Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 965481

Phage typing set for E1, E2, E3, and E4 salmonellae.

Abstract

Eighteen common serotypes representative of group E(1), E(2), E(3), and E(4)Salmonella were characterized using a single set of phages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Gershman. 1976. Phage typing set for E1, E2, E3, and E4 salmonellae.. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.4.2.196-200.1976

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phage typing combined with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA increases discrimination in the epidemiological analysis of Salmonella enteritidis strains.

Phage typing (PT) combined with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and a random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting method was used to characterize Salmonella enteritidis strains. Twenty-four epidemiologically unrelated isolates, sampled from diverse ecological niches and fifteen isolates from four well-defined outbreaks of foodborne gastroenteritis, were studied. Seven phage types, with a predominance of PT 4 (63% of isolates), were observed when analysing the epidemiologically unrelated group. PT 4 was detected in all of the ecological niches studied, including food and fecally polluted river and beach water. The discriminatory power for phage typing, the average probability that the typing system will assign a different type to two unrelated strains randomly sampled in the microbial population, was 0.62. Ten PFGE pattern types were obtained with Xba I restriction endonuclease enzyme among the unrelated isolates; thirteen isolates belonged to PFGE pattern type 1 and the rest of the PFGE types were assigned to one or two isolates. The Dice coefficient clustered the similarities of the PFGE patterns between 80-100%. PFGE showed a discriminatory power of 0.72. Five clearly distinct RAPD patterns were observed with the OPS-19 oligonucleotide, but the discrimination obtained was low (0.46). The combination of the three typing methods increased the number of types to seventeen, giving high discrimination (0.92). Seven of the isolates recovered from various ecological niches belonged to the combination PT 4/PFGE 1/RAPD A and other combinations were unique or included only two strains. The four epidemiologically well-defined foodborne outbreaks were associated with the PT 4 phage type. In two of the outbreaks, other phage types (PT 7a and RDNC) were also observed in two isolates. Most of the isolates belonging to the foodborne outbreaks had an identical PFGE pattern (PFGE pattern type 1), but a difference in a restriction band was observed in an isolate belonging to an outbreak. Two RAPD patterns were observed in the outbreaks; RAPD pattern type A was detected in three of the four outbreaks. When the combined typing method was applied to the study, high concordance was observed and most of the outbreak strains belonged to the combination PT 4/PFGE 1/RAPD A. It is concluded that the combination of phage type with PFGE and RAPD provides a powerful discriminatory tool for the epidemiological analysis of unrelated and related strains of S. enteritidis.

Bacteriophage Typing

A new bacteriophage typing scheme for Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris strains. 3. Analysis of lytic properties.

The lytic properties of 21 bacteriophages constituting a new typing set for Proteus were examined in 507 Proteus mirabilis and 29 P. vulgaris strains isolated from patients and healthy subjects. Comparison of their morphological, serological, genetic and lytic properties showed that, in the Myoviridae and Podoviridae families, some phages were so closely related that the presence of all of them in the set was redundant. Analysis of the lytic properties revealed that some of the bacteriophages were not active enough to facilitate the differentiation of Proteus strains. The size of the final typing set was reduced from 21 to 12 phages but it was suggested that, in order to improve the differentiation capacity of the set, new phages should be included.

Bacteriophage Typing

Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage-typing in the analysis of a hospital outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis.

Isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis from 81 patients from Herlev Hospital or from Copenhagen County were analysed by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage-typing. Fourteen polymorphic markers from five decamer primers unambiguously placed all isolates into six RAPD groups: 65 isolates of phagetype 6 (PFGE type I) were resolved into three RAPD groups constituting 86, 12, and 2%, respectively. A fourth RAPD group of 10 isolates was coincident with phage type 8 (PFGE type II) and two isolates, one phage-type 1, the other phage-type 4 (both PFGE type I) formed the fifth group. The sixth group of four isolates was not phage typeable and was PFGE type III. Forty outbreak-related isolates of phage-type 6 were resolved into three strains. No diversity of phage-type 6 was found among isolates unrelated to the outbreak. It is concluded that RAPD is useful as a tool in investigations of microbial outbreaks in its own right, or to supplement phage-typing and PFGE of Salmonella Enteritidis.

Bacteriophage Typing