PubMed · 9332061
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E A Melamed, C Zinman. 1997. [Mangled extremity syndrome].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9332061/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Injuries and diseases of the hand naturally have an enormous impact on hand function and on quality of life, both occupational and social. The majority of hand-injury patients are under 30 years of age. Hand surgery, an established specialty in Sweden since 1969, is of great importance in terms of clinical developments, education and research. In the coming decade, scientific and clinical advances are to be expected in several fields such as nerve injuries including brachial plexus lesion, microsurgery, flexor tendon injuries and tendon transfer. Bioimplant research and new advances at the biotechnological interface will yield new options in nerve reconstruction, microchip implants in the nervous system, and the restoration of muscle-tendon function following injury. Artificial limbs with advanced motor and sensory functions will be important future aids in the rehabilitation of amputees. Transplantation of human hands is another promising reconstructive procedure which may open up new perspectives in the coming millennium.
Intracortical microstimulation was used to investigate the organization of primate primary motor cortex (M1) in three squirrel monkeys and two galagos years after the therapeutic amputation of an injured forelimb or hindlimb. In two squirrel monkeys with forelimb amputation, physiological results were correlated with the distribution of corticospinal neurons after injections of tracers into the lower cervical segments of the spinal cord. Distributions of labeled corticospinal neurons helped identify the locations of the former forelimb cortex in M1. Evoked movements from M1 ipsilateral to the missing limb were not obviously different from M1 of normal controls. Stimulation in the deefferented part of M1 contralateral to the missing limb elicited movements of the remaining proximal muscles as well as movements from adjacent body representations in all cases. Stimulation in the deefferented forelimb cortex evoked shoulder stump, trunk, and orofacial movements, whereas stimulation in the deefferented hindlimb cortex evoked hip stump, trunk, and tail movements. Movements were evoked from all sites in the deprived cortex, so that there were no unresponsive zones. Minimal levels of current necessary to evoke these movements varied from those in the normal range to those of much higher levels, with the average threshold higher than normal. Finally, multiunit recording from the two galagos revealed that the deprived portions of S1 were responsive to touch or taps on the stump and neighboring body parts.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.