Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9404489

Lightness and junctions.

D Todorović
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The lightness of a test patch completely surrounded by an inducing field can be predicted by variants of Wallach's ratio rule. When a patch is surrounded by two or more regions with different luminances, a plausible extension of the ratio rule would predict that the effect of the surrounding regions should correlate with the length of the border they share with the test patch. However, as shown by the Wertheimer-Benary and White effects, lightness of such patches can depart appreciably from these predictions. It is argued that a fruitful approach toward the explanation of such effects is based on the analysis of junctions (such as T-junctions and X-junctions) between regions. Several new displays and variations of old displays involving such junctions are used to illustrate this approach. An alternative analysis of a lightness effect introduced by Adelson is provided, and the role of depth effects in achromatic perception is discussed. A number of limitations of the approach and possible ways to overcome them are noted.

Explore related subjects

Contrast SensitivityDepth PerceptionHumansLightingOptical IllusionsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Todorović. 1997. Lightness and junctions.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p260379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Statistical methods for the evaluation of diagnostic measurements concerning paired organs.

Diagnostic measurements involving paired organs may be modelled using marginal or conditional approaches. Relevant information could be ignored by using marginal models with a mean structure not including information from the fellow organ. The conditional Rosner model can be generalized to a symmetric polychotomous logistic regression model. The rather strong assumptions of the Rosner model are relaxed in this symmetric model. The use of the symmetric model is justified by its relation to discriminant analysis. Additionally, the information of the diagnostic measurements from the fellow organ is taken into account explicitly. Furthermore, in case-control studies this approach corresponds to the sampling scheme. When the status of the fellow organ and the diagnostic measurement of this organ both are available, a surprising effect may be observed; pathological values of the diagnostic measurement from the fellow organ decrease the disease probability of the selected organ. As an example, four different diagnostic procedures from the Erlangen Glaucoma Registry are investigated.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2000

Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus.

A previous study has suggested that second-order motion is ineffective at driving optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) when presented alone. First- and second-order motion cues interact in creating the perception of motion. Is there an interaction between first- and second-order cues in the control of eye movements? We presented combinations of first- and second-order cues moving in the same or opposite directions and measured the eye movements evoked, to look for a modification of the oculomotor response to first-order motion by simultaneously presented second-order cues. Dynamic random noise was used as a carrier for first- and second-order drifting gratings (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; 64 x 48 degrees screen viewed at 28.5 cm). Second-order gratings were defined by spatial modulation of the luminance flicker frequency of noise pixels of constant contrast (50%). A first-order, luminance-defined grating (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; variable contrast from 4-50%) was moved in either the same or the opposite direction. Eye movements were recorded by video-oculography from six subjects as they looked straight ahead. The gain (eye velocity/stimulus velocity) of first-order-evoked OKN increased with contrast. The presence of flicker-defined second-order motion in the opposite direction attenuated this OKN below a first-order contrast of 15%, although it had little effect at higher contrasts. When first- and second-order motion were in the same direction, there was an enhancement of the OKN response. We conclude that second-order motion can modify the optokinetic response to simultaneously presented first-order motion.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2000

The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity.

A number of authors have made the claim that dyslexia is the result of a deficit in the magnocellular part of the visual system. Most of the evidence cited in support of this claim is from contrast sensitivity studies. The present review surveys this evidence. The result of this survey shows that the support for the magnocellular deficit theory is equivocal. In the case of spatial contrast sensitivity there clearly are results that are consistent with the magnocellular deficit theory; however, these results are outnumbered both by studies that have found no loss of sensitivity and by studies that have found contrast sensitivity reductions that are inconsistent with a magnocellular deficit. Many of the studies of temporal contrast sensitivity are also difficult to reconcile with a magnocellular deficit. The evidence from studies of contrast sensitivity is therefore highly conflicting with regard to the magnocellular system deficit theory of dyslexia.

Contrast Sensitivity↗