Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9760025

Cannabinoids decrease acetylcholine release in the medial-prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, reversal by SR 141716A.

Abstract

The effect of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive principle of marijuana, and [R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[[4-morpholinylmethyl]pyrol[1,2,3-d e-]-1,4-benzoxazin-6y)(1-naphthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate] (WIN 55,212-2), a synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist, on the acetylcholine output in the medial-prefrontal cortex and hippocampus was studied by microdialysis in freely moving rats. The administration of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (1 and 5 mg/kg i.p.) and WIN 55,212-2 (5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) produced a long lasting inhibition of acetylcholine release in both areas. The inhibitory effect of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and WIN 55,212-2 was suppressed in both areas by the specific cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-me thyl-1H-pyrazole-3carboxamide]HCl (SR 141716A), at the dose of 0.1 mg/kg i.p., per se ineffective to modify basal acetylcholine release. Most interestingly, SR 141716A alone at higher doses increased acetylcholine release both in the medial-prefrontal cortex (3 mg/kg i.p.) and hippocampus (1 and 3 mg/kg i.p.), suggesting that acetylcholine output is tonically inhibited by endogenous cannabinoids. Since the inhibitory effect of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol is produced by doses within those relevant to human use of marijuana, our results suggest that the negative effects of the latter on cognitive processes may be explained by its ability to reduce acetylcholine release in the medial-prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Conversely, cannabinoid receptor antagonists may offer potential treatments for cognitive deficits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G L Gessa, M A Casu, G Carta, M S Mascia. 1998-08-21. Cannabinoids decrease acetylcholine release in the medial-prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, reversal by SR 141716A.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00486-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Menadione-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction and its possible significance.

Although several studies have shown that treatment with menadione leads to endothelial cell cytotoxicity, investigations of menadione's effects on blood vessels are limited. Our previous studies have shown that menadione can indirectly induce alterations in vasomotor tone through platelet cytotoxicity. To determine if menadione affects vascular function, we investigated the effect of menadione on blood vessels using the isolated rat aortic rings in vitro organ bath system. Treatment with menadione directly resulted in contraction of aortic rings with endothelium but did not cause any effect on aortic rings without endothelium. Menadione irreversibly inhibited the acetylcholine- and histamine-induced relaxation of aortic rings with endothelium in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Menadione treatment potentiated phenylephrine- and serotonin-induced vasoconstriction in aortic rings with endothelium. These in vitro results were observed at concentrations of menadione that are highly relevant to human therapeutics with menadione. When menadione was administrated intravenously to rats, blood pressure increased significantly in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, menadione infusion suppressed the blood pressure reduction induced by acetylcholine. By demonstrating that menadione caused in vitro endothelial dysfunction (i.e., decreased relaxation and increased vasoconstriction in the organ bath experiments) and confirming that these results were consistent with in vivo observations, we have provided evidence suggesting that a quinone such as menadione can alter vasomotor tone through endothelial dysfunction. Such dysfunction could possibly contribute to vascular diseases.

Acetylcholine

Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity in follicle-enclosed Xenopus oocytes.

1. Ionic current responses elicited by acetylcholine (ACh) in follicle-enclosed Xenopus oocytes (follicles) were studied using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. ACh generated a fast chloride current (Fin) and inhibited K+ currents gated by cAMP (IK,cAMP) following receptor activation by adenosine, follicle-stimulating hormone or noradrenaline. These previously described cholinergic responses were confirmed to be of the muscarinic type, and were independently generated among follicles from different frogs. 2. Inhibition of IK,cAMP was about 100 times more sensitive to ACh than Fin activation; the half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) were 6.6 +/- 0.4 and 784 +/- 4 nM, respectively. 3. Both responses were blocked by several muscarinic receptor antagonists. Using the respective EC50 concentrations of ACh as standard, the antagonist 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide blocked the two effects with very different potencies. Fin was blocked with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 2.4 +/- 0.07 nM, whilst the IC50 for IK,cAMP inhibition was 5.9 +/- 0.2 microM. 4. Oxotremorine, a muscarinic agonist, preferentially stimulated IK, cAMP inhibition (EC50 = 15.8 +/- 1.4 microM), whilst Fin was only weakly activated. In contrast, oxotremorine inhibited Fin generated by ACh with an IC50 of 2.3 +/- 0.7 microM. 5. Fin elicited via purinergic receptor stimulation was not affected by oxotremorine, indicating that the inhibition produced was specific to the muscarinic receptor, and suggesting that muscarinic actions do not exert a strong effect on follicular cell-oocyte coupling. 6. Using reverse transcription-PCR, transcripts of a previously cloned muscarinic receptor from Xenopus (XlmR) were amplified from the RNA of both the isolated follicular cells and the oocyte. The pharmacological and molecular characteristics suggest that XlmR is involved in IK,cAMP inhibition. 7. In conclusion, follicular cells possess two different muscarinic receptors, one resembling the M2 (or M4) subtype and the other the M3 subtype. These receptors are coupled to distinct membrane mechanisms leading to independent regulation of two membrane conductances.

Acetylcholine

Regulation of the subcellular distribution of m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in striatal neurons in vivo by the cholinergic environment: evidence for regulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous and exogenous stimulation.

Our aim was to determine how the cholinergic environment influences, in vivo, the membrane abundance and the intracellular trafficking of the muscarinic receptor m4 (m4R). Immunohistochemistry at light and electron microscopic level was used to detect the subcellular localization of m4R in several populations of striatal cholinoceptive neurons, including cholinergic neurons and medium spiny neurons. (1) In control rats, in cholinergic neurons, m4R is mostly restricted to intracytoplasmic sites involved in its synthesis, especially endoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, m4R is preferentially located at the plasma membrane in cell bodies and dendritic shafts and spines of medium spiny neurons. The density of m4R was greater at the membrane of perikarya in patches (striatal areas with low acetylcholine activity) than in matrix (striatal areas with high acetylcholine activity). (2) Stimulation of muscarinic receptor with oxotremorine provokes translocation of m4R from the membrane to endosomes in perikarya and dendrites of medium spiny neurons but has no influence on the localization of m4R in the cytoplasm of cholinergic cell bodies. Our results suggest that the intraneuronal trafficking and the abundance of membrane-bound m4R in vivo is under regulation of the cholinergic environment. The m4R subcellular compartmentalization depends on the phenotype of the cholinoceptive neuron and on its neurochemical environment. Such regulation, by modulating availability of receptor for endogenous and exogenous ligands, may play key roles in the response of target neurons.

Acetylcholine