Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Association between cumulative social disadvantage, as measured by the social determinants of health score, and epilepsy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) shape access to care, health behaviors, and long-term outcomes, yet their cumulative relationship with epilepsy has not been well quantified. This study examined whether a composite SDoH score was associated with epilepsy in adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. The SDoH score ranged from 0 to 8 and summarized eight unfavorable social conditions. Epilepsy was identified using medication-based ascertainment. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association between SDoH score and epilepsy. Restricted cubic spline, subgroup, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 13,119 participants were included, of whom 114 had epilepsy. Participants with epilepsy had a higher mean SDoH score than those without epilepsy (3.41&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;0.24 vs. 2.35&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;0.06, P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). In the fully adjusted model, each 1-point increase in SDoH score was associated with 31% higher odds of epilepsy (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48). Compared with the low-score group (0-2), the adjusted odds ratios were 2.09 (95% CI 1.06-4.15) for scores of 3-5 and 2.67 (95% CI 1.34-5.33) for scores of 6-8. Spline analysis showed a significant overall association without evidence of nonlinearity. Adding SDoH components to demographic variables improved model discrimination (AUC 0.731 vs. 0.589, P for difference <0.001). CONCLUSION: Greater cumulative social disadvantage, as reflected by the SDoH score, was associated with higher odds of epilepsy.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Sleep stage-dependent distribution of interictal epileptiform discharges in epilepsy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Sleep and epilepsy interact through complex bidirectional mechanisms. Although NREM sleep facilitates interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), the diagnostic contribution of individual sleep stages remains uncertain. In particular, it is unclear whether deeper sleep stages such as N3 provide an advantage over N2 for spike detection or localization in clinical (electroencephalography) EEG practice. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting quantitative IED measures across sleep stages in patients with epilepsy. Eligible studies included scalp EEG, video-EEG, polysomnography, or intracranial recordings. Mean IED rates per minute were derived when possible. Comparisons between NREM and REM sleep and between N2 and N3 stages were performed using study level non-parametric tests. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Ten observational studies including 266 patients (mean age 30.1&#xa0;years) were analyzed. IED rates were significantly higher during NREM than REM sleep (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, W&#xa0;=&#xa0;0, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0019, r&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.87). No significant difference was observed between N2 and N3 sleep, although median spike rates were slightly higher during N3 than N2 (0.99 vs 0.86 IED/min). REM showed the lowest activity. CONCLUSIONS: NREM sleep consistently exhibited higher IED rates than REM sleep, reinforcing the neurophysiological association between sleep stage and epileptiform activity without establishing diagnostic superiority.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Infertility treatment in women with epilepsy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The impact of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on seizure control in women with epilepsy remains incompletely understood. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2025. Eligible studies included observational studies and case-based reports involving women undergoing infertility treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1216 publications were identified, of which four studies met the inclusion criteria, including case reports, a case series, and a cohort study. These studies included 16 women aged 25-46&#xa0;years undergoing infertility treatment, all but one of whom had epilepsy. Interventions involved in vitro fertilization (IVF), ovulation induction, and hormonal therapies. Patients were treated with a range of antiseizure medications (ASMs), including carbamazepine, clobazam, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, valproate, and zonisamide, either as monotherapy or in combination. Seizure frequency was generally stable, with most patients maintaining baseline seizure control. Seizure exacerbations were uncommon and primarily associated with hormonal therapy and reduced ASM levels, particularly reduced lamotrigine levels. Reported events included breakthrough seizures in the setting of decreased lamotrigine concentrations, seizure clusters associated with follitropin beta, and a new-onset seizure following dehydroepiandrosterone exposure. Across studies, multiple ART attempts resulted in live births with different ASM regimens, as well as in patients not receiving ASMs. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that ART is feasible in women with epilepsy, with most patients maintaining stable seizure control. Hormonal therapy may affect ASM pharmacokinetics and seizure threshold, thereby warranting close monitoring. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define ASM-specific effects and optimize care.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of music interventions on seizure outcomes in people with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta&#x2011;analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of music interventions on seizure outcomes in people with epilepsy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta&#x2011;analysis of controlled and single&#x2011;arm studies. Searches were conducted in four English databases, two trial registries, and three Chinese databases, up to October 11, 2025. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences or standardized mean differences (SMD, Hedges' g) using random&#x2011;effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q and I2. Preplanned subgroup and leave&#x2011;one&#x2011;out sensitivity analyses examined control type and study influence. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were appraised. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Single&#x2011;arm syntheses suggested benefit: pooled curative&#x2011;effect rate 0.715 (95&#xa0;% CI 0.584-0.846) and pre-post IED reduction -0.51 (95&#xa0;% CI -0.88 to -0.13). Controlled between&#x2011;group estimates were imprecise and heterogeneous. Pooled OR for seizure response was 2.71 (95&#xa0;% CI 0.61-12.12, I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;81.2&#xa0;%, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.19). IED responder OR was 4.57 (95&#xa0;% CI 0.84-24.86, I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;68.9&#xa0;%). IED frequency SMD was -1.48 (95&#xa0;% CI -3.06 to 0.10, I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;95.2&#xa0;%). Seizure&#x2011;frequency SMD across controlled studies was -0.004 (95&#xa0;% CI -1.772 to 1.763, I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;95.6&#xa0;%). Results were sensitive to individual studies and limited by small samples and variable comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Music interventions show promising within&#x2011;study effects on seizure outcomes, but controlled evidence is inconclusive due to high heterogeneity and imprecision. High&#x2011;quality, adequately powered randomized trials with standardized interventions and matched active controls are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The psychosocial supports and interventions accessed by family members of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: A systematic review.

AIM: Family members of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) face profound emotional, social and practical challenges, yet little is known about how they access psychosocial support. We synthesised the literature on the psychosocial support accessed by family members of patients with DEEs, including evidence-based interventions. METHOD: Four databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, appraised study quality (QualSyst Tool), and determined certainty of evidence (GRADE-CERQual Framework). Data were synthesised using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: 28 papers comprising 27 unique studies were included and methodological quality was high overall (median&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.91, IQR&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.85-1.00). Most studies focused on parent experiences; only two included siblings' perspectives. Families reported high psychological needs which were rarely met by psychological support. Clinicians rarely provided adequate information, quality communication or addressed mental health. Families valued respite care, but experienced barriers to access. Peer support was the most common and valued resource. Three studies tested interventions and appeared feasible and acceptable for parents. However, evidence for intervention effectiveness is preliminary and limited to small, uncontrolled pilot studies. INTERPRETATION: Gaps exist in psychosocial support provision for families of patients with DEEs, including insufficient research on siblings' and grandparents' needs, and lack of evidence-based interventions. We propose evidence-informed research and implementation strategies to address these gaps.

Humans↗