PubMed · 9345641
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Björklund, G Yaney, J D McGarry, G Weir. 1997. Fatty acids and beta-cell function.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03168182
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) alpha and gamma are ligand-dependent transcription factors that are key regulators of lipid and carbohydrate homoeostasis. Fatty acids bind to the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of PPARalpha and PPARgamma and activate these receptors. To clarify whether fatty-acyl-CoAs interact directly with the LBDs of PPARalpha and PPARgamma, we performed a competition binding assay with radiolabelled KRP-297, a known dual agonist for these receptors. We show here that fatty-acyl-CoAs bind directly to PPARalpha and PPARgamma. Interestingly, fatty-acyl-CoAs, unlike fatty acids, failed to recruit steroid receptor co-activator 1 (SRC-1), on the basis of conformational changes in the LBDs of PPARalpha and PPARgamma. Moreover, fatty-acyl-CoAs also markedly inhibited agonist-induced recruitment of SRC-1. These findings demonstrate that fatty-acyl-CoAs have a novel function in the signalling pathways of PPARalpha and PPARgamma.
Degradation of trans-unsaturated fatty acids was studied in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Propagation of yeast cells on trans-9 elaidic acid medium resulted in transcriptional up-regulation of the SPS19 gene, whose promoter contains an oleate response element. This up-regulation depended on the Pip2p-Oaf1p transcription factor and was accompanied by induction of import-competent peroxisomes. Utilization of trans fatty acids as a single carbon and energy source was evaluated by monitoring the formation of clear zones around cell growth on turbid media containing fatty acids dispersed with Tween 80. For metabolizing odd-numbered trans double bonds, cells required the beta-oxidation auxiliary enzyme Delta(3)-Delta(2)-enoyl-CoA isomerase Eci1p. Metabolism of the corresponding even-numbered double bonds proceeded in the absence of Sps19p (2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase) and Dci1p (Delta(3,5)-Delta(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase). trans-2,trans-4-Dienoyl-CoAs could enter beta-oxidation directly via Fox2p (2-enoyl-CoA hydratase 2 and d-specific 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase) without the involvement of Sps19p, whereas trans-2,cis-4-dienoyl-CoAs could not. This reductase-independent metabolism of trans-2,trans-4-dienoyl-CoAs resembled the situation postulated for mammalian mitochondria in which oleic acid is degraded through a di-isomerase-dependent pathway. In this hypothetical process, trans-2,trans-4-dienoyl-CoA metabolites are generated by Delta(3)-Delta(2)-enoyl-CoA isomerase and Delta(3,5)-Delta(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase and are degraded by 2-enoyl-CoA hydratase 1 in the absence of 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase. Growth of a yeast fox2sps19Delta mutant in which Fox2p was exchanged with rat peroxisomal multifunctional enzyme type 1 on trans-9,trans-12 linolelaidic acid medium gave credence to this theory. We propose an amendment to the current scheme of the carbon flux through beta-oxidation taking into account the dispensability of beta-oxidation auxiliary enzymes for metabolizing trans double bonds at even-numbered positions.
Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase catalyzes the oxidation and decarboxylation of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and CO(2). Inherited defects in the protein cause glutaric acidemia type I, a fatal neurologic disease. Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase is the only member of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family with a cationic residue, Arg-94, situated in the binding site of the acyl moiety of the substrate. Crystallographic investigations suggest that Arg-94 is within hydrogen bonding distance of the gamma-carboxylate of glutaryl-CoA. Substitution of Arg-94 by glycine, a disease-causing mutation, and by glutamine, which is sterically more closely related to arginine, reduced k(cat) of the mutant dehydrogenases to 2-3% of k(cat) of the wild type enzyme. K(m) of these mutant dehydrogenases for glutaryl-CoA increases 10- to 16-fold. The steady-state kinetic constants of alternative substrates, hexanoyl-CoA and glutaramyl-CoA, which are not decarboxylated, are modestly affected by the mutations. The latter changes are probably due to steric and polar effects. The dissociation constants of the non-oxidizable substrate analogs, 3-thiaglutaryl-CoA and acetoacetyl-CoA, are not altered by the mutations. However, abstraction of a alpha-proton from 3-thiaglutaryl-CoA, to yield a charge transfer complex with the oxidized flavin, is severely limited. In contrast, abstraction of the alpha-proton of acetoacetyl-CoA by Arg-94 --> Gln mutant dehydrogenase is unaffected, and the resulting enolate forms a charge transfer complex with the oxidized flavin. These experiments indicate that Arg-94 does not make a major contribution to glutaryl-CoA binding. However, the electric field of Arg-94 may stabilize the dianions resulting from abstraction of the alpha-proton of glutaryl-CoA and 3-thiaglutaryl-CoA, both of which contain gamma-carboxylates. It is also possible that Arg-94 may orient glutaryl-CoA and 3-thiaglutaryl-CoA for abstraction of an alpha-proton.