Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9476092

Anesthesia systems.

Abstract

This report updates our 1996 Evaluation of systems used to administer inhalation (general) anesthesia (Health Devices 25[5-6], May-June 1996). In that issue, we evaluated a total of six systems (in nine configurations) manufactured by North American Drager (NAD) and Ohmeda. In this Update, we evaluate two additional models--the Cato and the Cicero EM, both of which are manufactured by Dräger Medizintechnik GmbH--according to the same test protocol. In the Conclusions section, we present a complete listing of the anesthesia systems we have evaluated to date in rating and ranking order. As in our original study, we base our conclusions largely on degree of system integration, suitability of the system for various types of procedures, and cost. Dräger Medizintechnik GmbH is the medical division of Drägerwerk AG (Lübeck, Germany), which is also the parent company of U.S.-based NAD--the manufacturer of three of the systems evaluated in our original study. Although both Dräger and NAD sell their products internationally, Drger's products are not sold in North America, and NAD's products are not sold in Germany. Thus, the two products evaluated in this issue are not available in the United States or Canada. This report, however, should be of interest to all our readers, including those in North America, because the newly evaluated systems have advanced features that, in the future, may be available in some form on systems marketed in North America.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1998. Anesthesia systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9476092/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

General anesthesia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anesthesia, General

Comparison of evoked cortical activity in conscious and propofol-anesthetized rats using functional MRI.

Changes in cortical activity during foot shock were assessed under conscious and propofol-anesthetized conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Increases in signal intensity were observed in the contralateral somatosensory cortex in response to electrical shock of the hindpaw under both conditions. These increases in cortical signal ranged from 6% to 26% while awake and from 1% to 6% under propofol anesthesia. In each of the six animals studied, the largest increase in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD)-based signal intensity was observed during consciousness. In three of six animals, propofol anesthesia depressed signal intensity by as much as 10-fold, showing that the level of cortical activity during foot shock is dampened by anesthesia. These results indicate it would be advantageous to use fully conscious animals to maximize BOLD-based MRI signal in certain behavioral studies using MR spectrometers with modest field strengths (1.0-2.0 T).

Anesthesia, General