Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACCREDITATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The accreditation status of student health services at academic medical centers.

BACKGROUND: Student health services (SHSs) on campuses with academic medical centers (AMCs; schools affiliated with teaching hospitals) often provide clinical services (including occupational health services) for students and staff. There are few aggregate data about the accreditation status of these health services. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey of SHSs at the 124 medical schools in the United States was conducted in spring 1999. SHSs were questioned about their accreditation status. RESULTS: One-hundred three SHSs were included in the survey. Forty-seven (46%) of the SHSs were accredited, 30 (64%) through the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and the remainder through the Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC). The Joint Commission predominated among private SHSs (13/15 [87%]), but public institutions were more evenly divided. Most of the SHSs accredited as freestanding ambulatory care centers were AAAHC accredited (16/27 [59%]). Nearly all the SHSs accredited as satellites of the AMCs were Joint Commission accredited. CONCLUSION: Although fewer than one-half of SHSs at AMCs are accredited either through the Joint Commission or AAAHC, this is a far higher percentage than of accredited SHSs in general (134/1,500 [9%]). The Joint Commission dominates as the accrediting body for SHSs at AMCs largely because of the high-proportion of services accredited as satellites of the AMCs. Although the accreditation process is costly and time-consuming and may appear daunting, SHSs at AMCs should pursue accreditation to ensure quality in health care processes.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1996

Can educational accreditation drive interdisciplinary learning in the health professions?

BACKGROUND: Accreditation in higher education serves as a means of assuring the public of academic program quality and of promoting continuing review and self-improvement by educational units. Educational program accreditation is a means of seeking continuous improvement in the academic activities of programs and institutions. Discussions of interdisciplinary education raise questions about the responsiveness of accreditation to such approaches. ACCREDITATION AS A STIMULUS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: Some health professions accrediting agencies have followed the lead of industry and have adapted their approach and philosophy of evaluation to a continuous improvement philosophy, while others continue to perpetuate an "inspection" mentality. The perpetuation of such an approach limits the value of the accreditation process. Accrediting agencies need to focus attention instead on stimulating professional preparation to develop in students the knowledge, skills, and competencies needed for health professions practice. Since such practice frequently occurs in team or interdisciplinary settings, the accreditation evaluation can support practice by incorporating an interdisciplinary perspective. THE CHALLENGES OF INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION FOR ACCREDITATION: As models of interdisciplinary education are developed in the health professions, accreditation will be challenged to evolve in its effectiveness to evaluate interdisciplinary learning experiences. The accrediting community will need to recognize the barriers posed by interdisciplinary learning, as well as the special skills and situations needed to offer effective interdisciplinary experiences. Without this perspective the usefulness of accreditation will be diminished. A CHARGE FOR THE FUTURE: Standards and procedures for accreditation will need to be revised to address the unique characteristics of interdisciplinary education. A set of mock accreditation standards to guide the evaluation of interdisciplinary health professions education learning experiences is proposed. Finally, questions are posed about the role of accreditation in the context of interdisciplinary health professions education.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2000

Accrediting organizations and quality improvement.

This paper reviews the various organizations in the United States that perform accreditation and establish standards for healthcare delivery. These agencies include the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), the American Medical Accreditation Program (AMAP), the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission/Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (AAHC/URAC), and the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory HealthCare (AAAHC). In addition, the Foundation for Accountability (FACCT) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) play important roles in ensuring the quality of healthcare. Each of the accrediting bodies is unique in terms of their mission, activities, compositions of their boards, and organizational histories, and each develops their own accreditation process and programs and sets their own accreditation standards. For this reason, certain accrediting organizations are better suited than others to perform accreditation for a specific area in the healthcare delivery system. The trend toward outcomes research is noted as a clear shift from the structural and process measures historically used by accrediting agencies. Accreditation has been generally viewed as a desirable process to establish standards and work toward achieving higher quality care, but it is not without limitations. Whether accrediting organizations are truly ensuring high quality healthcare across the United States is a question that remains to be answered.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2006

