Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9534371

Rational predictable posthole preparation.

Abstract

Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth is a common occurrence in everyday dental practice. Unfortunately, clinical posthole preparation seems to be a random technique. Even for a prefabricated post supplied with matching drills, the task is often difficult or not straightforward. Some questions inevitably arise. How long should the posthole be? How wide should the canal be prepared? How can the proper width be maintained so that the prefabricated post does not strip in the canal and lose its retention? If it is decided to use a cast post, what is the best posthole preparation to maximize retention? Is there an easy way to avoid perforating the root while preparing the canal for the post? Clinically, how can the posthole be prepared quickly, easily, and predictably every time? These key questions must be addressed when preparing the posthole.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A S Deutsch, B L Musikant, B I Cohen. 1997. Rational predictable posthole preparation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9534371/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There are few research studies concerning prefabricated posts overdenture attachment systems using multiple pull cycles. PURPOSE: This study tested 6 prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems (AccessPost Overdenture, ERA white and ERA grey, Flexi-Overdenture, O-SO and ZAAG) measured to simulate wear over a 2000 pull cycle and compared the in vitro retention, measured (pounds). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of the pounds of force necessary to separate each system were made at the beginning of testing, at pull 10 and then at every 50th pull until the 2000th pull was attained. All pulls were performed manually with a Shimpo force gauge. Absolute force (AF) and relative force (RF) were compared, AF being the force required at any pull to separate the overdenture device, whereas RF is the force required at the first pull. RESULTS: There was considerable difference of the force required at pull 1 for the ERA white, O-SO and ZAAG anchor systems, then the AccessPost overdenture, and finally the Flexi-Overdenture and ERA grey attachment systems. CONCLUSION: At pull 2000, there was no statistical difference between any of the attachments studied. The amount of force necessary to offer functional retention to a specific patient wearing an overdenture may vary considerably, depending on the many factors in fabricating the overdenture, and the age, strength, musculature, and the expectations of the patient.

Dental Prosthesis Retention

A new paradigm for the construction and service of fixed prosthodontics.

Some of the most disheartening things that can happen to restorative dentists is to be faced with problems, complications, and failures in their own fixed prosthodontics. A highly advantageous technique for removing existing restorations and creating removable cement-retained fixed prosthodontics has been described. In the history of crown and bridge prosthodontics, there has not been a proven precision technique to remove these restorations, with the exception of screw-retained implant prostheses, which exhibit many disadvantages. This new paradigm provides a new dimension to the practice of dentistry and allows for the repair, service, and maintenance of restorations in ways that have never been done in the past. Removing crowns and fixed bridges can be learned like any other dental skill, such as endodontics or taking accurate impressions. Skill and confidence comes when the technique has been performed on a large variety of cases. Being able to quickly and easily remove these restorations can certainly be rewarding and reduce a lot of stress.

Dental Prosthesis Retention