Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9735430

DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing.

Abstract

Digital modalities such as CT, MRI, Ultrasound and Computerized Radiography systems, generating softcopy images to be used by a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), need to identify the images properly in order to retrieve and manage them. In many cases, a technologist re-enters patient demographic and study related information at the modality, even although it is usually already present somewhere in the hospital information system (IS). In order to achieve a higher level of efficiency and uniquely identify the created image objects, it is obvious that an interface between the IS and modality to exchange this information is highly desired. There are two options for a modality vendor to implement an IS interface, either using the Health Level (HL7) or Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM) communication standard. This paper will explain characteristics of both protocols, and demonstrate that it is preferred to use DICOM versus HL7. In addition, it will show that DICOM is supported by most modality vendors, based on the result of a poll of their Modality Worklist versus HL7 support.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Oosterwijk. 1998. DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03168256

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Physics and instrumentation for imaging in-vivo drug distribution.

Several imaging methods are currently available to measure drugs noninvasively. Of these, two techniques are today central to such measurements: nuclear imaging and magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy (MRI and MRS). While other methods, such as optical techniques, are rapidly gaining in interest, they have not yet attained the degree of development that makes them effective in measuring drugs in living systems, except in a small number of examples. The following introduction provides some basic elements of the potential and the limitations of both nuclear imaging and MRI/MRS techniques, methods that will be used in the studies described in the articles in this issue. However, and for those desiring to gain a better understanding of both methods, the reader is advised to consult much more extensive reviews and books describing such methods. A suggested list of books and articles on Nuclear Imaging and MRI/MRS is given.

Diagnostic Imaging↗