Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9605909

Decrease in ventilation time with a standardized weaning process.

H M Horst·D Mouro·R A Hall-Jenssens·N Pamukov
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that standardizing the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation would decrease ventilation times and length of stay in a surgical intensive care unit. DESIGN: Comparison of historic ventilation times with physician-directed weaning with those obtained with protocol-guided weaning by respiratory therapists. SETTING: Urban, teaching surgical intensive care unit with open admission policy and no dominant diagnosis related group. RESULTS: From January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1995, 378 patients who underwent physician-directed weaning from a ventilator had 64488 hours of ventilation, compared with 57796 ventilation hours in 515 patients with protocol-guided weaning (April 1, 1996, through May 31, 1997). The mean hours of ventilation decreased by 58 hours, a 46% decrease (P<.001). The length of hospital stay decreased by 1.77 days (29% change), while the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score remained at 50 to 51. The number of reintubations did not change. The marginal cost savings was $603580. CONCLUSION: Protocol-guided weaning from mechanical ventilation leads to more rapid extubation than physician-directed weaning and has great potential for cost savings.

Explore related subjects

APACHEClinical ProtocolsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StaySurgery Department, HospitalTime FactorsVentilator WeaningJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H M Horst, D Mouro, R A Hall-Jenssens, N Pamukov. 1998. Decrease in ventilation time with a standardized weaning process.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.5.483

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the effects of a communication process that was designed to encourage the use of advanced supportive technology when it is of benefit, but to limit its burdens when it is ineffective. We compared usual care with a proactive, multidisciplinary method of communicating that prospectively identified for patients and families the criteria that would determine whether a care plan was effective at meeting the goals of the patient. This process allowed caregivers to be informed of patient preferences about continued advanced supportive technology when its continuation would result in a compromised functional outcome or death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a before-and-after study in 530 adult medical patients who were consecutively admitted to a university tertiary care hospital for intensive care. Multidisciplinary meetings were held within 72 hours of critical care admission. Patients, families, and the critical care team discussed the care plan and the patients' goals and expectations for the outcome of critical care. Clinical "milestones" indicative of recovery were identified with time frames for their occurrence. Follow-up meetings were held to discuss palliative care options when continued advanced supportive technology was not achieving the patient's goals. We measured length of stay, mortality, and provider team and family consensus in 134 patients before the intensive communication intervention and in 396 patients after the intervention. RESULTS: Intensive communication significantly reduced the median length of stay from 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 11 days) to 3 days (2 to 6 days, P = 0.01 by survival analysis). This reduction remained significant after adjustment for acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 3 score [risk ratio (RR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66 to 0.99; P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis revealed that this reduction occurred in our target group, patients with acuity scores in the highest quartile who died (RR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.92; P = 0.02). The intervention, which allowed dying patients earlier access to palliative care, was not associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive communication was associated with a reduction in critical care use by patients who died. Our multidisciplinary process targeted advanced supportive technology to patients who survived and allowed the earlier withdrawal of advanced supportive technology when it was ineffective.

APACHE↗
PubMed2000

Immunological surrogate parameters in a prognostic model for multi-organ failure and death.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of clinical or biochemical parameters to predict outcome (survival or non-survival; severe or moderate/no complication) using multiple regression analyses. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive cohort study with no interventions SETTING: 12 surgical intensive care units of university hospitals and large community hospitals; four medical school research laboratories in eight European countries PATIENTS: 128 surgical patients with major intra-abdominal surgery admitted for at least two days to an intensive care unit MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of complications or survival based on analysis of clinical (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, Multi-Organ-Failure Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores) and immunological (plasma levels of endotoxin, endotoxin neutralizing capacity, IL-6, IL-8, cell associated IL-8, Fc-receptor polymorphism, soluble CD-14) parameters, with comparison of predicted and actual outcomes. RESULTS: APACHE II, MODS score, MOF score, platelets, IL-6, IL-8, ENC, cell ass. IL-8 were significantly different between survivors and non-survivors and patients with/without severe complications by univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis only MOF, MODS score, IL-6, platelets, comorbidity predicted complications with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 87%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only APACHE II score, plasma IL-8 and complications predicted death (sensitivity 84%; specificity 90%). CONCLUSION: Immunological surrogate parameters may predict complications and death of surgical ICU patients. The use of several parameters may add to increase sensitivity and specificity in a prognostic model.

APACHE↗