Conjunctivitis.

G L Morrow; R L Abbott

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9490996

Conjunctivitis.

G L Morrow·R L Abbott

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Conjunctivitis refers to any inflammatory condition of the membrane that lines the eyelids and covers the exposed surface of the sclera. It is the most common cause of "red eye". The etiology can usually be determined by a careful history and an ocular examination, but culture is occasionally necessary to establish the diagnosis or to guide therapy. Conjunctivitis is commonly caused by bacteria and viruses. Neisseria infection should be suspected when severe, bilateral, purulent conjunctivitis is present in a sexually active adult or in a neonate three to five days postpartum. Conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae requires aggressive antibiotic therapy, but conjunctivitis due to other bacteria is usually self-limited. Chronic conjunctivitis is usually associated with blepharitis, recurrent styes or meibomianitis. Treatment requires good eyelid hygiene and the application of topical antibiotics as determined by culture. Allergic conjunctivitis is distinguished by severe itching and allergen exposure. This condition is generally treated with topical antihistamines, mast-cell stabilizers or anti-inflammatory agents.

Explore related subjects

Acute Disease Algorithms Bacterial Infections Chronic Disease Conjunctivitis Diagnosis, Differential Humans Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

G L Morrow, R L Abbott. 1998-02-15. Conjunctivitis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9490996/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for acute aortic dissection is either surgical or medical therapy, depending on the morphologic features of the lesion and any associated complications. Irrespective of the form of treatment, the associated mortality and morbidity are considerable. METHODS: We studied the placement of endovascular stent-grafts across the primary entry tear for the management of acute aortic dissection originating in the descending thoracic aorta. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transluminal stent-graft placement over the entry tear in 4 patients with acute type A aortic dissections (which involve the ascending aorta) and 15 patients with acute type B aortic dissections (which are confined to the descending aorta). Dissections involved aortic branches in 14 of the 19 patients (74 percent), and symptomatic compromise of multiple branch vessels was observed in 7 patients (37 percent). The stent-grafts were made of self-expanding stainless-steel covered with woven polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene material. RESULTS: Placement of endovascular stent-grafts across the primary entry tears was technically successful in all 19 patients. Complete thrombosis of the thoracic aortic false lumen was achieved in 15 patients (79 percent), and partial thrombosis was achieved in 4 (21 percent). Revascularization of ischemic branch vessels, with subsequent relief of corresponding symptoms, occurred in 76 percent of the obstructed branches. Three of the 19 patients died within 30 days, for an early mortality rate of 16 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 32 percent). There were no deaths and no instances of aneurysm or aortic rupture during the subsequent average follow-up period of 13 months. CONCLUSIONS: These initial results suggest that stent-graft coverage of the primary entry tear may be a promising new treatment for selected patients with acute aortic dissection. This technique requires further evaluation, however, to assess its therapeutic potential fully.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Improving the evaluation of benign low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, blind study was conducted to investigate the factors underlying the decisions of expert clinicians in diagnosis of acute, benign low back pain, compared with results obtained with an automated physical examination by machine. From the results, a strategy to significantly improve clinical diagnosis in cases of discordance was determined. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors in the clinical assessment of low back pain that indicate when independent diagnostic testing would be useful. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical evaluation of low back pain is often dominated by subjective reports of pain. Published medical literature has underscored several inherent weaknesses of the clinical examination, and concerns have been raised about its effectiveness for assessing patients with low back pain. Thus, it has been proposed that objective measures to complement the clinician's examination would be beneficial in the formulation of dependable diagnoses. METHODS: Randomly designated subjects, who in describing their conditions were objective or role playing, were assessed by clinicians and a machine for diagnosis of low back pain assessment versus normal backs. Each subject's pain assessment was compared with a gold standard that was established by experts in low back pain. Components of the clinical examination were analyzed to assess which were the most informative in making a reliable diagnosis. The information content of the machine assessment was also analyzed and a strategy to complement the clinical diagnosis with the machine diagnosis determined. RESULTS: Discordance among the various components of the clinical examination was a strong indicator of when the efficacy of the clinical examination dropped below a random level of decision making. When there was discordance, incorporating the functional evaluation by machine into the clinical diagnosis improved the performance of the clinician. Notably, in nonobjective subjects, the accuracy of diagnosis was enhanced by as much as 69%. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis by incorporating a functional evaluation by machine when there is discordance between physical examination findings and reported pain.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential findings in acute and chronic spinal canal compromise.

STUDY DESIGN: Early and long-term postoperative outcome were analyzed by retrospective record review and compared with results of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) findings in 70 patients with chronic lumbar stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adverse SEP changes occur in up to 2% of patients during scoliosis surgery and may reverse with intraoperative intervention. Little is known about the short- or long-term results of intraoperative intervention based on adverse SEP changes in patients with chronic lumbar stenosis during lumbar decompression and fusion. OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative SEP changes with immediate and long-term neurologic outcome in patients undergoing lumbar decompression, instrumentation and fusion for chronic lumbar stenosis and to determine whether the early correlation between intraoperative SEP deterioration and clinical outcome persisted. METHODS: Monitoring SEPs using an alternating arm and leg stimulation paradigm allowed rapid identification of intraoperative changes. Retrospective record review was conducted without knowledge of intraoperative SEP findings. Clinical and SEP findings were then compared, to determine whether the strong association between intraoperative SEP results and early clinical outcome persisted. RESULTS: Nine of 12 patients who had unilateral intraoperative SEP deterioration that resolved with intervention had no adverse sequelae; the remaining three had new ipsilateral weakness that persisted during a 9-24-month follow-up. Intraoperative SEPs deteriorated in 15% of patients with normal and abnormal baseline SEPs. Intraoperative SEP deterioration could not be predicted by preoperative radicular pain, focal symptomatology or baseline SEP findings. 80% of patients with normal SEPs but only 54% with abnormal SEPs had immediate and sustained pain relief. SEP deterioration that reversed with surgical intervention or high-dose steroids resulted in no adverse neurologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Acute, unilateral, unresolved intraoperative SEP deterioration was associated with long-term ipsilateral weakness not predicted by clinical or neurologic findings before surgery. Clinical improvement persisted in 92% of patients, 4% were unchanged, and 4% had persistent neurologic changes during an average 12-month follow-up period. The findings underscore the need for monitoring SEPs during surgery in all patients undergoing invasive lumbar surgery and for rapid identification and intervention should a unilateral SEP change persist.

Acute Disease↗