PubMed · 9752148
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Young, E Sutton. Aiming high.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.12.47.16.s34
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To show the opinions that doctors and nurses express on the organisation and competences of primary care nursing, and on inter-professional relations. DESIGN: Qualitative research study based on the group discussion technique known as Philips 66. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three discussion groups, one of nurses, one of doctors and a third mixed, with 6 components each, half from Cáceres and the rest from other provinces, and all involved in primary care health delivery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the discussions, the three groups coincided in the importance given to nursing clinics and home visits, in the organisational advantages that the attachment as a norm of the population to a nursing clinic would bring, in the ability of nurses to perform the techniques they have habitually used, and in defence of one sole clinical record per patient. They blamed each other mutually for making few home visits. Doctors attributed to nurses under-use of records and nurses alleged doctors took no notice of their notes. On the question of their relations, doctors thought that nurses did not take on joint responsibility for the work-loads in health centres; and nurses thought that doctors did not wish to share tasks, but rather delegate or order them. CONCLUSIONS: The attachment of the population to nursing clinics would favour the extension of care, the commitment to the population and the real delivery of services, as well as professional autonomy and recognition.
The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-36) and the Quality of Life Profile: Senior Version (QOLPSV) for measuring outcomes of home care nursing were evaluated. Data were collected from 50 clients receiving home care nursing services. Twenty-two registered nurses and six registered practical nurses collected client and nursing data on each home visit. Client baseline and outcome measures were collected by two independent evaluators at admission and discharge from the home care service. Internal consistency reliability ranged from.76 to.94 for the eight subscales of the SF-36. Internal consistency reliability ranged from.47 to.82 for the nine subscales of the QOLPSV. The subscales of both instruments had minimal problems with missing responses. The SF-36 was found to be more sensitive than the QOLPSV to change over time. In addition, the subscales of the SF-36 were found to be more sensitive than the subscales of the QOLPSV to several of the nursing variables, such as intensity of the client's nursing condition and skill mix.