Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with colestipol: a bile sequestrating agent.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adolescent↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Colestipol”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Response of hyperlipoproteinemia to colestipol.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anticholesteremic Agents↗
Controlled clinical trial of a new bile acid-sequestering resin, colestipol, in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Effects of colestipol, a new bile-acid-sequestering resin, on cholesterol metabolism in man.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Primary hypercholesterolemia: effect of treatment on serum lipids, lipoprotein fractions, cholesterol absorption, sterol balance, and platelet aggregation.
The nonabsorbable bile acid sequestrant resin, colestipol, was administered to 16 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, and its effect on serum lipids, lipoprotein fractions, and circulating platelet aggregate ratio and platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was compared with that of sitosterol. Cholesterol absorption and sterol balance studies were done in four of the subjects during the following treatment periods: diet alone, colestipol, and sitosterol. Total serum cholesterol was significantly reduced by colestipol but only slightly decreased by sitosterol. Combination treatment with colestipol and sitosterol was associated with a smaller decrease in serum cholesterol than was demonstrated with colestipol alone. Serum triglycerides tended to increase during colestipol therapy (this increase was not clinically significant) but showed a minimal nonsignificant decrease with sitosterol treatment. Colestipol decreased cholesterol absorption, whereas sitosterol slightly increased it. Fecal sterol excretion was increased with colestipol treatment but was minimally affected by administration of sitosterol. Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly decreased with colestipol treatment. The circulating platelet aggregate ratio was significantly lower in the group of patients with hypercholesterolemia who received colestipol initially than in control subjects, but platelet aggregation in response to ADP was not significantly different between these two groups. No significant change in platelet aggregation was noted during colestipol or sitosterol treatment despite a significant decrease in total serum cholesterol with colestipol therapy, a suggestion that the platelet and lipid abnormalities are not interrelated.
Adenosine Diphosphate↗
Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on coronary atherosclerosis among men at high risk for cardiovascular events was assessed by quantitative arteriography. Of 146 men no more than 62 years of age who had apolipoprotein B levels greater than or equal to 125 mg per deciliter, documented coronary artery disease, and a family history of vascular disease, 120 completed the 2 1/2-year double-blind study, which included arteriography at base line and after treatment. Patients were given dietary counseling and were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: lovastatin (20 mg twice a day) and colestipol (10 g three times a day); niacin (1 g four times a day) and colestipol (10 g three times a day); or conventional therapy with placebo (or colestipol if the low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level was elevated). RESULTS: The levels of LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol changed only slightly in the conventional-therapy group (mean changes, -7 and +5 percent, respectively), but more substantially among patients treated with lovastatin and colestipol (-46 and +15 percent) or niacin and colestipol (-32 and +43 percent). In the conventional-therapy group, 46 percent of the patients had definite lesion progression (and no regression) in at least one of nine proximal coronary segments; regression was the only change in 11 percent. By comparison, progression (as the only change) was less frequent among patients who received lovastatin and colestipol (21 percent) and those who received niacin and colestipol (25 percent), and regression was more frequent (lovastatin and colestipol, 32 percent; niacin and colestipol, 39 percent; P less than 0.005). Multivariate analysis indicated that a reduction in the level of apolipoprotein B (or LDL cholesterol) and in systolic blood pressure, and an increase in HDL cholesterol correlated independently with regression of coronary lesions. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization for worsening symptoms) occurred in 10 of 52 patients assigned to conventional therapy, as compared with 3 of 46 assigned to receive lovastatin and colestipol and 2 of 48 assigned to receive niacin and colestipol (relative risk of an event during intensive treatment, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In men with coronary artery disease who were at high risk for cardiovascular events, intensive lipid-lowering therapy reduced the frequency of progression of coronary lesions, increased the frequency of regression, and reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events.
