Does cesarean section decrease the incidence of major birth trauma?

S Puza; N Roth; G A Macones; M T Mennuti; M A Morgan

PubMed · 9527937

Does cesarean section decrease the incidence of major birth trauma?

S Puza·N Roth·G A Macones·M T Mennuti·M A Morgan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increase in frequency of cesarean section is associated with a decreased incidence of major birth trauma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating all neonatal cases of major birth trauma from January 1989 to December 1994. Major birth trauma was defined as peripheral plexus or nerve injuries, fractures, or lacerations. The data were grouped into two mutually exclusive periods (January 1989 to December 1990 vs January 1991 to December 1994) in which a significant difference in the cesarean section rate was known. RESULTS: Of 17,957 deliveries during the period, 141 cases of birth trauma occurred. One hundred thirty-seven of the 141 medical records were available for review, and 116 were classified as having had major birth trauma and were included in the study. The overall incidence of major birth trauma was 6.5/1000 deliveries. During the two-year period (January 1989 to December 1990), 18.3% of deliveries were by cesarean section and the major birth trauma rate was 8.4/1000 deliveries. During the following 4 years, the cesarean section rate was 22.3% and the major birth trauma rate was 5.3/1000 deliveries. Significant differences in the birth trauma chi(2) = 6.12, p = 0.013) and cesarean section (chi(2) = 40.80, p < 0.001) rates were observed. Controlling for the mode of delivery lessened the association between time period and birth trauma incidence (chi(2)MH = 3.28, p = 0.07). A significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma in neonates delivered by cesarean section in the later period was discovered (relative risk = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.97). This decrease appeared to be mediated by a decrease in total lacerations between the periods (chi(2) = 11.76, p < 0.001), because the rates of other types of major birth trauma did not differ in neonates delivered by cesarean section or the vaginal route. CONCLUSIONS: With a 4% increase in rate of cesarean section at our institution, a significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma was observed. This finding cannot be explained by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma in patients delivering vaginally, but rather by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma at cesarean section during the latter period.

Explore related subjects

Birth Injuries Case-Control Studies Cesarean Section Cohort Studies Delivery, Obstetric Female Humans Incidence Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Wounds, Penetrating Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S Puza, N Roth, G A Macones, M T Mennuti, M A Morgan. Does cesarean section decrease the incidence of major birth trauma?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9527937/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perinatal outcome in a series of macrosomic fetuses according to the intended mode of delivery, and to estimate the individual risk of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury upon information available either prior the onset of labor or at delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Perinatal and postnatal information of 3356 women who delivered during a 10-year period a macrosomic fetus (>4500 g) in vertex presentation were analyzed. After the exclusion of cases with extraneous factors that may have affected the health of the neonate, patient and neonatal characteristics were compared according to the intended mode of delivery. The contribution of factors known prior labor and at the time of deliver on the occurrence of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury was analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 2371 women were admitted to spontaneous labor, 778 underwent an induction of labor, and 207 had an elective cesarean section. All cases of shoulder dystocia (n=310), and brachial plexus injury (n=94) occurred among women who delivered vaginally. The rate of brachial plexus injury was higher in cases who had shoulder dystocia than in those who did not (58/310 versus 36/2329, P<0.001). The incidence of brachial plexus injury increases steadily from 0.8 in fetuses weighing 4500-4599 g to 2.86% in those weighing more than 5000 g (P<0.01) and from 2.1 in women taller than 180 cm to 12.5% in those shorter than 155 cm (P<0.05). After adjustment for confounding variables shoulder dystocia (OR 9.2, 95% C.I. 5.38; 15.59), operative vaginal delivery (OR 1.96, 95% C.I. 1.10; 3.49) and clavicular fracture (OR 2.9, 95% C.I. 1.31; 6.44) remained predictors of brachial plexus injury. CONCLUSION: Since some of these risk factors are known prior to delivery, each woman whose fetus is suspected to weight more than 4500 g should be counseled on her individual risk of severe perinatal morbidity before a decision on the mode of delivery is taken.

Birth Injuries↗

PubMed2003

Orthopaedic sequelae in neurologically recovered obstetrical brachial plexus injury. Case study and literature review.

PURPOSE: Description of shoulder sequelae in obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI) patients who had spontaneous functional recovery, in the context of historical and current conservative methods of treatment. METHOD: Case study of a baby with serious complications, followed by a review of the literature from 1900 until 2001 about conservative treatment of OBPI with respect to the prevention of shoulder complications. RESULTS: Description of contractures and bony deformities did not show important discrepancies over time, other than more detailed images because of new technical possibilities. There is no agreement on the explanation of the development of these deformities. Secondary changes caused by muscular imbalance and longstanding contracture are recognized by all authors. A primary osteoarticular lesion was recognized as a possible cause in the beginning of the twentieth century, then forgotten for a long time and only in the 1980s had gained interest again. The main change in treatment concerns the use of arm braces. This was strongly recommended in the first half of the twentieth century, then advised against and is at this moment not anymore mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus on the cause of contractures and bony deformities in children with OBPI. Conservative methods of treatment have changed over the years, without research on the outcome of these treatment changes.

Birth Injuries↗

PubMed2003

Extensive somatosensory innervation in infants with obstetric brachial palsy.

In the pre-operative screening of infants with obstetric brachial palsy (OBP), the results of routine electromyography are often overly optimistic when compared to the peri-operative findings. This prompted us to include investigation of the sensory innervation of these infants using the N20 (the first cortical response to a peripheral stimulation) of the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). Three to seven months after birth, SSEP were recorded at the skull after stimulation of the thumb and middle finger in infants with obstetric rupture of the upper trunk or avulsion of roots C5, C6, or C7, and in whom no clinical improvement of motor function was observed in the biceps brachii and deltoid muscles. In most infants, a normal N20 could be evoked, indicating the existence of peripheral sensory pathways. From the thumb, these sensory pathways would necessarily bypass the upper trunk and dorsal roots of spinal nerves C5 and C6, and from the middle finger bypass the middle trunk and dorsal root C7, before extending into the dorsal column and projecting toward the thalamus and cerebral cortex. These data suggest that in infancy the segmental sensory innervation of the hand is more diverse than is described in most textbooks.

Birth Injuries↗