Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9632148

Monitoring hospital trauma mortality using statistical process control methods.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a simple and effective way to monitor trends in trauma mortality, using objective clinical categories and methods of statistical process control. STUDY DESIGN: Control charts and Pareto analysis were applied to trauma mortality data at the Maine Medical Center. We collected data prospectively on patients who died in our hospital after acute injury during 1985-1996 (and retrospectively for 1975-1984) to identify cases requiring medical quality review. We excluded from this study patients older than 80 years, those whose Glasgow Coma Scale motor component was never > 3 at any time after admission, and those with pathologic fractures, carcinomatosis, high quadriplegia, or severe burns. The remaining deaths were classified as resulting from inability to resuscitate (mostly hemorrhage), neurologic deterioration, or organ failure. The annual numbers in each of these categories were evaluated under the hypothesis of stationary Poisson processes with mean values equal to those seen from 1975-1984. RESULTS: After the exclusions, annual mortality from trauma has remained within control limits consistent with the Poisson model. Death from neurologic deterioration has shown a trend consistent with significant improvement in the process mean. Transient peaks in the other categories did not exceed control limits, but Pareto analysis prompted detailed studies of aortic and liver trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Process control methodology is easy to apply and potentially useful in monitoring hospital trauma mortality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Clark, B M Cushing, C E Bredenberg. 1998. Monitoring hospital trauma mortality using statistical process control methods.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00109-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cancer morbidity in Swedish asphalt workers.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have indicated an increased risk of lung cancer among asphalt workers. This study investigates the risk of lung cancer in Swedish asphalt workers. METHODS: A cohort of 6,150 asphalt workers, mainly employed in road construction, was compared to the general population, and to a reference group of construction workers not exposed to asphalt fumes. The exposure to polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) at paving in Sweden during the 1980s and 1990s were estimated to be in the order of one or a few micrograms per cubic meter, but must have been higher in earlier years. RESULTS: Thirty-two lung cancer cases were observed among asphalt workers. The relative risk (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals were 0.98 (0.67-1.39). The corresponding relative risk, as compared to a group of construction workers and adjusted for smoking habits, was 1.03 (0.70-1.45). We found no increased risk for other cancers investigated or death in other lung diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Asphalt workers do not have any increased lung cancer risk from exposure to fumes and gases from asphalt at the exposure levels that occurred in Sweden during the 1960s and 1970s.

Cause of Death↗

Opportunities to prevent sudden out-of-hospital death due to coronary heart disease in a community.

BACKGROUND: Intervening successfully to reduce the burden of sudden out-of-hospital death due to coronary heart disease (OHCD) requires knowledge of where these deaths occur and whether they are observed by bystanders. METHODS: To establish the proportion of OHCDs that were witnessed and where they occurred, we reviewed the coroner's notes and medical records of a previously-described sample of OHCD cases among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. This cohort (n=113) consisted of a 10% random sample of all Olmsted County residents who died out-of-hospital between 1981 and 1994 and whose deaths were attributed to coronary heart disease. RESULTS: Excluding deaths in nursing homes (n=27), 71 (83%) of the deaths occurred in private homes and 15 (17%) occurred in public places. The event was not witnessed in 59% of deaths occurring in private homes and in 20% of deaths occurring in public places. The presence or absence of a bystander could not be established for 10% of deaths in private homes and 7% of deaths in public areas. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of OHCDs occur in private homes and are not witnessed. Prevention of unwitnessed deaths will require programs that result in primary prevention and/or calls to first responders at the time of impending cardiac arrest.

Cause of Death↗