PubMed · 9274593
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
U C Wieshmann, M R Symms, S D Shorvon. 1997-08-16. Diffusion changes in status epilepticus.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63083-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
DNA packaging into heterochromatin is a fundamental mechanism of transcriptional silencing, yet its role in regulating neural progenitor behavior during brain development remains poorly understood. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3), catalyzed by the methyltransferases SETDB1, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2, is a defining feature of heterochromatin, but functional redundancy among these enzymes has obscured their developmental roles. Here, we generated a cortex-specific triple knockout mouse model lacking Setdb1, Suv39h1, and Suv39h2 to directly interrogate H3K9me3 function during corticogenesis. Combined loss of H3K9 methyltransferases caused genome-wide depletion of H3K9me3, disruption of neural progenitor cell-cycle progression, and impaired cortical neurogenesis, resulting in microcephaly. H3K9 methyltransferases preserve neural progenitor identity and function by silencing clustered protocadherins, meiosis-associated genes, and a cell-cycle restraint program through H3K9me3 deposition. Loss of H3K9me3 promoted local chromatin opening and increased transcription factor occupancy, enabling transposable elements to acquire cryptic enhancer activity and modulate proximal gene expression. Together, these findings establish H3K9me3 heterochromatin as an active regulator of neural progenitor dynamics and lineage fidelity, revealing a central epigenetic mechanism that restricts aberrant transcriptional programs to ensure cortical growth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We used event-related functional MRI to investigate the neural bases of two categories of mental processes believed to contribute to performance of an alphabetization working memory task: memory storage and memory manipulation. Our delayed-response tasks required memory for the identity and position-in-the-display of items in two- or five-letter memory sets (to identify load-sensitive regions) or memory for the identity and relative position-in-the-alphabet of items in five-letter memory sets (to identify manipulation-sensitive regions). Results revealed voxels in the left perisylvian cortex of five of five subjects showing load sensitivity (as contrasted with alphabetization-sensitive voxels in this region in only one subject) and voxels of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in all subjects showing alphabetization sensitivity (as contrasted with load-sensitive voxels in this region in two subjects). This double dissociation was reliable at the group level. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the nonmnemonic executive control processes that can contribute to working memory function are primarily prefrontal cortex-mediated whereas mnemonic processes necessary for working memory storage are primarily posteriorly mediated. More broadly, they support the view that working memory is a faculty that arises from the coordinated interaction of computationally and neuroanatomically dissociable processes.