Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9533331

Complete denture impressioning technique.

Abstract

This article describes a technique that simplifies the making of an edentulous arch impression before the fabrication of a complete denture. Making an impression of an edentulous arch requires a unique combination of managing movable soft tissue commensurate with integrating different materials and a technique for accurate reproduction. The technique described requires a two-phase approach using a syringeable addition silicone during the border molding process and a condensation silicone wash material to capture the soft tissue while the functional border molding is repeated. These more recently developed products allow us to achieve similar results and are easier, faster, and more predictable than those products used previously.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Kois, P P Fan. 1997. Complete denture impressioning technique.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9533331/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dual-arch trays are often used to make simultaneous impressions of a prepared tooth and the opposing teeth. Many dentists are concerned with the accuracy of the casts generated from this type of impression. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the accuracy of stone casts of a prepared tooth generated using 2 types of dual-arch impression tray/impression material combinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The maxillary left first molar on a dentoform mounted on an articulator was prepared for a full-coverage gold crown. Ten impressions were made with either a plastic (P) or metal (M) tray and a polyether (PE) or vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material. Each impression was cast in improved dental stone, and the buccolingual dimension of the die was measured at the midpoint of the buccal and lingual gingival margins. The prepared tooth (T) served as the control. The data were analyzed using a 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) alpha=.05. RESULTS: The P/VPS combination (10.673 mm) produced the largest die, followed by P/PE (10.602), T (10.508), M/PE (10.484), and M/VPS (10.472). The 2-factor ANOVA showed a significant difference between the tray types but not between the impression materials. CONCLUSION: The metal trays produced dies smaller than the tooth, and the plastic trays produced dies that were larger.

Dental Impression Materials↗

An in vitro comparison of 5 techniques for impressing dowel space preparations.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared 5 different dowel space impression techniques using polyvinyl siloxane impression material to determine which method produced fewer voids in the dowel space impression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five techniques were used to make impressions of a prepared dowel space in a simulated endodontically treated tooth. Technique I used a 25-gauge anesthetic needle to act as a vent at the apex of the preparation to reduce voids produced during the expression of light body impression material. The anesthetic needle was removed after the impression material was injected, and an impression post was then inserted to the depth of the preparation. Twenty impressions made using this technique were compared with other techniques that used the vent without a post, no vent with a post, no vent without a post, and a lentulo spiral with a post (Techniques II through V, respectively). The percentage of impressions with voids from each group was compared to determine which technique consistently produced a void-free impression of the complete preparation length. If voids were observed in the impression, the specimen was considered inadequate. RESULTS: The percents of void-free impressions using Techniques I through V were 100%, 70%, 40%, 60%, and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a 25-gauge needle as a vent while expressing impression material into the dowel space followed by placing the impression post consistently produced void-free dowel space impressions.

Dental Impression Materials↗

An alternative putty/wash impression technique.

Conventionally, custom trays have been made in the laboratory on casts constructed from preliminary impressions. A spaced tray made in this way allows a uniform thickness of impression material of approximately 2 mm which is said to enhance the accuracy of the impression-taking procedure. A technique is described to fulfill this criterion without the need for a primary impression, by constructing a spaced putty custom tray inside the mouth.

Dental Impression Materials↗