Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9845582

Update: total versus partial laparoscopic fundoplication.

Abstract

Since the introduction of Nissen fundoplicaton in 1956, there has been concern about the incidence of troublesome mechanical complications, which has necessitated several modifications reducing the overall incidence to around 15%. Increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of Nissen fundoplication has revealed that these complications are associated with a supracompetent high pressure zone (HPZ) which relaxes incompletely on swallowing and is associated with abolition of gas reflux and physiological acid reflux. Partial fundoplication procedures, which augment various constituents of the valvuloplasty component of competence and utilise a lesser degree of fundoplication, are associated with a very low incidence of mechanical complications, but debate has ensued that reflux control may be suboptimal and less durable than after Nissen fundoplication. However, several good, objective comparative studies and three prospective randomised trials have confirmed that a well conducted partial fundoplication procedure is at least as effective and durable in reflux control as Nissen fundoplication, whilst being associated with a lower incidence of mechanical complications. The debate has intensified since the advent of laparoscopic fundoplication, as several reports have highlighted the increased incidence of mechanical complications following Nissen fundoplication when performed laparoscopically compared with the open approach, with a higher incidence of impaired HPZ relaxation, believed to be associated with altered geometry and other factors inherent in laparoscopic fundoplication. This has resulted in re-operation rates for complications of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication of 1-7%, and in the laparoscopic era, mechanical complications have overtaken recurrent reflux as the principal reason for revisional fundoplication. Several non-randomised series have shown that laparoscopic partial fundoplication procedures are associated with a similarly low incidence of mechanical complications and a negligible re-operation rate as at open operation, with retention of physiologial HPZ relaxation. These factors have resulted in increasing deployment of partial fundoplication procedures, and increasing support for the 'tailored' approach to anti-reflux surgery. Several prospective randomised studies between laparoscopic partial and total fundoplication procedures are currently in progress, and early results favour partial fundoplication because of the considerably lower incidence of mechanical complications. The continuance of these studies, as well as those underway which compare different partial fundoplication procedures and include economic and quality-of-life assessment, should enable the rational choice of the most appropriate laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure to be placed on a firm scientific footing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Watson. 1998. Update: total versus partial laparoscopic fundoplication.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature.

BACKGROUND: Little grade A medical evidence exists to support the use of prosthetic material for hiatal closure. Therefore, the authors compiled and analyzed all the available literature to determine whether the use of prosthetic mesh in hiatoplasty for routine laparoscopic fundoplications (LF) or for the repair of large (>5 cm) paraesophageal hernias (PEH) would decrease recurrence. METHODS: A literature search was performed using an inclusive list of relevant search terms via Medline/PubMed to identify papers (n = 19) describing the use of prosthetic material to repair the crura of patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH reduction, LF, or both. RESULTS: Case series (n = 5), retrospective reviews (n = 6), and prospective randomized (n = 4) and nonrandomized (n = 4) trials were identified. Laparoscopic procedures (n = 1,368) were performed for PEH, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatal hernia, or a combination of the three. Group A (n = 729) had primary suture repair of the crura, and group B (n = 639) had repair with either interposition of mesh to close the hiatus or onlay of prosthetic material after hiatal or crural closure. The use of mesh was associated with fewer recurrences than primary suture repair in both the LF and PEH groups. The mean follow-up period did not differ between the groups (20.7 months for group A vs. 19.2 months for group B). None of the papers cited any instance of prosthetic erosion into the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSIONS: The current data tend to support the use of prosthetic materials for hiatal repair in both routine LF and the repair of large PEHs. Longer and more stringent follow-up evaluation is necessary to delineate better the safety profile of mesh hiatoplasty. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm that mesh repair is superior to simple crural closure.

Fundoplication↗