Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9489286

Team building. Making collaborative practice work.

Abstract

Collaborative practice offers great promise for maximizing the unique contributions and enhancing the satisfaction of everyone involved in health care, including the consumer. Developing collaborative relationships, however, requires much time and effort. Significant attitudinal, institutional, and behavioral barriers exist. Collaboration occurs between individuals, and each one must understand the concept of collaboration and be committed to investing the time and energy required to develop the relationship and overcome the barriers. The author describes critical attributes of collaboration and discusses how they can be developed and demonstrated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S R Stapleton. Team building. Making collaborative practice work.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-2182(97)00119-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

CONTEXT: Despite wide promulgation, clinical practice guidelines have had limited effect on changing physician behavior. Little is known about the process and factors involved in changing physician practices in response to guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To review barriers to physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), and HealthSTAR databases (January 1966 to January 1998); bibliographies; textbooks on health behavior or public health; and references supplied by experts to find English-language article titles that describe barriers to guideline adherence. STUDY SELECTION: Of 5658 articles initially identified, we selected 76 published studies describing at least 1 barrier to adherence to clinical practice guidelines, practice parameters, clinical policies, or national consensus statements. One investigator screened titles to identify candidate articles, then 2 investigators independently reviewed the texts to exclude articles that did not match the criteria. Differences were resolved by consensus with a third investigator. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators organized barriers to adherence into a framework according to their effect on physician knowledge, attitudes, or behavior. This organization was validated by 3 additional investigators. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 76 articles included 120 different surveys investigating 293 potential barriers to physician guideline adherence, including awareness (n = 46), familiarity(n = 31), agreement (n = 33), self-efficacy (n = 19), outcome expectancy (n = 8), ability to overcome the inertia of previous practice (n = 14), and absence of external barriers to perform recommendations (n = 34). The majority of surveys (70 [58%] of 120) examined only 1 type of barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on improving physician guideline adherence may not be generalizable, since barriers in one setting may not be present in another. Our review offers a differential diagnosis for why physicians do not follow practice guidelines, as well as a rational approach toward improving guideline adherence and a framework for future research.

Attitude of Health Personnel