Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9624521

Teaching community-oriented primary care through longitudinal group projects.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though community-oriented primary care (COPC) has been advocated as an effective way of addressing health problems of communities, it is neither widely understood nor frequently practiced. Because COPC requires an extended period of time, as well as an approach and skills not generally learned in medical training, effectively incorporating COPC training into medical education is difficult and not frequently attempted. This paper describes a COPC curriculum for family practice residents based on required participation in a longitudinal group project. METHODS: Residents participated in successive groups that completed a COPC project over a 2-year period. Twenty-two of 26 PGY-2 residents completed an attitude and knowledge test before and after participation in the curriculum. A qualitative evaluation of the curriculum was also performed. RESULTS: Pretest and posttest responses showed significant improvement in residents' knowledge about COPC and a small but significant decline in attitudes toward COPC. Residents' reactions to the curriculum in the qualitative evaluation were both positive and negative. Residents enjoyed the group process and found it intellectually stimulating. Many reported, however, that they did not feel ownership of the project, that working through the four-step systematic COPC process was slow and cumbersome, and that they had learned only part of the COPC process. Residents consistently reported becoming more aware of the importance of discussing the focus of the project (i.e., childhood discipline or domestic violence) with their patients and feeling more comfortable initiating such discussions. CONCLUSIONS: A COPC curriculum based on required participation in a 2-year group project promoted completion of substantial projects. There were trade-offs in resident experience, including loss of continuity for individual residents. Effectively teaching COPC and engaging residents in community-oriented activities remains a challenge.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Donsky, T Villela, M Rodriguez, K Grumbach. 1998. Teaching community-oriented primary care through longitudinal group projects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9624521/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Bridging the gap: transitional rehabilitation services for people with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To review the current international rehabilitation and healthcare climate and describe a new model of service delivery aimed at enhancing the continuity of care for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHOD: An extensive literature review was undertaken and a new model of service delivery conceptualized and implemented in the Australian context of SCI rehabilitation. RESULTS: This new model of service delivery aims to improve the rehabilitation continuum for people with SCI by reducing the time spent in hospital, increasing consumer control over the rehabilitation environment and enhancing community re-integration. The new model recognizes the changing nature of the healthcare system, the legislative frameworks within which rehabilitation services are provided and the increasing role of the consumer. CONCLUSIONS: Models of rehabilitation that address the need for shorter periods of hospitalization and attempt to improve client outcomes are integral to ensure sustainable rehabilitation services in the future.

Community Health Services↗

Community rehabilitation, or rehabilitation in the community?

PURPOSE: Political and other considerations are increasing the profile of 'community rehabilitation' but there is little agreement on the nature of community rehabilitation or its benefits and disadvantages. This paper clarifies some of the underlying conceptual and evidential matters in the context of the WHO International Classification of Functioning model of disablement. CLASSIFICATIONS: Rehabilitation services can be classified by their specialist skills (e.g. spinal injury services, wheelchair services), by the geographic location of the service (e.g. inpatient stroke service), by the organization managing the service (e.g. social services rehabilitation service), or by location of service delivery. There is no useful consistent comprehensive classificatory system, and all classificatory labels may carry hidden implications. EVIDENCE: The evidence suggests that rehabilitation is more effective when given in the patient's own environment. It also suggests that most so-called community rehabilitation teams are relatively short-lived and are not multi-disciplinary and not expert. SOLUTION: We should work towards a network of rehabilitation teams, some specialized in specific diseases or interventions, and some in longer-term involvement with patients in the community with special emphasis on increasing social participation and ensuring good support. At all times we should balance the advantages of delivering the service in the patient's home against the obvious problems concerning practicality and the equitable use of scarce specialist staff time.

Community Health Services↗