Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Interventions with a significant mortality difference in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and comparison with Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a high mortality rate. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines are the worldwide reference for clinicians in management of ARDS. Mortality represents one of the most important outcomes in intensive care practice and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) the highest level of evidence. We compared Guidelines recommendations with RCT results to highlight differences and find potential new therapeutic opportunities. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all RCTs reporting a statistically significant mortality difference in ARDS and a subsequent comparison with ESICM and ATS Guidelines recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 33 RCTs and 23 interventions with mortality difference in ARDS patients. Seven interventions relate to invasive ventilation strategies, two to noninvasive ventilation strategies, one to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), 12 to drugs and one to nutritional support. In 25/33 (76%) RCTs the intervention was associated with mortality reduction and in 8/33 with mortality increase (24%). Multicenter studies were 24/33 (73%) while blinding was adopted in 19/33 (58%) studies. Guidelines recommendations supported by RCTs with mortality impact include: the use of low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, venovenous ECMO, steroids and the avoidance of high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Eight of the interventions identified were not mentioned by Guidelines but demonstrated reduced mortality, and five further interventions demonstrated increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights potential gaps between RCTs results and Guidelines that could be used to plan future research or highlight topics to be discussed in future Guidelines.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Meta-analysis of prostacyclin therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostacyclin in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in four main databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The protocol was registered in advance in the International Prospective of Systematic Reviews (CRD420261325458). RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included involving a total of 7009 infants in this systematic review and meta-analysis. GRADE assessment revealed substantial heterogeneity in the quality of evidence across outcomes, with most outcomes rated very low quality and only one rated moderate quality. Studies were performed meta-analysis, which showed the use of prostacylin resulted a statistically significant decrease in the OI compared to the control group (Mean Difference (MD), 9.34; I2 0%; p < 0.00001), no statistically significant in mortality (OR, 0.83; I2 84%; p = 0.70), ECMO (OR = 4.9; I2 98%; p = 0.27), BNP (std MD, 6.98; I2 98%; p = 0.31), FiO2 (SMD = 8.0;, I2 64%; p = 0.11), Systolic orientation of IVS curvature (SMD = 0.69; I2 97%; p = 0.32), Diastolic orientation of IVS differences (MD = 0.62; I2 93% p = 0.26). After applying the Hartung-Knapp adjustment, with the exception of BNP, the pooled effects of the other outcomes were not statistically significant, and there was high heterogeneity in measures such as ECMO and ventricular septal curvature. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this meta-analysis has confirmed that prostacyclin may temporarily improve oxygenation. However, after applying the Hartung-Knapp adjustment, with the exception of BNP, the pooled effects of the other outcomes were not statistically significant, and there was high heterogeneity in measures such as ECMO and ventricular septal curvature. Further validation through high-quality studies are still needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD420261325458.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Initial 4-Year Experience With Microaxial Flow Pumps Within a Tertiary Centre in Regional Australia.

BACKGROUND & AIM: The Microaxial Flow Pump (MFP) is a miniaturised rotary pump that aspirates blood from the left ventricle and expels it into the ascending aorta. It unloads the left ventricle and increases mean arterial pressure and cardiac output. MFP is most commonly utilised in cardiogenic shock, for protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and for ventricular offloading in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MFP insertion at John Hunter Hospital, Australia. Categorical data are represented as counts and percentages, with continuous variables described as means with standard deviations. RESULTS: Twenty-three MFP devices were inserted between September 2020 and May 2024. Five (22%) were for protected PCI, three (13%) for venting with VA-ECMO (ECPELLA), and 15 (65%) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and cardiogenic shock. The median age for the overall cohort was 62 years, with a 74% male predominance. Eighty percent of the protected PCI cohort were elective outpatient procedures, and there were no deaths in this cohort. The mortality in the ECPELLA group was 67%. Thirteen (87%) of the patients with cardiogenic shock presented with an anterior infarct, and 53% had cardiac arrest on admission. The overall morality in the cardiogenic shock cohort was 40%. Complications in this cohort included limb ischaemia in four patients (17%) and site bleeding in seven patients (30%). Four patients (17%) required vascular surgery intervention. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience showed the use of MFP in a tertiary centre was safe and feasible, allowing progression from protected percutaneous intervention to acute cardiogenic shock.

Humans↗