Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9340673

[Invagination].

Abstract

Intussusception is the most common abdominal emergency in infancy and childhood. Most cases are idiopathic ileocolic intussusceptions; rarely is a lead point present. Abdominal ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for the demonstration as well as the exclusion of an intussusception. The target (transverse section) and pseudokidney (longitudinal section) signs are pathognomonic sonographic findings. Simultaneous depiction of lead points or lymph nodes or the presence of an entero-enteral intussusception may lead to different appearances. When an intussusception has been diagnosed with ultrasound, further complications such as small bowel obstruction or free intraperitoneal fluid have to be excluded at the same time. In addition, the perfusion of the intussusceptum can be evaluated with color Doppler ultrasound. There is general consensus that the only contraindications for conservative reduction are bowel perforation, peritonitis and hypovolemic shock. The oldest and most widespread method is hydrostatic reduction with barium under fluoroscopic control. Pneumatic reduction under fluoroscopic monitoring has gained more and more acceptance. An alternative technique is sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction with normal saline solution. Both latter methods are reported to have success rates of 80-90% and are clearly superior to the barium technique. In our opinion ultrasound monitoring offers the most precise control of the whole reduction process, with distinct demonstration of the intraluminal structures, especially of the ileocecal valve and of a possible lead point. A complication can be recognized immediately. The primary advantage is the lack of radiation exposure. Therefore, with appropriate equipment and experience this method may be regarded as most promising in the management of intussusception in infancy and childhood.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Rohrschneider. 1997. [Invagination].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001170050237

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Intraabdominal hemangiopericytoma. Diagnosed during surgery for suspected acute appendicitis].

A 39 year-old febrile man with lower abdominal pain and peritoneal reaction was operated on suspicion of acute appendicitis. During the past eighteen months he had been hospitalized twice due to similar symptoms, both times with spontaneous remission. The operative finding was a large multilobular vascular tumour which on pathological examination was a haemangiopericytoma, with no degree of malignancy. The tumour was removed in toto.

Abdomen, Acute

[Obstructive cholangiopathy: are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and papillotomy always really necessary?].

In two women aged 76 and 29 years, who presented with cholangitis and small ductus choledochus calculi and with painless icterus respectively, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was carried out with papillotomy. Both developed a duodenal perforation which, however, could not be localized. The first patient eventually died, the second recovered after prolonged hospitalization. A third patient, a 53-year-old man, developed abdominal pain and fever four days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ERCP was planned, but in the meantime the patient showed signs of recovery. The ERCP was carried out nevertheless. It failed and the patient suffered a prolonged recovery with necrotizing pancreatitis and multiple operations necessitating a temporary colostoma. In all three patients the endoscopic procedure was performed routinely without strict individualized indication. ERCP and papillotomy may be relatively safe procedures, but it should always be considered whether they will really serve the patient.

Abdomen, Acute