Adult↗
Combination drug therapy for familial combined hyperlipidemia.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of gemfibrozil and colestipol with gemfibrozil and lovastatin in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: An outpatient clinical research center in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia documented by studies of first-degree relatives; nine patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia, and eight patients with type 4 hyperlipoproteinemia. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels were obtained during control periods on diet alone and on gemfibrozil therapy. Patients then received gemfibrozil and colestipol or gemfibrozil and lovastatin in a randomized order. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia, gemfibrozil alone significantly reduced total cholesterol by 11%, and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-apolipoprotein B by 18%, did not change LDL-cholesterol, and raised high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels by 26%. Addition of either colestipol or lovastatin reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 17% and 25%, respectively, compared to gemfibrozil alone. However, colestipol mitigated the HDL-cholesterol raising effect of gemfibrozil and did not further reduce LDL-apolipoprotein B levels. In contrast, addition of lovastatin caused an additional reduction of LDL-apolipoprotein B 19% compared with gemfibrozil alone. In patients with type 4 hyperlipoproteinemia, gemfibrozil alone reduced triglycerides by 40%, raised HDL-cholesterol by 26%, and increased LDL-cholesterol levels by 29%. The addition of either colestipol or lovastatin reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 34% and 33%, respectively (compared with gemfibrozil alone), but greater reductions of LDL-apolipoprotein B (30% with lovastatin compared with 15% with colestipol, compared with gemfibrozil alone), and increases in HDL-cholesterol levels (8% increase with lovastatin compared with 10% decrease with colestipol, compared to gemfibrozil alone) were seen with the lovastatin combination. CONCLUSIONS: Although gemfibrozil with either colestipol or lovastatin favorably altered lipoprotein levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia, the combination of gemfibrozil and lovastatin appeared superior overall.
Adult↗
Evidence for a new pathophysiological mechanism for coronary artery disease regression: hepatic lipase-mediated changes in LDL density.
BACKGROUND: Small, dense LDL particles are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and predict angiographic changes in response to lipid-lowering therapy. Intensive lipid-lowering therapy in the Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (FATS) resulted in significant improvement in CAD. This study examines the relationship among LDL density, hepatic lipase (HL), and CAD progression, identifying a new biological mechanism for the favorable effects of lipid-altering therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-eight of the subjects in FATS with documented coronary disease, apolipoprotein B levels >/=125 mg/dL, and family history of CAD were selected for this study. They were randomly assigned to receive lovastatin (40 mg/d) and colestipol (30 g/d), niacin (4 g/d) and colestipol, or conventional therapy with placebo alone or with colestipol in those with elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Plasma hepatic lipase (HL), lipoprotein lipase, and LDL density were measured when subjects were and were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. LDL buoyancy increased with lovastatin-colestipol therapy (7.7%; P<0.01) and niacin-colestipol therapy (10.3%; P<0.01), whereas HL decreased in both groups (-14% [P<0.01] and -17% [P<0.01] with lovastatin-colestipol and niacin-colestipol, respectively). Changes in LDL buoyancy and HL activity were associated with changes in disease severity (P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, an increase in LDL buoyancy was most strongly associated with CAD regression, accounting for 37% of the variance of change in coronary stenosis (P<0.01), followed by reduction in apolipoprotein Bl (5% of variance; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These studies support the hypothesis that therapy-associated changes in HL alter LDL density, which favorably influences CAD progression. This is a new and potentially clinically relevant mechanism linking lipid-altering therapy to CAD improvement.
Aged↗
Atorvastatin, a New HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, Does Not Affect Glucocorticoid Hormones in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia.
BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin calcium (Lipitor) is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. The present study was conducted to examine the effect of pronounced cholesterol lowering on adrenal function in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adrenal function was examined under basal conditions and following adrenal corticotropin hormone stimulation in 40 patients (36 with heterogeneous familial and 4 with polygenic hypercholesterolemia). The study was part of a larger study comparing the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, colestipol, atorvastatin + colestipol, and simvastatin + colestipol treatment over a 1-year period. Maximum doses of all agents were studied: 80 mg atorvastatin once daily, 40 mg simvastatin once daily, and 20 g/day colestipol. At the end of the 1-year treatment period, reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 57%, 54%, and 49% for the atorvastatin, colestipol + atorvastatin, and colestipol + simvastatin groups, respectively. No clinically significant changes in basal serum cortisol levels were seen in any treatment group during the 1-year treatment period. Mean serum cortisol concentrations and area under the curve for cortisol concentration versus time data following adrenal corticotropin hormone stimulation were not clinically different during treatment compared with values obtained at baseline for any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with maximum doses of atorvastatin for 1-year did not have any adverse effects on adrenal function under basal conditions or during maximum stimulation. Similarly, colestipol therapy alone and in combination with either atorvastatin or simvastatin did not appear to affect adrenal function.
Journal Article↗
Comparative studies on the influence of different fibrates on serum lipoproteins in endogenous hyperlipoproteinaemia.
