Facial implants.

M R Arcuri; J T Rubenstein

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9421675

Facial implants.

M R Arcuri·J T Rubenstein

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The application of endosseous dental implants for the retention and stabilization of extraoral prostheses and hearing aids has been shown to be effective functionally and aesthetically. Implants have reduced the need for adhesive use, simplifying cleaning procedures and thus extending the life of the prosthesis. Implant-retained prostheses have provided patients the opportunity to participate in routine activities such as work, shopping, swimming, and jogging with less fear of losing their prosthesis. The implants' impact on patients has resulted in their ability to function in society with confidence that their defects will be less noticeable and their ability to respond to the environment enhanced. The culmination of these effects have without doubt improved the overall quality of life for patients. As with any new technology, its application will encounter unanticipated problems and some limitations in use. As the art and science of this technique evolve, however, it is anticipated that it will result in the ability to provide improved health care for patients.

Explore related subjects

Activities of Daily Living Adhesives Dental Implants Ear, External Esthetics Eye, Artificial Face Hearing Aids Humans Maxillofacial Prosthesis Medical Laboratory Science Nose Prostheses and Implants Prosthesis Design Quality of Life Social Adjustment Technology, Dental Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M R Arcuri, J T Rubenstein. 1998. Facial implants.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9421675/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study on the results of surgical treatment of compressive cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age. OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical features and surgical outcomes of compressive cervical myelopathy in aged patients and to discuss the role of surgical treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few data focused on the outcomes of surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy who are more than 75 years of age. METHODS: Seventeen patients with compressive cervical myelopathy who underwent surgery were reviewed. The average age at the time of surgery was 77.2 years. Posterior decompression in 15 patients and anterior decompression in 2 patients were performed. Neurologic deficits before and after surgery were assessed using a scoring system proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score). Independence of daily living was evaluated. Radiologic features were examined with radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical results were compared with those of patients less than 65 years old as a control. RESULTS: The preoperative mean JOA score was 6.1, the postoperative maximum JOA scores averaged 11.4, and the recovery rate was 48.4%. These were significantly inferior to scores in those less than 65 years of age. All seven of the patients who could not walk even with aids before surgery became independent in daily activities after surgery. At the final follow-up, the mean JOA score had decreased to 10.7 and the recovery rate to 39.1%. Five of nine patients whose follow-up periods were more than 5 years showed decreases in JOA score, although all patients were still ambulatory. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decompression for cervical myelopathy appears to be beneficial, even in patients more than 75 years of age, in improving neurologic function and ability to engage in activities of daily living.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1999

The validity in persons with spinal cord injury of a self-reported functional measure derived from the functional independence measure.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, mailed survey on impairment and function using 6361 respondents to the Spinal Cord Dysfunction National Veterans Survey who reported spinal cord injury as the sole cause of their spinal cord dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To establish the concurrent and construct validities of a Self-Reported Functional Measure appropriate for use in patients with spinal cord injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Functional assessment is of increasing importance in clinical care, quality assurance, and national health-care planning. There is a conspicuous need for validated functional assessment measures that are rapid, reliable, and appropriate for use in the disabled population. METHODS: The correlation was examined of hours of personal assistance, number of affected limbs, amount of motor impairment, and amount of combined limb-motor impairment to Self-Reported Functional Measure response tertile (scores, 13-32, 33-45, 46-52; lower scores indicated worse function). RESULTS: There were statistically significant correlations between Self-Reported Functional Measure score and hours of personal assistance (P < 0.001), the number of affected limbs (P < 0.001), the amount of motor impairment (P < 0.001), and the amount of combined limbmotor impairment (P < 0.001). For example, 87% of people with the most limb-motor impairment (four affected limbs and no useful movement) were in the lowest Self-Reported Functional Measure tertile, compared with 3% of people in the least-affected category of limb-motor impairment. Furthermore, visual, sensory, or memory impairment did not influence the correlation between limbmotor impairment and Self-Reported Functional Measure score. CONCLUSION: The Self-Reported Functional Measure shows good concurrent and construct validities.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1999

A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 71 patients who underwent lumbar fusion, with or without transpedicular instrumentation. The patients completed a questionnaire that determined pain relief, medication use, return to work, and overall satisfaction with surgery. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect, if any, of instrumentation on the outcome of lumbar fusion surgery, according to reports of the patients, and whether there is a correlation between the radiographic determination of a solid fusion and the same patient-reported outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature on this topic reports pseudarthrosis rates from 0% to 57% and good to excellent results from 56% to 95%. These studies provide no clear-cut recommendations concerning the effect of added lumbar instrumentation on patient-reported outcome in a prospective manner using concurrent control subjects. METHODS: The patients were randomized to groups with and without instrumentation after deciding to undergo a lumbar fusion and consenting to enter the study. Radiographs were obtained and questionnaires filled out at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in patient-reported outcome between the two groups. There was a slight nonsignificant trend toward increased radiographic fusion rate in the group with instrumentation that did not correlate with an increased patient-reported improvement rate. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not provide data that indicate a benefit in outcome from added instrumentation in elective lumbar fusions.

Activities of Daily Living↗