Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9832897

The autonomy paradox: predictive genetic testing and autonomy: three essential problems.

Abstract

The development of genetics creates the possibility to acquire more and more information concerning our genetic constitution. In general this is considered as a contribution to the autonomy of patients and others. In this article it is pointed out that the relation between genetic information and autonomy is far from simple. The autonomy of people may even be threatened by genetic information. Counsellors should therefore be very careful in offering the opportunity of genetic testing; a general policy of restraint would be advisable. And when offering information, several considerations should be kept in mind in order to avoid doing more harm than good in the counseling process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A K Huibers, A van 't Spijker. 1998. The autonomy paradox: predictive genetic testing and autonomy: three essential problems.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00083-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