Two trials have been performed in the same patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types IIb (12 cases), III (6 cases) and IV (11 cases). In the first study the lipid-lowering properties of bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate were compared and in a separate trial the influence of combined treatment with gemfibrozil plus colestipol and bezafibrate plus probucol on lipoproteins were investigated. The mean percentage lipid-lowering effect of each fibrate on serum and VLDL fraction was significant in the Types IIb, III and IV patients, but there were significant differences between the fibrates. In general, gemfibrozil and bezafibrate decreased plasma lipid levels more than etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate in Type IIb patients. In Type IV cases gemfibrozil and bezafibrate were significantly potent in reducing the triglyceride level than fenofibrate, etofibrate or etofylline clofibrate. All the fibrates produced an increase in HDL cholesterol, but there were significant differences between them were in the Type IV patients. The influence of fibrates on the LDL fraction was much more variable. In hyperlipoproteinaemia Type IIb, a decrease in both LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B was observed. In Type III and IV patients, however, an increase in LDL concentration occurred. The addition of colestipol to gemfibrozil therapy led to a further decrease in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B in Type IIb patients. In patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types III and IV colestipol prevented the increase in LDL concentration after treatment with gemfibrozil alone. The effect of probucol on LDL cholesterol was comparable to that of colestipol. Combined treatment with gemfibrozil and colestipol caused an increase in HDL cholesterol concentration in contrast to combined treatment with bezafibrate and probucol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adult↗
Normalization of low-density-lipoprotein levels in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with a combined drug regimen.
We studied the effect of th bite acid sequestrant colestipol, alone and in combination with clofibrate or niacin, in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who were given a diet low in cholesterol and saturated fat. With colestipol alone, mean cholesterol levels in serum decreased 16 to 25 per cent. The addition of clofibrate produced a total mean decrement of only 28 per cent. In contrast, serum cholesterol levels fell 45 per cent when colestipol as combined with niacin. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreased 55 per cent with colestipol and niacin, whereas high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased. Mean LDL cholesterol was lower in patients given this regimen than in matched normal controls eating an unrestricted diet. Tendinous xanthomas, measured by quantitative xeroradiography, were significantly reduced (P < 0.01), indicating that this regimen mobilized cholesterol from tissue pools with slow turnover. Colestipol plus niacin promises to be useful in the treatment of patients at high risk from elevated levels of LDL.
Adult↗
Effects of resins and activated charcoal on the absorption of digoxin, carbamazepine and frusemide.
1. The interference of resins and activated charcoal with the absorption of digoxin, carbamazepine and frusemide was studied. 2. In a cross-over study consisting of four phases, single doses of colestipol hydrochloride (10 g), cholestyramine (8 g), activated charcoal (8 g) or water only were given to six healthy volunteers immediately after the simultaneous ingestion of digoxin (0.25 mg), carbamazepine (400 mg) and frusemide (40 mg). Plasma and urine concentrations of the test drugs and the urine volumes were determined up to 72 h. 3. The absorption of digoxin was not reduced by colestipol, moderately (30-40%, P less than 0.05) reduced by cholestyramine and greatly (96%) by charcoal. 4. The absorption of carbamazepine was not decreased by cholestyramine, slightly (10%) by colestipol and greatly (90%) by activated charcoal. 5. The absorption and the diuretic effect of frusemide were significantly diminished by all agents. The bioavailability was reduced by colestipol 80%, by cholestyramine 95% and by activated charcoal 99.5%. 6. The interference with the gastrointestinal absorption of most of the basic drugs by colestipol and cholestyramine seems to be minimal. On the other hand, the resins may seriously impair the absorption of certain acidic drugs, for example frusemide.
Adult↗
Nonisotopic method for estimating cholesterogenesis in the rat.
