Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9337487

How do bacteria avoid high oxygen concentrations?

Abstract

Bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Azospirillum brasilense, avoid microenvironments with elevated oxygen concentrations, not by sensing reactive oxygen derivatives, but by sensing a metabolic down-shift that results from elevated oxygen levels. A novel protein, Aer, and the chemotaxis serine receptor, Tsr, have recently been identified as transducers for aerotaxis which monitor internal energy levels in the bacteria.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I B Zhulin, M S Johnson, B L Taylor. 1997. How do bacteria avoid high oxygen concentrations?. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1027340813657

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modelling the survival of bacteria in drylands: the advantage of being dormant.

We introduce a simple mathematical model for the description of 'dormancy', a survival strategy used by some bacterial populations that are intermittently exposed to external stress. We focus on the case of the cyanobacterial crust in drylands, exposed to severe water shortage, and compare the fate of ideal populations that are, respectively, capable or incapable of becoming dormant. The results of the simple model introduced here indicate that under a constant, even though low, supply of water the dormant strategy does not provide any benefit and it can, instead, decrease the chances of survival of the population. The situation is reversed for highly intermittent external stress, due to the presence of prolonged periods of dry conditions intermingled with short periods of intense precipitation. In this case, dormancy allows for the survival of the population during the dry periods. In contrast, bacteria that are incapable of turning into a dormant state cannot overcome the difficult times. The model also rationalizes why dormant bacteria, such as those composing the cyanobacterial crust in the desert, are extremely sensitive to other disturbances, such as trampling cattle.

Bacterial Physiological Phenomena↗

Osmoregulation and its importance to food-borne microorganisms.

The control of water activity has been used as a means of preserving foods for thousands of years. This preservation strategy presents food-borne microorganisms with serious problems, many of which relate to the management of water flow. Although the specific details of how each organism deals with these problems are different, several common themes have emerged. Bacteria induce specific responses. both physiological and genetic, to respond to either the loss or the gain of water, triggered by changes in the osmolarity of the environment. Many of the key systems have now been identified and the mechanisms of their regulation are beginning to be understood. Here we review recent developments in the field of bacterial osmoregulation with emphasis on key food-borne genera.

Bacterial Physiological Phenomena↗

Phototrophic consortia: model systems for symbiotic interrelations between prokaryotes.

Most symbiotic prokaryotes known to date have been found in association with eukaryotes, whereas only few (3.5%) bacteria or archaea are known that have established interactions with other prokaryotes. As revealed by direct microscopic investigations, however, multiple morphotypes of highly structured associations of different prokaryotes exist in nature. These so-called consortia appear to represent the most developed type of bacterial interaction. Phototrophic consortia are associations of green sulfur bacteria that surround a central chemotrophic bacterium. In some natural environments, almost all cells of green sulfur bacteria occur in the associated state, i.e. as epibionts of phototrophic consortia. In contrast to earlier speculations, the central bacterium belongs to the beta-Proteobacteria. Within the consortia, the green sulfur bacterial epibionts grow photolithoautotrophically, utilizing exogenous sulfide as photosynthetic electron donor. The entire consortium does not appear to be independent of organic carbon compounds, since it exhibits chemotaxis towards 2-oxoglutarate and, as demonstrated by microautoradiography, can also incorporate this compound. Intact consortia exhibit a scotophobic response in which the bacteriochlorophylls of the epibionts function as light sensors, whereas the chemotrophic central bacterium confers motility upon the association. Hence, a signal exchange must occur between the different bacteria. Based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences, the epibionts represent distinct phylotypes that are often only distantly related to known species of green sulfur bacteria. Since phototrophic consortia have recently become available in enrichment cultures, they can now serve as suitable model systems for the investigation of the molecular mechanisms of cell-cell recognition and signal exchange, and for studies of the coevolution of nonrelated prokaryotes.

Bacterial Physiological Phenomena↗