Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9731370

Modular data acquisition system updated using LabWindows/CVI Graphical User Interface.

J A Wheeldon·F A Pintar·N Yoganandan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Biomechanics Laboratory of the Neuroscience Department of the Medical College of Wisconsin is currently engaged in research involving trauma biomechanics. For some experiments, 24 channels of analog data must be sampled at 10,000 Hertz. The Modular Data Acquisition System (MDAS) is able to acquire up to 60 channels of analog data at sampling intervals as low as 6 microseconds. This excellent hardware system has only menu-driven utility software that is no longer supported and required updating to a Graphical User Interface (GUI). Using National Instruments LabWindows/CVI software a GUI was developed. The GUI consists of 9 Graphical User Interface panels controlled by a 3000 line C program "MDAS3SAM". "MDAS3SAM" controls a driver program "MDAS_SAM" which communicates with the MDAS unit via a National Instruments GPIB interface. The 9 GUI panels allow the user to configure the MDAS system (selecting channels, sampling interval, triggering levels etc.), start sampling the data, writing the data to hard disk, graphing the data and printing the graphs. The new system allows the user to quickly reconfigure the MDAS unit and obtain accurate results.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaComputer SystemsData DisplaySoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceWounds and InjuriesJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Wheeldon, F A Pintar, N Yoganandan. 1997. Modular data acquisition system updated using LabWindows/CVI Graphical User Interface.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9731370/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Static and fatigue biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems. A synthetic testing model.

STUDY DESIGN: A mechanical testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems was introduced, using a synthetic model. Twelve recent instrumentation systems were tested in static and fatigue modes. OBJECTIVES: To establish the testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems using a synthetic model and to evaluate the static and fatigue biomechanical properties of 12 anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the biomechanics of anterior spinal instrumentation using a cadaveric or animal tissue, problems of specimen variation, lack of reproducibility, and inability to perform fatigue testing have been pointed out. In no studies has a precise synthetic testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems been described. METHODS: An ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene cylinder was designed according to the anatomic dimensions of the vertebral body. Two cylinders spanned by spinal instrumentation simulated a total corpectomy defect, and a compressive lateral bending load was applied. The instrumentation assembly was precisely standardized. The static destructive and fatigue tests up to 2 million cycles at three load levels were conducted, followed by the failure mode analysis. Twelve anterior instrumentation systems, consisting of five plate and seven rod systems were compared in stiffness, bending strength, and cycles to failure. RESULTS: Static and fatigue test parameters both demonstrated highly significant differences between devices. The stiffness ranged from 280.5 kN/m in the Synthes plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA) to 67.9 kN/m in the Z-plate ATL (SofamorDanek, Memphis, TN). The Synthes plate and Kaneda SR titanium (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH) formed the highest subset in bending strength of 1516.1 N and 1209.9 N, respectively, whereas the Z-plate showed the lowest value of 407.3 N. There were no substantial differences between plate and rod devices. In fatigue, only three systems: Synthes plate, Kaneda SR titanium, and Olerud plate (Nord Opedic AB, Sweden) withstood 2 million cycles at 600 N. The failure mode analysis demonstrated plate or bolt fractures in plate systems and rod fractures in rod systems. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems was successfully designed. It provided a repeatable and consistent experimental condition and controlling dimensional and surgical factors. The comparison of 12 instrumentation systems highlights the importance of mechanically balanced device design without a weak link in the development of instrumentation.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1999

Difficulties in estimating muscle forces from muscle cross-sectional area. An example using the psoas major muscle.

Most biomechanical models use muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as an indicator of maximum isometric muscle force. In general, there are multiple estimates of CSA for the same muscle. For example, numerous studies have estimated the CSA of the psoas major muscle using different subject populations and positions. However, few studies have combined the available information to obtain an overall estimate of CSA or investigated the effect different subject characteristics may have on CSA. In the present update, nine studies that reported psoas major CSA or physiologic CSA were compared with respect to subject characteristics, methodology, and results. Corrections to cadaveric data were made to adjust physiologic CSA to CSA. Comparison of reported values for living subjects indicated that females have smaller mean CSA than males for the psoas major muscle and that body size does not significantly influence muscle CSA in males. Areas derived from cadaveric data were smaller than similar studies on living subjects, possibly because of subject age, removal of tendinous and fatty components of fascicles, and lack of detailed data for fascicle angles in the supine position. Results indicate that researchers who use muscle CSA in biomechanical models should carefully assess the appropriateness of the data used, particularly in relation to potential sex differences and the influence of postural changes on CSA.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