Influence of several compounds on sterol production was determined from serum desmosterol (D) levels in rats treated with U-18666A:3beta-(2-diethylaminoethoxy) androst-5-en-17-one HCl. U-18666A blocks biosynthesis of cholesterol (C) by inhibiting conversion from D to C. Diets containing C (2%), the bile acid sequestrant colestipol HCl (1%), clofibrate (0.2%), combination of colestipol HCl and clofibrate, or basal diet were fed to normal or U-18666A (3 mg/kg/d) mald rats for 2 weeks. In normal rats, C feeding increased serum C levels (39%), colestipol HC l had no significant effect, while clofibrate or the combination with colestipated rats, C feeding reduced D concentration (30 to 13 mg/dl) indicating inhibition of synthesis via negative feedback system. Colestipol HCl increased D level (33%) and reduced C (60%) indicating increased synthesis; results are compatible with an agent capable of binding bile acids in the rat which can compensate for loss of these acids by increasing sterol synthesis. Compared to control, clofibrate reduced serum C (33%) and D (43%); in combination with colestipol HCl it inhibited the increased synthesis caused by the latter. Clofibrate appears to be an inhibitor of C biosynthesis. Also, tests with other compounds make it apparent that the U-18666A-treated rat model system can be useful in evaluating cholesterogenesis.
Androstenes↗
Cutting into cholesterol. Cost-effective alternatives for treating hypercholesterolemia.
We performed an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treating individuals with significantly elevated levels of total serum cholesterol (greater than 6.85 mmol/L [greater than 265 mg/dL], comparing treatment with three alternative agents: cholestyramine resin, colestipol, and oat bran (a soluble fiber). We simulated a program for lowering cholesterol levels that was similar to that of the Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, and then used the outcomes of the trial to calculate the incremental cost per year of life saved (YOLS) from the perspective of society. Our findings suggest that the cost per YOLS ranges from $117,400 (cholestyramine resin packets) to $70,900 (colestipol packets) and $17,800 (oat bran). Using bulk drug reduces the cost per YOLS to $65,100 (cholestyramine resin) and $63,900 (colestipol). Targeting bulk colestipol treatment only to smokers has a cost per YOLS of $47,010; the incremental cost of treating nonsmokers would be $89,600 per additional YOLS. Although pharmacologic therapy has substantial costs, it may be more cost-effective when low-cost forms are applied to particular high-risk groups, such as smokers. However, a broad public health approach to lowered cholesterol levels by additional dietary modification, such as with soluble fiber, may be preferred to a medically oriented campaign that focuses on drug therapy.
Cholestyramine Resin↗
A randomized pilot trial of low-dose combination lipid-lowering therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting.
Vein graft atherosclerosis is a common and serious complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is mounting evidence that lipoprotein abnormalities play an equally important role in the development of lesions in saphenous vein grafts after CABG as in native coronary vessel disease. The potential benefit of low-dose lipid lowering combination therapy in these patients has not been investigated. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the efficacy and safety of a low-dose combination of colestipol 10 g and simvastatin 10 mg/day (CS) to colestipol 10 mg and bezafibrate 400 mg/day (CB) for 2 months in 33 patients with serum total cholesterol > 6.5 mmol/l and triglyceride < 4.5 mmol/l who had undergone CABG for severe coronary artery disease. In the CS group, total cholesterol decreased by 29% and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 42%; similarly, CB reduced total cholesterol by 17%, LDL cholesterol by 23%, triglyceride by 19%, and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 14%. Lipoprotein (a) and hemostatic factors were unaffected by either therapy in this study. Both combination therapies were well tolerated with no significant clinical or biochemical side effects. We conclude that low-dose combinations of colestipol and simvastatin or colestipol and bezafibrate are effective and well tolerated in the management of moderate hyperlipidemia in patients who had undergone CABG.
Analysis of Variance↗
Aluminum accumulation and membrane fluidity alteration in synaptosomes isolated from rat brain cortex following aluminum ingestion: effect of cholesterol.