Accreditation of undergraduate medical training programs: practices in nine developing countries as compared with the United States.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: Undergraduate medical training program accreditation is practiced in many countries, but information from developing countries is sparse. We compared medical training program accreditation systems in nine developing countries, and compared these with accreditation practices in the United States of America (USA). METHODS: Medical program accreditation practices in nine developing countries were systematically analyzed using all available published documents. Findings were compared to USA accreditation practices. FINDINGS: Accreditation systems with explicitly defined criteria, standards and procedures exist in all nine countries studied: Argentina, India, Kenya, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines and South Africa. Introduction of accreditation processes is relatively recent, starting in 1957 in India to 2001 in Malaysia. Accrediting agencies were set up in these countries predominantly by their respective governments as a result of legislation and acts of Parliament, involving Ministries of Education and Health. As in the USA, accreditation: (1) serves as a quality assurance mechanism promoting professional and public confidence in the quality of medical education, (2) assists medical schools in attaining desired standards, and (3) ensures that graduates' performance complies with national norms. All nine countries follow similar accreditation procedures. Where mandatory accreditation is practiced, non-compliant institutions may be placed on probation, student enrollment suspended or accreditation withdrawn. CONCLUSION: Accreditation systems in several developing countries are similar to those in the developed world. Data suggest the trend towards instituting quality assurance mechanisms in medical education is spreading to some developing countries, although generalization to other areas of the world is difficult to ascertain.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2006

A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737].

BACKGROUND: Accreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted. METHODS/DESIGN: To understand the relationship between them a multi-method research approach is required which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data. The generic nature of accreditation standard development and inspection within different sectors enhances the extent to which the findings of in-depth study of accreditation process in one industry can be generalised to other industries. This paper presents a research design which comprises a prospective, multi-method, multi-level, multi-disciplinary approach to assess the validity, impact and value of accreditation. DISCUSSION: The accreditation program which assesses over 1,000 health services in Australia is used as an exemplar for testing this design. The paper proposes this design as a framework suitable for application to future international research into accreditation. Our aim is to stimulate debate on the role of accreditation and how to research it.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accreditation: The hallmark of educational quality.

CONTEXT: Although accreditation issues have received attention over time, an accurate examination of accreditation has been absent within the radiologic science literature. OBJECTIVE: Using a literature review format, this review will define accreditation, provide a historical review of accreditation and purposes, identify the types of accreditation, discuss the major issues related to accreditation and explain how accreditation has affected the radiologic sciences. RESULTS: Although there is a great deal of rhetoric about accreditation in the radiologic sciences, research to support a particular type of accreditation within the radiologic sciences is absent. SUMMARY: Accreditation programs continuously are reviewed and changed, and accreditation organizations constantly strive to improve quality. In the past, the radiologic sciences have been influenced by accreditation decisions. The potential for future accreditation decisions affecting the radiologic sciences profession is possible.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2002

The age of competence: an update on the international laboratory accreditation scene for veterinary testing laboratories.

Many changes have recently taken place in the world of laboratory accreditation. These changes include the increased use of voluntary standards in lieu of regulations, a move towards harmonization (equivalent results using voluntary standards) over standardization (using the same procedures or regulations), and an increased focus on competence, which includes the competence of laboratories to conduct testing, the competence of accreditation bodies to operate accreditation programs, the competence of bodies such as the National Cooperation for Laboratory Accreditation (NACLA) to recognize accreditation bodies as meeting the requirements of relevant standards, and the competence of organizations providing services to the accreditation process, such as the operation of proficiency testing programs. To describe these changes, a brief and general description of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation accreditation scheme is provided, including an update on relevant decisions and activities in the United States and a description of the organization and activities of the newly formed NACLA. Following this discussion, with emphasis on veterinary testing, is an overview of several national and international organizations, including accreditation bodies, that promote harmonization, standardization, and analytical excellence. Also outlined are relevant activities of these organizations, an overview of some of the standards and guidelines they produce, and a description of how such organizations interact with each other and with laboratories seeking recognition for competence. Next is a brief discussion of recent developments and trends in laboratory accreditation, the impact of these developments, and the costs and benefits of accreditation to laboratories. Suggestions to veterinary laboratories for formulating strategy for keeping current with developments in accreditation and for determining quality goals are included.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2002

Accreditation as an alternative to specialty recognition.

