PubMed · 9571759
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N Suttle. 1998-03-28. Swayback warning.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9571759/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The sheep disease maedi-visna (MV) was introduced into Finland in 1981 and had spread to eight flocks in the southwestern part of the country when first detected in a survey in 1994. Six more seropositive flocks were subsequently traced, bringing the total to 14. MV has a notifiable disease status in Finland that provides for official restrictive measures to which all infected herds are subject. These measures are withdrawn once the seropositive animals and their progeny are culled and the flock has showed negative signs in the test done twice, or after total culling. A voluntary control programme was initiated in January 1995 to extend official control efforts. The programme furnishes a guideline for culling, restrictions on contacts, and a timetable for testing the flock to attain MV-free status. Seven flocks of the 14 were slaughtered either immediately or after a period under restrictive measures. One flock finished sheep production after four years under restrictive measures. Selective culling and repeated testing was attempted with the other six flocks, three of which attained MV-free status. One flock finished sheep production after two years in the control programme, the other two dropped out of the programme when the restrictive measures were withdrawn. It was concluded that the control programme was salient in eradicating MV from Finland and that serological monitoring of the situation must be continuous.
Of 7320 equine foals reported born alive during 1997 on 1043 operations that had equids on 1 January 1997, and that participated in the United States National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) Equine 1998 Study, 120 foals were reported to have died (by either euthanasia or natural causes) within the first 2 days of a live birth. The weighted estimate was 1.7% mortality (standard error=0.5) within the first 2 days of live birth for all foals born on operations in the 28 states included in the study.A multivariable logistic-regression model revealed that foals born in the southern region were more likely to have been reported to have died within the first 2 days of live birth than in the western region. In addition, the following operation-level factors were associated with increased odds of a foal dying within the first 2 days of live birth: not routinely testing newborn foals for adequate absorption of colostral immunoglobulins during the first 2 days of life; adding new resident equids to the operation during 1997; having non-resident equids stay on the operation for 1-30 days during 1997; never requiring an official health certificate (for operations that had non-resident equids stay on the operation for 1-30 days); using something other than straw or hay as the predominant bedding type; and feeding equids a vitamin-mineral supplement/premix with forage and/or grain.
The main experiences from the Danish bovine virus diarrhoea (BVD) eradication programme over 5 years from 1994 to 1999 are presented. The last 3 years of the programme has been strongly supported by legislation. The most important regulations have been blood testing of live animals before movement to other herds, common pastures or exhibitions, and monitoring of all herds at regular intervals for the presence of the infection. Nevertheless, free herds have experienced infection, e.g., 204 dairy herds in 1998. Of herds found to be infected in the period from July 1997 through June 1998 after previously having been registered to be BVD-free, 67 herds were thoroughly investigated. Nineteen herds (28%) were found infected because of purchase of pregnant cows or heifers which delivered persistently infected (PI) calves, and 24 (36%) and two (3%) because of PI animals on neighbouring pastures or in neighbouring farm houses, respectively. In five herds (7%) pregnant heifers had become infected on one and the same common pasture, while in 17 herds (25%) no immediate cause of infection could be demonstrated. Yet, airborne spread from PI herds as a source of infection was suspected in some of these cases. It was furthermore concluded from investigations presented, that antibody-positive AI bulls were a remote but unlikely possibility. Free-living deer in Denmark had to be considered uninfected. Presence of PI-animals in sheep on infected farms has been seen and is paid attention to in individual cases. The results underline the need for legislation to be used in eradication programmes in areas with a high prevalence of infection and to be introduced right from the beginning in order to minimise the risk of infection for free herds.