Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9708099

Charting progress.

Abstract

Logbooks can be considered aggregate databases that registered nurses (RNs) have the primary responsibility of completing in most health care settings. However, RNs may be unaware of the many uses for the information contained in logbooks and the importance of these entries (Paine et al., 1988). Labor and delivery (L&D) logs provide an essential source of vital statistics birth data for the medical records staff. These data bits are used for reporting statistics, projecting trends, and planning future care for pregnant women.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V S Hill, L W Lowery, R A Chez. 1998. Charting progress.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6356.1998.tb01032.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perinatal outcome in pregnancies booked for antenatal care but delivered outside health facilities in Calabar, Nigeria.

Pregnancies that were booked for antenatal care but delivered outside the health facilities were studied. The aim was to determine the perinatal outcome of these pregnancies, and also to compare the outcome with that of pregnancies that were booked and delivered in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH). Birth asphyxia was the commonest perinatal morbidity in both the study (14.3%) and control (4.8%) groups and was significantly higher in the study group than in the control (P < 0.01-P < 0.05). Incidence of neonatal infection tetanus and birth trauma was also significantly higher in the study than in the control groups (P < 0.01-P < 0.05). The incidence of prematurity, neonatal jaundice and congenital abnormality did not show any significant difference in the two groups (P > 0.05). The risk of perinatal death was three times higher in the study group than in the control. Proper public enlightenment campaigns and the establishment of a national health insurance scheme which may strengthen the use of orthodox health facilities for delivery, may improve the poor perinatal outcome in our community.

Delivery Rooms↗

Home versus hospital birth.

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of observational studies have suggested that planned home birth may be safe and with less interventions than planned hospital birth. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of planned home birth compared to hospital birth on the rates of interventions, complications and morbidity as determined in randomised trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Date of last search: September 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials comparing planned hospital birth to planned home birth in selected women, assisted by an experienced home birth practitioner, and backed up by a modern hospital system in case transfer should be necessary. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by the other reviewer. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: One study involving 11 women was included. The trial was of reasonable quality, but was too small to be able to draw conclusions. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong evidence to favour either planned hospital birth or planned home birth for low risk pregnant women.

Delivery Rooms↗

Time for a new paradigm in pediatric medical education: teaching neonatal resuscitation in a simulated delivery room environment.

OBJECTIVES: Acquisition and maintenance of the skills necessary for successful resuscitation of the neonate are typically accomplished by a combination of completion of standardized training courses using textbooks, videotape, and manikins together with active participation in the resuscitation of human neonates in the real delivery room. We developed a simulation-based training program in neonatal resuscitation (NeoSim) to bridge the gap between textbook and real life and to assess trainee satisfaction with the elements of this program. METHODS: Thirty-eight subjects (physicians and nurses) participated in 1 of 9 full-day NeoSim programs combining didactic instruction with active, hands-on participation in intensive scenarios involving life-like neonatal and maternal manikins and real medical equipment. Subjects were asked to complete an extensive evaluation of all elements of the program on its conclusion. RESULTS: The subjects expressed high levels of satisfaction with nearly all aspects of this novel program. Responses to open-ended questions were especially enthusiastic in describing the realistic nature of simulation-based training. The major limitation of the program was the lack of fidelity of the neonatal manikin to a human neonate. CONCLUSION: Realistic simulation-based training in neonatal resuscitation is possible using current technology, is well received by trainees, and offers benefits not inherent in traditional paradigms of medical education.

Delivery Rooms↗