The Commission on Dental Accreditation does not currently accredit postdoctoral training in general anesthesia. This is related to the traditional linkage of accreditation of postdoctoral training programs to ADA specialty recognition. The aforementioned ADA Guidelines are important because they provide the foundation for the continued use of sedation and general anesthesia within dentistry. The one mechanism that would "ensure safety and effective use," maintain "a strong educational foundation," provide "access to adequate training ... develop programs at the postgraduate level" and support expansion of both basic and clinical research is CDA accreditation of postdoctoral programs. Prior to 1991, hen general anesthesia training was acquired by dentists primarily through accredited medical programs, there was little need for anything more than guidelines to protect the public. With the development of non-accredited dental anesthesiology programs in accredited dental schools (primarily in the late 1980's) and the loss of access to general anesthesia training in accredited medical anesthesiology residency programs in the summer of 1991, primary responsibility for all general anesthesia training of dentists shifted to organized dentistry. However, the ADA House declined to recognize dental anesthesiology as a dental specialty on three separate occasions even though the ADA Council on Dental Education felt all requirements were met and favorably recommended specialty recognition in all three instances. Specialty recognition would have provided the needed accreditation mechanism to validate dentistry's continued use of deep sedation and general anesthesia by those practitioners not classified as oral and maxillofacial surgeons. As an alternative to the specialty recognition process and in view of the need to accredit postdoctoral general anesthesia training for dentists, the American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists has recently requested the CDA offer accreditation for these dental programs. To address this issue and those of other non-ADA-recognized disciplines, the CDA is currently in the initial stages of developing requirements for accrediting non-ADA recognized postdoctoral training programs. This material will be circulated to communities of interest for their input. Details of the process will be forthcoming from ADA sources in the near future.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2002

Situation analysis of occupational and environmental health laboratory accreditation in Thailand.

The objective of this study was to analyze the current situation of laboratory accreditation (LA) in Thailand, especially on occupational and environmental health. The study integrated both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The response rate of the quantitative questionnaires was 54.5% (226/415). The majority of the responders was environmental laboratories located outside hospital and did not have proficiency testing. The majority used ISO 9000, ISO/IEC 17025 or ISO/ EEC Guide 25, and hospital accreditation (HA) as their quality system. However, only 30 laboratories were currently accredited by one of these systems. Qualitative research revealed that international standard for laboratory accreditation for both testing laboratory and calibration laboratory was ISO/IEC Guide 25, which has been currently revised to be ISO/IEC 17025. The National Accreditation Council (NAC) has authorized 2 organizations as Accreditation Bodies (ABs) for LA: Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Ministry of Industry, and Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health. Regarding LA in HA, HA considered clinical laboratory as only 1 of 31 items for accreditation. Obtaining HA might satisfy the hospital director and his management team, and hence might actually be one of the obstacles for the hospital to further improve their laboratory quality system and apply for ISO/IEC 17025 which was more technically oriented. On the other hand, HA may be viewed as a good start or even a pre-requisite for laboratories in the hospitals to further improve their quality towards ISO/IEC 17025. Interviewing the director of NAC and some key men in some large laboratories revealed several major problems of Thailand's LA. Both Thai Industrial Standards Institute and Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards did not yet obtain Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) with other international ABs. Several governmental bodies had their own standards and accreditation systems, and did not accept other bodies' standards and systems. This put a burden to private laboratories because they had to apply and get accredited from several governmental bodies, but still had to apply and get accredited from international ABs especially for those dealing with exports. There were only few calibration laboratories, not enough for supporting the calibration required for the equipment in testing laboratories' LA. Purchasing proficiency testing specimens from abroad was very expensive, and often got into troubles with the customs duty procedures. The authors recommend some strategies and activities to improve laboratory accreditation in Thailand. Improvement in occupational and environmental health laboratories would essentially be beneficial to laboratory accreditation of other areas such as clinical laboratory.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1995

Components of laboratory accreditation.

Accreditation or certification is a recognition given to an operation or product that has been evaluated against a standard; be it regulatory or voluntary. The purpose of accreditation is to provide the consumer with a level of confidence in the quality of operation (process) and the product of an organization. Environmental Protection Agency/OCM has proposed the development of an accreditation program under National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) laboratories as a supplement to the current program. This proposal was the result of the Inspector General Office reports that identified weaknesses in the current operation. Several accreditation programs can be evaluated and common components identified when proposing a structure for accrediting a GLP system. An understanding of these components is useful in building that structure. Internationally accepted accreditation programs provide a template for building a U.S. GLP accreditation program. This presentation will discuss the traditional structure of accreditation as presented in the Organization of Economic Cooperative Development/GLP program, ISO-9000 Accreditation and ISO/IEC Guide 25 Standard, and the Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories, which has a biological component. Most accreditation programs are managed by a recognized third party, either privately or with government oversight. Common components often include a formal review of required credentials to evaluate organizational structure, a site visit to evaluate the facility, and a performance evaluation to assess technical competence. Laboratory performance is measured against written standards and scored. A formal report is then sent to the laboratory indicating accreditation status. Usually, there is a scheduled reevaluation built into the program. Fee structures vary considerably and will need to be examined closely when building a GLP program.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1999

Responses of baccalaureate and graduate programs to the emergence of choice in nursing accreditation.