In the present work, we studied the effect of cholesterol/phospholipid (CH/PL) molar ratio on aluminum accumulation and aluminum-induced alteration of membrane fluidity in rat brain cortex synaptosomes. We observed that sub-acute (daily supply of 1.00 g of AlCl(3) during 10 days) and chronic (daily supply of 0.03 g of AlCl(3) during 4 months) exposure to dietary aluminum leads to a synaptosomal aluminum enrichment of 45 and 59%, respectively. During chronic exposure to AlCl(3), the enhancement of aluminum content was prevented by administration of colestipol (0.31 g/day), which decreased the synaptosomal membrane CH/PL molar ratio (nmol/nmol) from 1.2 to 0.4. Fluorescence anisotropy analysis, using 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) and 1-(4-(trimethylamino)phenyl)-6-phenylhexa-1,3,5-triene (TMA-DPH), showed that after treatment with colestipol a decrease in membrane order occurs at the level of hydrophilic lipid-water surface and deeper hydrophobic region of the synaptosomal membrane. When the rats were exposed to aluminum, it was observed a significant enhancement of membrane fluidity, which was more pronounced at the level of the membrane hydrophilic regions. Meanwhile, when chronic exposure to dietary AlCl(3) was accompanied by treatment with colestipol, the aluminum-induced decrease in membrane order was negligible when compared to TMA-DPH and DPH anisotropy values measured upon colestipol treatment. In contrast, in vitro incubation of synaptosomes (isolated from control rats) with AlCl(3) induced a concentration-dependent rigidification of this more hydrophilic membrane region. The opposite action of aluminum on synaptosomal membrane fluidity, during in vivo and in vitro experiments, appears to be explained by alteration of synaptosomal CH/PL molar ratio, since a significant reduction (approximately 80%) of this parameter occurs during in vivo exposure to aluminum. In conclusion, during in vivo exposure to aluminum, fluidification of hydrophilic regions and reduction of CH/PL molar ratio of presynaptic membranes accompany the accumulation of this cation, which appear to restrict aluminum retention in brain cortex nerve terminals.
Aluminum↗
Effects of hypolipidemic therapy on cholesterol homeostasis in freshly isolated mononuclear cells from patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Freshly isolated mononuclear leukocytes have been reported to show changes in cholesterol synthesis and high-affinity degradation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) that parallel those that occur in the liver. To examine whether hypolipidemic therapy in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia influences cholesterol homeostasis in their mononuclear cells we assessed the effects of colestipol and nicotinic acid (alone and in combination) on the rates of high-affinity 125I-labeled LDL degradation and on the rates of cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis by freshly isolated cells. Rates of 125I-labeled LDL degradation were lower in mononuclear cells from patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia on no medication (3.1 ng per 4 X 10(6) cells per 5 hr) than in cells from normal control subjects (6.1 ng per 4 X 10(6) cells per 5 hr) and, in the former patients, the values were not significantly affected by therapy with nicotinic acid. In contrast, freshly isolated mononuclear cells from patients receiving colestipol degraded 125I-labeled LDL at near-normal rates (5.0 ng per 4 X 10(6) cells per 5 hr). The rates of cholesterol synthesis were also higher in mononuclear cells isolated from patients treated with colestipol than in cells from untreated patients or from those receiving nicotinic acid; in contrast the rate of synthesis of phosphatidylcholine did not show any consistent changes. Similar results were obtained in a smaller number of patients studied longitudinally, in which colestipol therapy significantly increased rates of cholesterol synthesis and high-affinity degradation of 125I-labeled LDL by freshly isolated mononuclear cells. We conclude that previously observed changes in cholesterol homeostasis in the liver of patients treated with bile acid sequestrants are paralleled by similar changes in freshly isolated mononuclear cells and that these cells offer an accessible model for further studies on how diet and pharmacologic agents influence cellular cholesterol homeostasis in humans.
Cholesterol↗
Procedures to enhance withdrawal of xenobiotics from chickens.
Egg- and meat-type chickens were fed diets containing 1 or 10 ppm of fireMaster (FF-1), a commercial mixture of polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), predominantly 2,4,5,2',4',5'-hexabromobiphenyl (6BB-4) and 2,3,4,5,2',4',5'-heptabromobiphenyl (7BB-8). These congeners account for approximately 65 and 14%, respectively, of the total mix. In three experiments, colestipol hydrochloride, a bile acid-binding resin, and mineral oil, alone or in combination with restricted feeding, were examined as procedures to enhance the removal of the PBBs. The combination of 50% dietary restriction plus a 10% dietary concentration of colestipol or mineral oil reduced body burdens of PBBs about 70% within 21 d for chickens previously fed 10 ppm PBBs. The use of feed restriction, colestipol, or mineral oil produced only borderline effects for hastening withdrawal. Chickens not treated showed only a 3% loss of PBBs during the withdrawal period. Colestipol at 2.5% in the diet in combination with feed restriction was not consistently effective in removing body burdens of PBB from chickens previously fed 1 or 10 ppm PBBs, indicating a dose-response effect. Chickens previously fed 1 ppm eliminated up to 40% of the PBBs in 21 d without any treatment, as compared to the 3% loss occurring after feeding with 10-ppm concentrations.
Adipose Tissue↗