Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9340228

[Risk assessment].

Abstract

The aim of preoperative risk analysis is to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality by identification of compromised organ function which can be improved by targeted preoperative measures and problem-oriented postoperative therapy. Ideally, therefore, preoperative risk assessment, influences the timing of the surgical procedure, the choice of the surgical approach, and the postoperative management. Identification of preexisting relevant disorders that may influence the postoperative course is an essential prerequisite of risk analysis. While preoperative risk analysis today gains in importance with the increasing extent of elective surgical procedures, preoperative risk evaluation still plays a minor role in the emergency situation when the given patient-dependent risk usually has to be accepted. Objective risk evaluation depends on the general and nutritional status, the pulmonary, cardio-vascular, hepatic, and renal function, and the cooperation of the patient. These factors, however, clearly have to be seen in relation to the type and extent of the planned surgical procedure. The selection of additional tests of organ function, exceeding the standard tests required prior to any surgical intervention, must be guided by the extent of the planned surgical procedure, the physiologic alterations associated with the surgical procedure, and the suspected underlying organ dysfunction. Generally accepted multi-factorial classification systems to identify patients at risk for a wide spectrum of surgical procedures are currently not available. Using the model of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer we could, however, demonstrate that a quantitative assessment of the peri- and postoperative risk based on preoperatively available physiologic parameters is possible and markedly reduces postoperative mortality when applied prospectively. The development and validation of similar risk-score systems for other surgical procedures should be considered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Bartels, H J Stein, A Schömig, J R Siewert. 1997. [Risk assessment].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001040050249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