Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9741776

Evaluation and prognostication in coma.

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potential (EP) studies are neurophysiologic techniques which provide information on physiological state and response to therapy, and may aid diagnosis and prognosis. Serial studies or continuous monitoring may enable changes to be detected prior to irreversible deterioration in the patient's condition. Current computer technology allows simultaneous display and correlation of electrophysiologic parameters, cardiovascular state and ICP. Continuous EEG monitoring in the ICU has been shown to have a decisive or contributing impact on medical decision making in more than three-quarters of patients. In addition, continuous EEG monitoring has revealed previously unsuspected non-convulsive seizures in two-thirds of patients. Somatosensory and auditory EPs can provide useful prognostic information in coma patients, however, these tests are etiologically non-specific and must be carefully integrated into the clinical situation. Motor EPs offer a potentially useful tool for evaluating motor system abnormalities in the ICU. Thus, neurophysiologic tests are established monitoring tools in the neurological intensive care unit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K H Chiappa, R A Hill. 1998. Evaluation and prognostication in coma.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00118-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the predictive power (odd ratio, OR) for awakening of auditory event-related potential (ERP) components in low responsive patients with stroke or hemorrhage, trauma, anoxic, post-operative, and metabolic encephalopathy etiologies. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE and analyzed citations for retrieved articles. Logistic regressions were applied on patient samples (Glasgow Coma Scale <12) across and for separate etiologies. RESULTS: For stroke and hemorrhage the ORs with 95% confidence intervals were: 2.05 [1.12-3.75] (N100), 4.47 [1.92-10.44] (MMN), 10.29 [2.00-52.79] (P300), for trauma: 1.63 [0.70-3.80] (N100), 4.72 [1.35-16.44] (MMN), 12.89 [4.82-34.43] (P300), anoxic: 8.03 [2.83-22.75] (N100), 15.50 [4.27-56.26] (MMN), 5.93 [2.38-14.77] (P300), post-operative: 10.66 [1.98-57.50] (N100), metabolic encephalopathy: 2.12 [0.34-13.13] (N100), 3.60 [0.28-46.36] (MMN), 7.71 [0.75-79.77] (P300), and all etiologies: 2.85 [1.91-4.27] (N100), 6.53 [3.55-12.01] (MMN), and 8.79 [4.88-15.83] (P300). Based on six N100 studies (N=548 patients), five MMN studies (N=470), and six P300 studies (N=313), the N100, MMN, or P300, when present, significantly predicted awakening, P300 and MMN being significantly better predictors than N100. CONCLUSIONS: The MMN and P300 appear to be reliable predictors of awakening. SIGNIFICANCE: The prognostic assessment of low responsive patients with auditory ERP should take into account both MMN and P300.

Coma↗