Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9262975

Do patients with systemic sclerosis have abnormal gallbladder function?

W F Posthuma·M Ledeboer·A A Masclee·B A Dijkmans·R G Westendorp·M C Jebbink·F C Breedveld·C B Lamers
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine gallbladder motility in patients with systemic sclerosis. DESIGN: Case control study. SETTING: University hospital, out-patient department of rheumatology. PATIENTS: Ten patients with systemic sclerosis according to the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association with documented involvement of the gastrointestinal tract and 10 healthy controls matched for age, sex and body mass index. INTERVENTION: Cephalic vagal cholinergic simulation by modified sham feeding and hormonal stimulation by infusion of cholecystokinin. MEASUREMENTS: Gallbladder volume obtained by ultrasonography and determination of plasma cholecystokinin concentrations. RESULTS: Fasting gallbladder volumes were not significantly different between patients with systemic sclerosis and controls (19.6 +/- 1.9 cm3 and 23.3 +/- 2.9 cm3, respectively, mean plus or minus standard error of the mean). Neither were there significant differences in reduction of gallbladder volume in response to modified sham feeding (35 +/- 4% and 33 +/- 4%, respectively) nor during cholecystokinin infusion (56 +/- 4% and 60 +/- 6%, respectively). The increase in plasma cholecystokinin levels during infusion was not different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder motility in patients with systemic sclerosis is preserved in response to both cholinergic and hormonal stimulation, even when other gastrointestinal motor disturbances are present. These results suggest that patients with systemic sclerosis are not at increased risk for cholelithiasis because of gallbladder dysmotility.

Explore related subjects

Case-Control StudiesCholecystokininFastingFemaleGallbladderHumansMaleOrgan SizeScleroderma, SystemicUltrasonographyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W F Posthuma, M Ledeboer, A A Masclee, B A Dijkmans, R G Westendorp, M C Jebbink, F C Breedveld, C B Lamers. 1997. Do patients with systemic sclerosis have abnormal gallbladder function?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199707000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Control of confounding through secondary samples.

The control of confounding is essential in many statistical problems, especially in those that attempt to estimate exposure effects. In some cases, in addition to the 'primary' sample, there is another 'secondary' sample which, though having no direct information about the exposure effect, contains information about the confounding factors. The purpose of this article is to study the influence of the secondary sample on likelihood inference for the exposure effect. In particular, we investigate the interplay between the efficiency improvement and the possible bias introduced by the secondary sample as a function of the degree of confounding in the primary sample and the sizes of the primary and secondary samples. In the case of weak confounding, the secondary sample can only little improve estimation of the exposure effect, whereas with strong confounding the secondary sample can be much more useful. On the other hand, it will be more important to consider possible biasing effects in the latter case. For illustration, we use a formal example of a generalized linear model and a real example with sparse data from a case-control study of the association between gastric cancer and HM-CAP/Band 120.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2006

On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.

The Cochran-Armitage trend test has been used in case-control studies for testing genetic association. As the variance of the test statistic is a function of unknown parameters, e.g. disease prevalence and allele frequency, it must be estimated. The usual estimator combining data for cases and controls assumes they follow the same distribution under the null hypothesis. Under the alternative hypothesis, however, the cases and controls follow different distributions. Thus, the power of the trend tests may be affected by the variance estimator used. In particular, the usual method combining both cases and controls is not an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the null variance when the alternative is true. Two different estimates of the null variance are available which are consistent under both the null and alternative hypotheses. In this paper, we examine sample size and small sample power performance of trend tests, which are optimal for three common genetic models as well as a robust trend test based on the three estimates of the variance and provide guidelines for choosing an appropriate test.

Case-Control Studies↗