-7) m and a molecular stoichiometry of approximately 1:1. In addition, V-1 inhibited the CP-regulated actin polymerization in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, our results suggest that V-1 is a novel component that regulates the dynamics of actin polymerization by interacting with CP and thereby participates in a variety of cellular processes such as actin-driven cell movements and motility during neuronal development.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Arabidopsis capping protein (AtCP) is a heterodimer that regulates assembly at the barbed ends of actin filaments.

The precise regulation of actin filament polymerization and depolymerization is essential for many cellular processes and is choreographed by a multitude of actin-binding proteins (ABPs). In higher plants the number of well characterized ABPs is quite limited, and some evidence points to significant differences in the biochemical properties of apparently conserved proteins. Here we provide the first evidence for the existence and biochemical properties of a heterodimeric capping protein from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtCP). The purified recombinant protein binds to actin filament barbed ends with Kd values of 12-24 nM, as assayed both kinetically and at steady state. AtCP prevents the addition of profilin actin to barbed ends during a seeded elongation reaction and suppresses dilution-mediated depolymerization. It does not, however, sever actin filaments and does not have a preference for the source of actin. During assembly from Mg-ATP-actin monomers, AtCP eliminates the initial lag period for actin polymerization and increases the maximum rate of polymerization. Indeed, the efficiency of actin nucleation of 0.042 pointed ends created per AtCP polypeptide compares favorably with mouse CapZ, which has a maximal nucleation of 0.17 pointed ends per CapZ polypeptide. AtCP activity is not affected by calcium but is sensitive to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. We propose that AtCP is a major regulator of actin dynamics in plant cells that, together with abundant profilin, is responsible for maintaining a large pool of actin subunits and a surprisingly small population of F-actin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor.

Human actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin are pH-sensitive, actin-depolymerizing proteins. Although 72% identical in sequence, ADF has a much higher depolymerizing activity than cofilin at pH 8. To understand this, we solved the structure of human cofilin using nuclear magnetic resonance and compared it with human ADF. Important sequence differences between vertebrate ADF/cofilins were correlated with unique structural determinants in the F-actin-binding site to account for differences in biochemical activities of the two proteins. Cofilin has a short beta-strand at the C terminus, not found in ADF, which packs against strands beta3/beta4, changing the environment around Lys96, a residue essential for F-actin binding. A salt bridge involving His133 and Asp98 (Glu98 in ADF) may explain the pH sensitivity of human cofilin and ADF; these two residues are fully conserved in vertebrate ADF/cofilins. Chemical shift perturbations identified residues that (i) differ in their chemical environments between wild type cofilin and mutants S3D, which has greatly reduced G-actin binding, and K96Q, which does not bind F-actin; (ii) are affected when G-actin binds cofilin; and (iii) are affected by pH change from 6 to 8. Many residues affected by G-actin binding also show perturbation in the mutants or in response to pH. Our evidence suggests the involvement of residues 133-138 of strand beta5 in all of the activities examined. Because residues in beta5 are perturbed by mutations that affect both G-actin and F-actin binding, this strand forms a "boundary" or "bridge" between the proposed F- and G-actin-binding sites.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Capping protein binding to S100B: implications for the tentacle model for capping the actin filament barbed end.

S100B binds tightly to a 12-amino acid peptide derived from heterodimeric capping protein. In native intact capping protein, this sequence is in the C terminus of the alpha-subunit, which is important for capping the actin filament. This C-terminal region is proposed to act as a flexible "tentacle," extending away from the body of capping protein in order to bind actin. To this hypothesis, we analyzed the interaction between S100B and capping protein in solution. The C-terminal 28 amino acids of the alpha-subunit, the proposed tentacle, bound to S100B as a free synthetic peptide or a glutathione S-transferase fusion (K(d) approximately 0.4-1 microm). In contrast, S100B did not bind to whole native capping protein or functionally affect its capping activity. S100B does not bind, with any significant affinity, to the proposed alpha-tentacle sequence of whole native capping protein in solution. In the NMR structure of S100B complexed with the alpha-subunit-derived 12-amino acid peptide, the hydrophobic side of a short alpha-helix in the peptide, containing an important tryptophan residue, contacts S100B. In the x-ray structure of native capping protein, the corresponding sequence of the alpha-subunit C terminus, including Trp(271), interacts closely with the body of the protein. Therefore, our results suggest the alpha-subunit C terminus is not mobile as predicted by the tentacle model. Addition of non-ionic detergent allowed whole capping protein to bind weakly to S100B, indicating that the alpha-subunit C terminus can be mobilized from the surface of the capping protein molecule, presumably by weakening the hydrophobic binding at the contact site.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Microscopic evidence that actin-interacting protein 1 actively disassembles actin-depolymerizing factor/Cofilin-bound actin filaments.

Actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin and gelsolin are the two major factors to enhance actin filament disassembly. Actin-interacting protein 1 (AIP1) enhances fragmentation of ADF/cofilin-bound filaments and caps the barbed ends. However, the mechanism by which AIP1 disassembles ADF/cofilin-bound filaments is not clearly understood. Here, we directly observed the effects of these proteins on filamentous actin by fluorescence microscopy and gained novel insight into the function of ADF/cofilin and AIP1. ADF/cofilin severed filaments and AIP1 strongly enhanced disassembly at nanomolar concentrations. However, gelsolin, gelsolin-actin complex, or cytochalasin D did not enhance disassembly by ADF/cofilin, suggesting that the strong activity of AIP1 cannot be explained by simple barbed end capping. Barbed end capping by ADF/cofilin and AIP1 was weak and allowed filament elongation, whereas gelsolin or gelsolin-actin complex strongly capped and inhibited elongation. These results suggest that AIP has an active role in filament severing or depolymerization and that ADF/cofilin and AIP1 are distinct from gelsolin in modulating filament elongation.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