Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification and characterization of G protein-coupled receptors in the nocturnal halictid bee Megalopta genalis.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest families of membrane proteins in insects, regulating vision, neural signal transduction, and various physiological behaviors. Megalopta genalis exhibits a unique facultatively eusocial lifestyle and possesses adaptations for nocturnal activity; however, its GPCR family has not yet been systematically characterized. In this study, we performed genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of GPCRs in M. genalis by integrating genomic annotation and transcriptomic analysis. The results showed that a total of 99 GPCRs were identified in the genome of M. genalis, which were classified into four major families. Here, we show that M. genalis has undergone lineage-specific GPCR repertoire remodeling, marked by the expansion of novel orphan receptors and the systematic loss of multiple receptor subtypes, such as the neuropeptide receptors MIP-R and NPFR. Moreover, opsins have formed a diverse array of combinations and non-GPCR odorant receptors have undergone significant expansion via tandem duplication. Together, these features may represent part of the molecular repertoire associated with the adaptation of M. genalis to a nocturnal lifestyle. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct spatiotemporal expression divergence within each of the Mth/Mthl and Fz GPCR families, suggesting functional specialization across development and adult tissues. This study provides the first systematic identification and initial functional characterization of GPCRs in M. genalis, revealing an evolutionary pattern characterized by the coexistence of contraction and expansion within the GPCR family. These findings lay a foundation for further studies aimed at elucidating the roles of these GPCRs in regulating M. genalis physiology and behavior.

Animals

Uce-based phylogeny and classification of Megachilini.

The generic-level classification of the bee tribe Megachilini (Megachilidae) has remained controversial due to poor phylogenetic resolution at the base of the group, particularly among the brood parasitic genera and the numerous dauber ("Chalicodoma s. l.") lineages. We present a phylogenomic analysis of Megachilini based on ultraconserved elements (UCEs), sampling 52 ingroup taxa with emphasis on the dauber lineages. We also present a combined UCE + six-gene analysis to improve taxon coverage, resulting in a dataset with 127 ingroup taxa. Maximum likelihood, coalescent, and Bayesian analyses of multiple UCE matrices recover largely congruent topologies with substantially improved support relative to previous studies. Our results strongly support the monophyly of Megachilini, the early divergence of Noteriades and Gronoceras, and a single origin of brood parasitism. All remaining non-parasitic Megachilini form a moderately supported clade sister to the brood parasitic lineage. The leafcutter bees are monophyletic and nested within dauber lineages. Several major dauber clades are consistently recovered, including an exclusively Australian clade corresponding to the Hackeriapis group of subgenera, while several recognized subgenera are paraphyletic. The lineage known as Morphella, previously placed in synonymy with the subgenus Callomegachile, was not closely related to that subgenus and is here treated as a valid subgenus. Divergence-time analyses place the crown age of Megachilini in the late Eocene to early Oligocene, with major extant lineages diversifying during the Miocene. Limited morphological diagnosability of several clades indicates that splitting non-parasitic lineages into numerous genera would result in an impractical classification that would widen the gap between taxonomists and non-specialists and exacerbate the taxonomic impediment in bees. We therefore advocate retaining a single genus Megachile for non-parasitic Megachilini (excluding Noteriades and Gronoceras), as the classification best supported by phylogenomic evidence and most robust to future taxon sampling.

Animals