Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9411911

[Medical equipment--errors, causes and risks].

Abstract

Development in technology has introduced advanced technological apparatus into the health care sector. New technology has led to increased possibilities in diagnostics and treatment, but it also represents a substantial risk. A survey at the Lillehammer Hospital showed a relatively high rate of apparatus failure. However, only in a few cases was this of any consequence to the patient or the operator. The survey showed that preventive maintenance reduces the failure rate and that operator training and user checks reduce the risk related to medical apparatus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Hofmann. 1997-10-10. [Medical equipment--errors, causes and risks].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9411911/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tip cooling effect and failure mechanism of field-emitting carbon nanotubes.

The cooling effect accompanying field electron emission has been considered for a single carbon nanotube (CNT) used as a field emission (FE) electron source. An improved model for the failure mechanism of field emitting CNTs has been proposed and validated. Our model predicts a maximum temperature (T-max) located at an interior point rather than the tip of the CNTs, and the failure of the CNT emitters tends to take place at the T-max point, inducing a segment by segment breakdown process. A combination of Joule heating and electrostatic force effect is proposed responsible for initiating the failure of the field emitting CNT and validated by in situ FE observation.

Equipment Failure↗

[Importance of an initial check-up for diagnostic radiology apparatus management].

The management of apparatus for diagnostic imaging is an important job for radiological technologists. In the last 10 years we have encountered 2227 malfunctions in 3652 days. We detected 163 cases at the initial check-up, which accounted for 7.3% of total cases. By performing an initial check-up, we detected one malfunction every 21 days and were able to keep the effects of mishaps to a minimum, prevent accidents, and obtain stable-quality images.

Equipment Failure↗