Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9459291

Anion gap acidosis.

Abstract

Although an anion gap at less than 20 mEq/L rarely has a defined etiology, significant elevations in the anion gap almost always signify presence of an acidosis that can be easily identified. Anion gap acidoses can be divided into those caused by lactate accumulation, ketoacid production, toxin/drugs, and uremia. Lactic acidoses caused by decreased oxygen delivery or defective oxygen utilization are associated with high mortality. The treatment of lactic acidosis is controversial. The use of bicarbonate to increase pH is rarely successful and, by generating PCO2, may worsen outcome. Ketoacidosis is usually secondary to diabetes or alcohol. Treatment is aimed at turning off ketogenesis and repairing fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. Methanol, ethylene glycol, and salicylates are responsible for the majority of toxin-induced anion gap acidoses. Both methanol and ethylene glycol are associated with severe acidoses and elevated osmolar gaps. Treatment of both is alcohol infusion to decrease formation of toxic metabolites and dialyses to remove toxins. Salicylate toxicity usually is associated with a mild metabolic acidosis and a respiratory alkalosis. Uremia is associated with a mild acidosis secondary to decreased ammonia secretion and an anion gap caused by the retention of unmeasured anions. A decrease in anion gap is caused by numerous mechanisms and thus has little clinical utility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Ishihara, H M Szerlip. 1998. Anion gap acidosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9459291/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The weighted walking test as an alternative method of assessing aerobic power.

The aim of the present study was to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) directly during uphill walking exercise and to compare these values with those achieved during running and cycling exercise. Forty untrained students (20 males and 20 females) took part in three exercise tests. The running test was performed on a horizontal treadmill and the speed was gradually increased by 0.3 m . s(-1) every 3 min. The walking test was conducted on a treadmill inclined at 12% (speed of 1.8 m . s(-1)). The load was further increased every 3 min by the addition of a mass of one-twentieth of the body mass of the participant (plastic containers filled with water and added to a backpack carried by the participant). During the bicycle ergometry test, the workload was increased by 20 W every 2 min. All tests were performed until volitional exhaustion. During all tests, oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory frequency, heart rate, hydrogen ion concentration, base excess, and blood lactate concentration were analysed. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the weighted walking test and the commonly applied running and bicycle ergometry tests indicate a strong association with the new test in evaluating maximal oxygen uptake. The negligible differences in VO2max between the three tests for the male participants (running: 61.0 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); walking: 60.4 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); cycling: 60.2 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)), and the fact that the females achieved better results on the walking test than the cycle ergometer test (running: 45.0 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); walking: 42.6 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1); cycling: 40.1 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)), confirm the suitability of the new method for evaluating aerobic power. The weighted walking test could be useful in the assessment of aerobic power in individuals for whom running is not advised or is difficult. In addition, the new test allows for determination of VO2max on small treadmills with a limited speed regulator, such as those found in specialist physiotherapy and fitness centres.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗

Mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay: results of a nonrandomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a mandatory protocol for treating diabetic ketoacidosis. DESIGN: Chart review of patients treated before and after protocol implementation. SETTING: University-affiliated U.S. public teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 241 consecutive nonpregnant patients >18 yrs old admitted to a medical intensive care unit for diabetic ketoacidosis between January 2000 and January 2005. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a mandatory treatment protocol in May 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, time to correction of anion gap and ketone clearance, and hypoglycemic episodes. RESULTS: Before protocol implementation, the mean +/- sd intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 44 +/- 28 hrs and 91 +/- 73 hrs, respectively. After implementation, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay decreased 23% and 30%, to 34 +/- 18 hrs and 64 +/- 41 hrs, respectively (both p < .007). Time to anion gap closure and ketone clearance also decreased (both p < .05). No difference in the number of hypoglycemic episodes was observed. CONCLUSION: Implementing a mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care and hospital lengths of stay and time to anion gap closure and ketone clearance, without increasing the rate of hypoglycemia.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