Specialized accreditation in nursing is a widely recognized and respected hallmark of program quality. The advent of a second specialized accrediting agency for baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing prompted a survey of these programs to determine their choice of nursing accreditation agency, factors influencing their choice, their perceptions of the value added by nursing accreditation, and the difficulties encountered with the accreditation process. These study variables and the relationships between choice of accrediting agency and types of degree-granting nursing education programs offered by the institution, agency membership in the National League of Nursing (NLN) or the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), expected date of next accreditation visit, geographic region, public versus private status, and type of institution (Carnegie classification) were analyzed. Findings revealed that nearly a quarter (24%) of respondents intend to continue with the NLN Accrediting Commission (NLNAC), whereas 30% indicated they have already switched to the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) or intend to do so prior to their next accreditation cycle. However, nearly a quarter (24%) of respondents said they plan to be accredited by both agencies for the immediate future, and 21% indicated they are still undecided. Study findings suggest an end to single-source accreditation, and the beginning of a new market-oriented approach.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2004

Allied health deans' and program directors' perspectives of specialized accreditation effectiveness and reform.

Criticisms, calls for change, and recommendations for specialized accreditation improvement have been made by individuals or groups external to the daily operations of allied health educational programs, frequently as opinion pieces or articles lacking a research foundation. While there is a great deal of concern related to specialized accreditation, little input has been provided from those within, and integral to, allied health educational programs affected by specialized accreditation standards. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of selected allied health deans and program directors regarding specialized accreditation effectiveness and reform. Survey research was used to study perspectives of allied health deans and program directors located in four-year colleges and universities and in academic health centers and medical schools. Surveys were mailed to program directors offering-programs in clinical laboratory sciences and medical technology, nuclear medicine technology, occupational therapy, physical therapy, radiation therapy, and radiography. Simultaneously, allied health deans located within these institutions were surveyed. A total of 773 surveys were mailed and 424 valid responses were received, yielding a response rate of 55%. The results affirmed the role of accreditation as an effective system for assuring quality in higher education. The role of specialized accreditation in improving the quality of allied health programs was clearly articulated by the respondents. Respondents voiced strong opposition to governmental or state-level requirements for accountability and emphasized the vital role of peer evaluators. Significant differences in deans' and program directors' perspectives related to specialized accreditation were evident. Whereas deans and program directors agreed with the purposes of specialized accreditation, they expressed less support for the process and effectiveness, and critique and reform, of specialized accreditation. Within those categories, deans were in greater support of critique and reform efforts related to specialized accreditation, while program directors were more supportive of the purpose, process, and effectiveness of specialized accreditation.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1999

Accreditation of postgraduate medical education in the United States and Canada: a comparison of two systems.

The systems for accrediting residency programmes in the United States and Canada, although they have developed independently in the two countries, have similar objectives and accreditation requirements. Both have become increasingly focused over the past several decades on the importance of educational programmes structured to provide graded professional responsibility with appropriate guidance and supervision to residents according to their level of training, ability and experience. The Canadian model used by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada is a centrist one, with accreditation decisions on all programmes in all specialties being vested in a single, multidisciplinary accreditation committee. The American model developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education is a distributive one, with accreditation decisions being vested in each specialty Residency Review Committee. In both models, accreditation is based on a system of periodic on-site visits during which both faculty and residents are interviewed by a surveyor to provide the accrediting body with a first-hand evaluation of the extent to which each accredited programme meets the standards of accreditation. While they are similar in purpose, there are significant differences in the operation of the two systems.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Program accreditation effect on paramedic credentialing examination success rate.

OBJECTIVES: Program accreditation is used to ensure the delivery of quality education and training for allied health providers. However, accreditation is not mandated for paramedic education programs. This study examined if there is a relationship between completion of an accredited paramedic education program and achieving a passing score on the National Registry Paramedic Certification Examination. METHODS: We used data from the National Registry Paramedic Certification Examination for calendar year 2002. Successful completion (passing) of the examination was defined as correctly answering a minimum of 126 out of 180 (70%) of the questions and meeting or exceeding the individual subtest passing scores. Accredited paramedic training programs were certified by the Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Professions (CoAEMSP) on or before January 1, 2002. Candidates reported demographic characteristics including age, gender, self-reported race and ethnicity, education, and employer type. We examined the relationship between passing the examination and attendance at an accredited paramedic training program. RESULTS: A total of 12,773 students completed the examination. Students who attended an accredited program were more likely to pass the examination (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.51-1.81). Attendance at an accredited training program was independently associated with passing the examination (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.43-1.74) even after accounting for confounding demographic factors. CONCLUSION: Students who attended an accredited paramedic program were more likely to achieve a passing score on a national paramedic credentialing examination. Additional studies are needed to identify the aspects of program accreditation that lead to improved examination success.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2003

Results of the first 100 accreditation procedures in France.

