Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9338100

The anaphase promoting complex.

Abstract

We have proposed a preliminary model of how the anaphase promoting complex functions throughout the cell cycle, but despite the flurry of recent publications characterizing the APC--its components, regulation and substrate specificity--many fundamental questions remain to be answered. Firstly, the remaining components of the APC need to be identified and characterized. We do not know if all cyclosome components are conserved in all eukaryotes, or if higher eukaryotes, having a more complicated cell cycle machinery, maintain additional subunits for more sophisticated functional and regulatory control. In addition, we need to determine the identity of the various kinases and phosphatases that regulate the APC itself. The biochemistry of individual APC components is also a mystery, and a specific biochemical function has not been assigned to any known members of the complex. It is not at all clear which subunit(s) of the complex actually recognizes the E2 enzyme and which subunit(s) recognizes the cyclin destruction box. It is likely that many cyclosome substrates remain to be identified, and it will be interesting to determine whether all cyclosome substrates require a destruction box for their degradation or whether the APC recognizes other determinants of protein instability. Finally, we assume that the APC degrades mitotic cyclins in all proliferating cells, but whether it degrades unique cell cycle related substrates in specific tissues is unclear. Furthermore, nothing is known about APC function during meiosis, or whether the APC degrades other substrates that are not related to the cell cycle. This is an exciting and rapidly developing field in the exciting world of cell cycle biology. We expect that new findings will surely reveal many interesting surprises about this essential protein complex.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Page, P Hieter. 1997. The anaphase promoting complex.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9338100/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Incorporation of Drosophila CID/CENP-A and CENP-C into centromeres during early embryonic anaphase.

The centromere/kinetochore complex is indispensable for accurate segregation of chromosomes during cell divisions when it serves as the attachment site for spindle microtubules. Centromere identity in metazoans is believed to be governed by epigenetic mechanisms, because the highly repetitive centromeric DNA is neither sufficient nor required for specifying the assembly site of the kinetochore. A candidate for an epigenetic mark is the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A that replaces H3 in alternating blocks of chromatin exclusively in active centromeres. CENP-A acts as an initiator of kinetochore assembly, but the detailed dynamics of the deposition of metazoan CENP-A and of other constitutive kinetochore components are largely unknown. Here we show by quantitative fluorescence measurements in living early embryos that functional fluorescent fusion proteins of the Drosophila CENP-A and CENP-C homologs are rapidly incorporated into centromeres during anaphase. This incorporation is independent of ongoing DNA synthesis and pulling forces generated by the mitotic spindle, but strictly coupled to mitotic progression. Thus, our findings uncover a strikingly dynamic behavior of centromere components in anaphase.

Anaphase↗

LET-99, GOA-1/GPA-16, and GPR-1/2 are required for aster-positioned cytokinesis.

At anaphase, the mitotic spindle positions the cytokinesis furrow [1]. Two populations of spindle microtubules are implicated in cytokinesis: radial microtubule arrays called asters and bundled nonkinetochore microtubules called the spindle midzone [2-4]. In C. elegans embryos, these two populations of microtubules provide two consecutive signals that position the cytokinesis furrow: The first signal is positioned midway between the microtubule asters; the second signal is positioned over the spindle midzone [5]. Evidence for two cytokinesis signals came from the identification of molecules that block midzone-positioned cytokinesis [5-7]. However, no molecules that are only required for, and thus define, the molecular pathway of aster-positioned cytokinesis have been identified. With RNAi screening, we identify LET-99 and the heterotrimeric G proteins GOA-1/GPA-16 and their regulator GPR-1/2 [10-12] in aster-positioned cytokinesis. By using mechanical spindle displacement, we show that the anaphase spindle positions cortical LET-99, at the site of the presumptive cytokinesis furrow. LET-99 enrichment at the furrow depends on the G proteins. GPR-1 is locally reduced at the site of cytokinesis-furrow formation by LET-99, which prevents accumulation of GPR-1 at this site. We conclude that LET-99 and the G proteins define a molecular pathway required for aster-positioned cytokinesis.

Anaphase↗

Retinoblastoma protein and anaphase-promoting complex physically interact and functionally cooperate during cell-cycle exit.

The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) negatively regulates the progression from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle, in part, by repressing E2F-dependent transcription. pRB also possesses E2F-independent functions that contribute to cell-cycle control--for example, during pRB-mediated cell-cycle arrest pRB associates with Skp2, the F-box protein of the Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, and promotes the stability of the cyclin-dependent kinase-inhibitor p27(Kip1) through an unknown mechanism. Degradation of p27(Kip1) is mediated by ubiquitin-dependent targeting of p27(Kip1) by SCF -Skp2 (ref. 4). Here, we report a novel interaction between pRB and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) that controls p27(Kip1) stability by targeting Skp2 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Cdh1, an activator of APC/C, not only interacts with pRB but is also required for a pRB-induced cell-cycle arrest. The results reveal an unexpected physical convergence between the pRB tumour-suppressor protein and E3 ligase complexes, and raise the possibility that pRB may direct APC/C to additional targets during pRB-mediated cell-cycle exit.

Anaphase↗