Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9493679

Exercise training in COPD patients: the basic questions.

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation programmes aim at improving exercise capacity, activities of daily living, quality of life and perhaps survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recently, well-designed studies investigated and confirmed the efficacy of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, including exercise training, breathing exercises, optimal medical treatment, psychosocial support and health education. In the present overview, the contribution of exercise training in clinical practice to the demonstrated effects of pulmonary rehabilitation is discussed by means of six basic questions. These include: 1) the significance of exercise training; 2) the optimal intensity for exercise training; 3) prescribing training modalities; 4) the effects of exercise training combined with medication, nutrition or oxygen; 5) how training effects should be maintained; and 6) where the rehabilitation programme should be performed: in-patient, out-patient or homecare? First, exercise training has been proven to be an essential component of pulmonary rehabilitation. Training intensity is of key importance. High-intensity training (>70% maximal workload) is feasible even in patients with more advanced COPD. In addition, the effects on peripheral muscle function and ventilatory adaptations are superior to low-intensity training. There is, however, no consensus on the optimal training modalities. Both walking and cycling improved exercise performance. Since peripheral muscle function has been recognized as an important contributor to exercise performance, specific peripheral muscle training recently gained interest. Improved submaximal exercise performance and increased quality of life were found after muscle training. The optimal training regimen (strength or endurance) and the muscle groups to be trained, remain to be determined. Training of respiratory muscles is recommended in patients with ventilatory limitation during exercise. The additional effects of anabolic-androgenic drugs, oxygen and nutrition are not well-established in COPD patients and need further research. In order to maintain training effects, close attention of the rehabilitation team is required. The continuous training frequency necessary to maintain training effects remains to be defined. At this point in time, out-patient-based programmes show the best results and guarantee the best supervision and a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should focus on the role of homecare programmes to maintain improvements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Gosselink, T Troosters, M Decramer. 1997. Exercise training in COPD patients: the basic questions.. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10122884

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Creating a robust public health infrastructure for physical activity promotion.

The essential role of physical activity both as an independent protective factor against numerous common chronic diseases and as a means to maintain a healthy weight is gaining increasing scientific recognition. Although the science of physical activity promotion is advancing rapidly, the practice of promoting physical activity at a population level is in its infancy. The virtual absence of a public health practice infrastructure for the promotion of physical activity at the local level presents a critical challenge to control policy for chronic disease, and particularly obesity. To translate the increasing evidence of the value of physical activity into practice will require systemic, multilevel, and multisectoral intervention approaches that build individual capability and organizational capacity for behavior change, create new social norms, and promote policy and environmental changes that support higher levels of energy expenditure across the population. This paper highlights societal changes contributing to inactivity; describes the evolution and current status of population-based public health physical activity promotion efforts in research and practice settings; suggests strategies for engaging decision makers, stakeholders, and the general public in building the necessary infrastructure to effectively promote physical activity; and identifies specific recommendations to spur the creation of a robust public health infrastructure for physical activity.

Exercise↗

Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and insulin resistance: a short update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and/or habitual physical activity are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. The responsible mechanisms are multifarious, but effects on insulin sensitivity are likely to play an important role. The purpose of this review is to highlight some recent evidence on the interrelationships between physical activity, fitness, obesity, genotype and insulin resistance. RECENT FINDINGS: Effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and abdominal obesity are both likely to contribute to the insulin-sensitizing effects of regular physical activity. Recent data suggest that at least in older adults, the intensity of an exercise intervention may influence the magnitude of changes in insulin sensitivity, and emerging data suggest that individual changes in insulin sensitivity following an exercise programme may, in part, be influenced by genotype. SUMMARY: Increasing physical activity reduces insulin resistance. As both intensity of exercise and genetic factors may modulate the magnitude of this effect, current physical activity for health guidelines that emphasize engagement in moderate-intensity physical activity in a 'one-size-fits-all' approach may need revision in the future to optimize the potential benefits accrued from individuals becoming more active.

Exercise↗