PURPOSE: To identify the areas of needed improvement that were most frequently identified in the first 100 accredited hospitals by the French Accreditation College (FAC) according to the standards manual. To compare the outcomes of accreditation procedures according to the status and size of the accredited hospitals. DATA SOURCES: We analyzed the first 100 summaries of accreditation reports available on the website of the Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES). DATA EXTRACTION: Data were collected on hospitals, accreditation processes, and outcomes (decisions of the FAC). For each decision, we assessed the relationship with accreditation manual criteria, and analyzed their distribution by chapter. RESULTS: of data synthesis. Among the 100 accredited hospitals (40 public, 43 private, 17 mixed), nine were accredited without recommendations for improvement, 47 with recommendations, 40 with reservations, and four with major reservations. All of them received requests for improvement. No significant difference was found concerning the FAC decisions according to status and size of hospitals, although there was a trend that the larger the hospital, the more numerous and more serious the decisions of the FAC. The main topics addressed by decisions were those given high priority by the FAC (information given to patients and its traceability on patient records, and signing of prescriptions for medication). CONCLUSION: Despite wide heterogeneity in the summaries on accreditation and in FAC decision-making, this study provides an initial insight into common quality defects and ANAES priorities for hospitals in France.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2005

Paradoxes of French accreditation.

The accreditation system introduced into the French healthcare system in 1996 has five particular characteristics: (1) it is mandatory for all healthcare establishments; (2) it is performed by an independent government agency; (3) surveyors have to report all instances of non-compliance with safety regulations; (4) the accreditation report is delivered to regional administrative authorities and a summary is made available to the public; and (5) regional administrative authorities can use the information contained in the accreditation report to revise hospital budgets. These give rise to a number of paradoxes: (1) the fact that accreditation is mandatory lends itself to ambiguity and likens the process to an inspection; (2) the fact that decision makers can use the information contained in the accreditation report for resource allocation can incite establishments to adopt strategic behaviours aimed merely at complying with the accreditation manual; and (3) there is a tendency for establishments to reduce quality processes to nothing more than the completion of accreditation and to focus efforts on standardizing practices and resolving safety issues to the detriment of organizational development. All accreditation systems must be aware of these paradoxes and decide on the level of government involvement and the relationship between accreditation and resource allocation. With time, accreditation in France could benefit from both a professionally driven system and from the increased amount of freedom to focus on quality improvement which is necessary for organizational development.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accreditation of diagnostic imaging services in developing countries.

In recent decades, medical imaging has experienced a technological revolution. After conducting several surveys to assess the quality and safety of diagnostic imaging services in Latin America and the Caribbean, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed a basic accreditation program that can be implemented by the ministry of health of any developing country. Patterned after the American College of Radiology's accreditation program, the PAHO program relies on a national accreditation committee to establish and maintain accreditation standards. The process involves a peer review evaluation of: (1) imaging and processing equipment, (2) physician and technologist staff qualifications, (3) quality control and quality assurance programs, and (4) image quality and, where applicable, radiation dose. Public and private conventional radiography/fluoroscopy, mammography, and ultrasound services may request accreditation. The radiography/fluoroscopy accreditation program has three modules from which to choose: chest radiography, general radiography, and fluoroscopy. The national accreditation committee verifies compliance with the standards. On behalf of the ministry of health, the accreditation committee also issues a three-year accreditation certificate. As needed, the accreditation committee consults with foreign technical and clinical experts.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2002

[Accreditation of hospitals. A review of international experiences].

Internationally, there is solid experience on accreditation. Accreditation in the present paper is described in the form that is used in the three biggest and oldest organisations, The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO), The Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation (CCHSA), and The Australian Council on Healthcare (ACHS). Common elements in the organisations are standards, indicators, surveyors, surveys, accreditation report, and end result. The development in the three organisations has been different. However, the establishment of The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) and The Agenda for Leadership in Programs in Healthcare Accreditation (ALPHA) programme has motivated increasing comparability. The fact that association between accreditation and quality in patient care has not been demonstrated is a weak point. However, standards in the accreditation organisations require the use of clinical guidelines in order to increase the quality of patient care. From the "Health Policy Report 2002" it appears that external assessment in the form of accreditation is going to be a reality in the Danish healthcare sector. Hospitals of all counties and within The Copenhagen Hospital Corporation must undergo accreditation before the year 2006.

Accreditation↗