Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9571840

Avoiding implant overload.

Abstract

Implant overload can be caused by a great number of factors, including suboptimal implant design and size; an insufficient number of implants to support the restoration; improperly splinted abutments; violation of conventional prosthetic limitations for natural dentition; excessively cantilevered pontics; splinting to natural dentition, even with a stress-breaking attachment; improperly positioned implants; the wrong type of restoration for the clinical condition; loss of supporting bone; excessive parafunctional forces; and non-maintenance of the components. Screws loosening or crestal bone loss are frequently the first detectable signs of implant overload, and warrant immediate action. Other signs of occlusal overload include infection, inflammation and peri-implant radiolucency. Balancing the whole arch, reducing contacts and surface area of the implant-supported areas, and shortening or eliminating cantilevers whenever possible are initial steps that can be taken to eliminate or lessen the excessive stress. The strongest possible implant and restorative materials should be used, and the patient should also be instructed as to proper implant function. As oral implantology develops at a seemingly exponential rate, it is extremely important to keep abreast of the latest advancements. Overload, rather than component design, is the primary factor in the majority of prosthetic and implant failures. Safeguarding the long-term integrity of the restoration should be a shared responsibility involving the patient and the health care team.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D F Swanberg, M D Henry. 1995. Avoiding implant overload.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9571840/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The cone-screw abutment has been shown to diminish micromovement, reducing the burden of component loosening and fracture. However, it is unclear whether the conical taper and joint design influence strength of the interface, with respect to unfavorable bending moments. PURPOSE: This comparative study evaluated the resistance to bending for the ITI Straumann and Astra Tech ST implant systems using an 8- and 11-degree internal cone, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Assembled units from each system were mounted in a 3-point bending apparatus. High load tests were performed, 4 mm from the joint, and bending moments necessary to induce first point of plastic deformation and ultimate failure were measured. All units were inspected to determine the critical zone of failure. RESULTS: Bending moments necessary to induce first point of plastic deformation were considered well above that expected in clinical function for both systems. However, the critical zones of failure differed in that the solid Astra abutment deformed before the cone joint with its 11-degree taper and smooth transition into the neck of the screw, preventing screw fracture. By contrast, all ITI screws fractured at the head of the screw where it met the base of the 8-degree cone. It is unclear which aspects of the joint design were responsible for the difference observed in mode of failure or if it was a direct result of the experimental design. CONCLUSION: For clinically relevant levels of bending moment, no problems were anticipated with respect to component failure for either system.

Dental Abutments↗

Creating a vertical stop for interocclusal records.

This article describes a method of making an accurate interocclusal record when the most distal tooth is an abutment of a fixed partial denture. The method uses conical stops, prepared in the enamel of the abutment or made of composite or a metal core covered with composite, to maintain the vertical dimension of occlusion and to act as a third point of reference for a stable occlusal relationship when occluding the definitive casts. This article also explains how to use the cones and how to make each variety.

Dental Abutments↗

Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis.

This article describes a new rationale and method involved in the fabrication of a patient detachable prosthesis supported by a milled bar. This simple procedure improves prosthesis retention. The overdenture is processed directly over a milled bar, which provides an intimate relation between the bar and the acrylic resin denture base to create resistance against rotational and lateral forces acting on the prosthesis. Incorporating simple and predictable attachments, with low maintenance needs, controls resistance to dislodgment along the path of insertion of the prosthesis. The concepts used in the fabrication of the milled bar include an implant position record (IPR) and an implant position cast (IPC) to reduce the need for time-consuming procedures, such as sectioning the cast bar and soldering it to make it fit the abutments. This procedure also reduces the number of patient visits required of the completion of the prosthesis.

Dental Abutments↗