Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9917552

[Methods for evaluating biological response modifiers].

Abstract

Biological response modifiers (BRM) are a new approach of cancer treatment. The guidelines for their evaluation are comparable to those used for evaluating conventional anticancer treatments. However, it is more difficult to assess their efficacy and toxicity because of their own properties and of the characteristics of underlying diseases. The objectives of studying BRM efficacy are the following : 1- to confirm the pharmacodynamic effect observed in experimental models; 2- to assess the benefit for the patient. Phase II studies can occasionally be performed in healthy volunteers. Efficacy criteria are objective response rate, progression free survival, overall survival or, for hematopoietic growth factors, more specific criteria. In randomized phase III studies patients in the control arm can be observed without treatment, or receive a placebo or a standard treatment. As regards toxicity, side effects specifically related to the use of BRM are the synthesis of cytokines, the stimulation of immune system, the stimulation of tumor growth, the synthesis of anti-mouse of anti-BRM antibodies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Harousseau. 1998. [Methods for evaluating biological response modifiers].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9917552/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medicinal herbs: drugs or dietary supplements?

The process of evaluating medicinal herbs is complex, and there is a need to carefully define a research strategy that addresses a solution to safe and efficacious herbal products. Notwithstanding the immense value of distilling the pharmacological activity of an herb into a chemical suitable for drug development, another approach is to develop a standardized herbal extract that yields consistent pharmacological activity. However, it frequently is forgotten that even in an extract several active ingredients contribute to the pharmacological action. Sufficient evidence exists to suggest that extracts of medicinal herbs, once isolated in their pure state, can produce pharmacological effects that differ significantly from that of the whole herb. This article discusses a research-based strategy that may be suitable for validating, in part, the putative health benefits of medicinal herbs. Additionally, the body of scientific evidence that underpins the pharmacological activity of several herbs is reviewed briefly.

Clinical Trials as Topic