Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9327061

Computing stereo channels from masking data.

Abstract

The detection of stereoscopic depth in random-dot patterns that have been spatially band-pass filtered is adversely affected by the addition of noise at spatial frequencies in the neighbourhood of the frequencies present in the stereogram. This elevation of threshold is generally termed masking and recent data have been interpreted as evidence for a pair of spatial-frequency-tuned stereo "channels" whose peak spatial frequencies are either at 3 and 5 c/deg or 2.5 and 7 c/deg. This interpretation was re-examined. In particular, we have studied how the characteristics of masking interactions might be affected by taking account of the presence of an initial modulation transfer function (including the optical m.t.f. of the eye) that precedes the stage at which signal and mask interact. Using this approach, we reach the conclusion that the peak of the internal masking function for stereo detection coincides with the signal spatial frequency over the whole range tested (1.7-11.6 c/deg). We conclude that the recent data of Yang and Blake [(1991). Vision Research, 31, 1177-1189] are consistent with a multiple channel model in much the form proposed by Julesz and Miller [(1975). Perception, 4, 125-143]. The analysis presented in this paper has general implications for the interpretation of masking studies in spatial contrast vision.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Glennerster, A J Parker. 1997. Computing stereo channels from masking data.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00036-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The motor side of depth vision.

To achieve stereoscopic vision, the brain must search for corresponding image features on the two retinas. As long as the eyes stay still, corresponding features are confined to narrow bands called epipolar lines. But when the eyes change position, the epipolar lines migrate on the retinas. To find the matching features, the brain must either search different retinal bands depending on current eye position, or search retina-fixed zones that are large enough to cover all usual locations of the epipolar lines. Here we show, using a new type of stereogram in which the depth image vanishes at certain gaze elevations, that the search zones are retina-fixed. This being the case, motor control acquires a crucial function in depth vision: we show that the eyes twist about their lines of sight in a way that reduces the motion of the epipolar lines, allowing stereopsis to get by with smaller search zones and thereby lightening its computational load.

Depth Perception↗

Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching.

The spatial differences between the images seen by the two eyes, called binocular disparities, can be used to recover the volumetric (three-dimensional) aspects of a scene. The computation of disparity depends upon the correct identification of corresponding features in the two images. Understanding what image features are used by the brain to solve this matching problem is one of the main issues in stereoscopic vision. Many cortical neurons in visual areas V1 (ref. 2), MT (refs 3, 4) and MST (refs 5, 6) that are tuned to binocular disparity are also tuned to orientation, motion direction and speed. Although psychophysical work has shown that motion direction can facilitate binocular matching, the psychophysical literature on the role of orientation is mixed, and it has been argued that speed differences are ineffective in aiding correspondence. Here we use a different psychophysical paradigm to show that the visual system uses similarities in orientation, motion direction and speed to achieve binocular correspondence. These results indicate that cells that multiplex orientation, motion direction, speed and binocular disparity may help to solve the binocular matching problem.

Depth Perception↗

Phantom surface captures stereopsis.

A phantom surface is a stereoscopic illusory area that can be seen in depth although there is no conventional stereoscopic cues [Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., & Schor, C.M. (1994). Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence. Nature, 367, 66-69; Gillam, B. & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research, 39, 109-112]. The phenomenon has been explained as an example of half-occlusion processing in which the visual system uses information about cyclopean occlusion structure of the visual world. We created stereo capture stereograms in which phantom surfaces changed the perceived depth of conventionally defined binocular textures. Because conventional stereoscopic matching is strongly affected by half-occlusion processing, we suggest that half-occlusion processing is an integral part of the early stereoscopic processing and solving of the correspondence problem.

Depth Perception↗