Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9544512

Inference for odds ratio regression models with sparse dependent data.

Abstract

Suppose the number of 2 x 2 tables is large relative to the average table size, and the observations within a given table are dependent, as occurs in longitudinal or family-based case-control studies. We consider fitting regression models to the odds ratios using table-level covariates. The focus is on methods to obtain valid inferences for the regression parameters beta when the dependence structure is unknown. In this setting, Liang (1985, Biometrika 72, 678-682) has shown that inference based on the noncentral hypergeometric likelihood is sensitive to misspecification of the dependence structure. In contrast, estimating functions based on the Mantel-Haenszel method yield consistent estimators of beta. We show here that, under the estimating function approach, Wald's confidence interval for beta performs well in multiplicative regression models but unfortunately has poor coverage probabilities when an additive regression model is adopted. As an alternative to Wald inference, we present a Mantel-Haenszel quasi-likelihood function based on integrating the Mantel-Haenszel estimating function. A simulation study demonstrates that, in medium-sized samples, the Mantel-Haenszel quasi-likelihood approach yields better inferences than other methods under an additive regression model and inferences comparable to Wald's method under a multiplicative model. We illustrate the use of this quasi-likelihood method in a study of the familial risk of schizophrenia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Hanfelt, K Y Liang. 1998. Inference for odds ratio regression models with sparse dependent data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9544512/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Repeated measures in clinical trials: simple strategies for analysis using summary measures.

The summary measures approach to analysing repeated measures is described. The circumstances under which it can be advantageous to use such measures are considered. Strategies for baseline adjustment where there are multiple baselines are examined, as is the choice of appropriate summary statistic. A compromise trend/mean measure, regression through the origin, is proposed as being useful under some circumstances. An analysis using this measure is illustrated with a suitable example.

Biometry

Prenatal detection of a high-risk group for intrauterine growth restriction based on sonographic fetal biometry.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the significance of sonographic fetal biometry in predicting low birth weight. METHOD: Five hundred and sixty-eight single-term pregnancies were analyzed. They were stratified into seven subgroups by birth weight deviation (BWD). Among the 568 pregnancies, 115 were revealed to be small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (birth weight less than mean -1.5 S. D.). When IUGR was suspected by routine sonographic fetal biometry, 'IUGR work-up' was carried out. The diagnostic performance of our screening method for the detection of SGA pregnancies in the general population was calculated. RESULT: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and odds ratio of our screening method for the detection of SGA pregnancies in the general population were 73.0, 96.6, 83.2, 98.0% and 131.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that sonographic biometry is useful for the prenatal detection of high-risk cases of fetal growth restriction.

Biometry

The biometrical comparison of cardiac imaging methods.

OBJECTIVES: Biometrical comparison procedures for cardiac imaging methods with continuous outcome are reviewed mainly concentrating on assessment and design adequate comparison of accuracy and precision. Univariate graphical and numerical representation of corresponding deviations is outlined to derive a 'check list' of minimum information necessary to compare the measurement methods. DATA: The methods reviewed here are illustrated by the comparison of standard 2DE bidimensional cardial volumetry versus assessment using TDE colour imaging in 28 normal probands. SOURCES: The paired t-test and the corresponding confidence interval approach are used to assess deviations in location of two imaging methods; the test procedures of Maloney and Rastogi Hahn and Nelson and Grubbs are surveyed as proposals for the comparison of precisions in paired data. The Krippendorff coefficient and the Bradley/Blackwood test are illustrated as surrogate measures for method concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Since these methods can be performed by simple modification of standard options available in most statistics software packages, this review intends to enable cardiologists to choose appropriate methods for statistical data analysis and representation on their own.

Biometry