Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9773874

Quantitative flow cytometry: inter-laboratory variation.

Abstract

Quantitative flow cytometry (QFCM) offers a means of standardization within and between flow cytometers. QFCM parameters were set by determining the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) of CD4, CD8, and CD3 cells from 10 normal donors with the use of eight FACScan flow cytometers. QC3 beads and a certified blank bead were used to set up the instruments. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated to molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome (MESF) microbead standards was used before and after the donor samples were run to ensure that the machines were operating consistently. Lyophilized cells (Cytotrol) were used as a target, to control for antigen expression in the cell preparation. Quantitative Simply Cellular (QSC) beads were used to establish a standard calibration curve for each of the FITC and phycoerythrin antibody conjugates on each of the instruments. Single-parameter fluorescent histograms derived from list-mode files were used to calculate the slope (coefficient of response), intercept (zero channel), number of channels per decade, and ABC or MESF threshold (blank bead). The fluorescence intensity (geometric mean) of the positive and negative donor cell populations was compared with the standard curves, and the ABCs were calculated. The results show consistent instrument performance between laboratories. However, after standardization of CD3, CD4, and CD8 ABCs to microbeads, large variations were noted between donors and laboratories. The source of this variation does not appear to be in the instrumentation but may be due to the lack of an unified set-up protocol, introducing issues of antibody saturation, methods for whole blood lysis and fixation, and the behavior of the microbead standards.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V E Zenger, R Vogt, F Mandy, A Schwartz, G E Marti. 1998-10-01. Quantitative flow cytometry: inter-laboratory variation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981001)33%3A2%3C138%3A%3Aaid-cyto8%3E3.0.co%3B2-f

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Real-time quantitation of HIV-1 p24 and SIV p27 using fluorescence-linked antigen quantification assays.

We developed fluorescence-linked antigen quantification (FLAQ) assays for HIV-1 and SIV antigen quantitation. The assays utilize polystyrene microspheres coated with monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 Gag p24 or SIV Gag p27, which are incubated with unknown samples, flourochrome-conjugated detector antibody, and lysing agent. The fluorescence of individual microspheres is measured using flow cytometry. The speed, simplicity, and wide dynamic range of FIAQ assays makes them superior to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for many applications performed in research laboratories.

Flow Cytometry↗

Intravenous immunoglobulin-induced panel reactive antibody A reduction: not all preparations are created equal.

BACKGROUND: Use of intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin (Ig) to obtain panel reactive antibody (PRA) A reduction in sensitized patients has been widely reported. Because no IVIg preparation is formulated specifically for this purpose, the authors have sought to determine whether, through laboratory testing, they could guide the rational choice of product for clinical use. METHODS: Using a flow cytometric approach, the authors have quantitatively determined the capacity of 22 different IVIg preparations to cause PRA reduction. RESULTS: IVIg preparations showed considerable variability in their individual capacity to reduce serum PRA. Protein-A pretreatment of IVIg preparations was found to reduce their capacity to cause PRA reduction. CONCLUSION: Laboratory screening of IVIg preparations provides a rational basis for the selection of product for administration to patients in whom the aim is to produce a PRA reduction. Experiments involving protein-A treatment of IVIg preparations indicate that immunoglobulin G is the principal factor involved in the abrogation of serum reactivity.

Flow Cytometry↗