Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9536372

Lines and Gabor functions compared as spatial visual stimuli.

Abstract

Foveal discrimination thresholds were measured for orientation, vernier alignment, bisection, displacement detection and stereoscopic acuity using simple line stimuli and also sinusoidal grating patches with gaussian intensity modulation (Gabor stimuli). Stimulus parameters such as luminance, exposure duration, component separation and, as far as possible, length were identical for both. Orientation discrimination as a function of length is almost identical for the two classes of stimuli, some observers performing slightly better with Gabor patches. Thresholds for displacement detection are also the same. Vernier, stereo and bisection acuities, however, are considerable better with line than with Gabor stimuli.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Westheimer. 1998. Lines and Gabor functions compared as spatial visual stimuli.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00192-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Direct evidence for the existence of energy-based texture mechanisms.

Two classes of models have been proposed to explain how the visual system processes texture modulations. In 'feature models', abstract representations of the featural properties of local texture regions (eg orientation, spatial frequency, contrast) are first generated, after which differences in individual feature properties across space are detected. In 'energy models', on the other hand, differences across space in the response energies of linear simple-cell-like filters are detected. This model thus processes the existing differences between texture regions directly without generating a full representation of the individual texture regions. We provide here direct evidence for the existence of the second, energy model, using an adaptation paradigm in conjunction with textures simultaneously modulated in two dimensions--orientation and spatial frequency. We found that the mechanism that processed the conjoint modulation was tuned to orientations and spatial frequencies that could not be predicted by any feature model, but which were precisely predicted by the energy model.

Differential Threshold↗