Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9251594

Monitoring steroid use in a field program; possible process indicators.

Abstract

Two new indicators are proposed in order to make the task of monitoring certain prevention of disability (POD) activities more straightforward. The indicators are very similar to the case detection rates and the cohort analyses already used in both leprosy and tuberculosis (TB) control; this makes them very simple to put into practice. Despite their simplicity, it is argued that these indicators can give important information about the implementation of POD activities in a routine field program and could, therefore, help in improving the quality of those services to patients. The indicators are the steroid start rate (SSR) and the steroid completion rate (SCR). A number of possible confounding factors have been looked at and they are not negligible. However, the case detection rates for new cases of leprosy and treatment completion rates for multidrug therapy (MDT) are subject to similar biases, which are well recognized and which have not detracted from the usefulness of these indicators in evaluating leprosy control activities. The POD indicators, if used with an awareness of the possible biases involved, can help to improve the quality of certain POD activities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P R Saunderson, N Haile-Mariam. 1997. Monitoring steroid use in a field program; possible process indicators.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9251594/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