PubMed · 9708490
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W W Parmley. 1998. Is CPR the answer?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00277-0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Racial and ethnic disparities occur in many areas of the health care management system in the United States. These disparities include disease incidence, access to health and medical services, treatments provided, and disease outcomes. Health care delivery organizations have limited resources. Encounters between patients and providers in health care delivery organizations typically are cross-cultural. Access to care, quality of care, and equity may be affected by limited resources and cross-cultural encounters. This impacts the diagnosis, treatments provided, and outcomes, with African-American patients faring poorly compared with white patients. African Americans are 15% more likely to develop cancer than whites and are about 34% more likely to die of cancer than whites in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the characteristics of African-American patients and white patients with carcinoma of the head and neck at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, an equal-access facility, reporting similarities and disparities in disease stage at the time of diagnosis, treatment received, and patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Treatment and follow-up policy for Barrett's oesophagus are dependent on the grade of dysplasia. However, sampling error of random biopsy protocols and subjectivity of pathological grading may hamper endoscopic surveillance. METHODS: The Amsterdam Comprehensive Cancer Center Barrett Advisory Committee (BAC) is a regional multidisciplinary consultative working-group, offering revision of pathology, revision of pathology plus additional endoscopic diagnostics, or referral for treatment. RESULTS: Between July 1998 and July 1999 30 patients were referred to the B.A.C for advice; eighteen patients were referred because of suspicion of high grade dysplasia. Reassessment of biopsies, including additional quantitative pathology, with or without additional endoscopic diagnostics, led to adjustment of the grading of dysplasia in 15 patients (50%). A suspicion of low grade dysplasia was rejected in nine out of ten cases. Adjustment of the original diagnosis often influenced further therapy or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: reassessment of conventional pathology, quantitative pathology, and additional diagnostic procedures might improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging of malignant degeneration of Barrett's oesophagus, although experience is still limited. The complexity of the management of these patients demands a specialised multidisciplinary approach. A Barrett Advisory Committee can offer valuable contributions to the treatment of patients with Barrett's oesophagus.
BACKGROUND: In 1995 The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore convened an interdisciplinary task force to evaluate sedation practices, create a comprehensive set of sedation guidelines, and evaluate patient safety outcomes following guideline implementation. METHODOLOGY: Baseline data were collected on all procedures in which sedation was administered by a nonanesthesiologist for a 6-month period, using scanning technology to automate data entry. Sedation practices were reviewed, and four critical events were examined: unresponsiveness, obstructed airway, airway placement, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In 1998 data collection procedures were repeated to evaluate the impact of the guidelines on sedation practices and patient safety outcomes. RESULTS: In 1995 sedation practices varied, and one or more critical events occurred in 45 (1.4%) of 3,255 procedures. Steps taken included development and dissemination of a clinical sedation guideline, including monitoring criteria to guide nonanesthesiologists, and evaluation planning. In 1998 sedation practices were more consistent. One or more critical events occurred in 50 (1.6%) of 3,134 procedures, representing a small increase in critical events from 1995. More events of unresponsiveness were identified, and no event required CPR. Although not statistically significant, this trend suggests that critical events were being identified earlier, preventing patients from progressing to a more serious event requiring CPR. Steps taken included further refinement of clinical practice guidelines and establishment of ongoing monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of sedation practices is a complex and resource-intensive activity, requiring ongoing oversight and monitoring. Commitment from medical staff, nursing staff, and administration is essential to successful implementation of sedation guidelines.