Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9231477

Endometrial sampling and general practice.

M Shapley·C W Redman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Endometrial sampling is an 'office' technique that has gained widespread acceptance in the United States (US). It is as accurate as dilatation and curettage (D&C) in the diagnosis of endometrial atypia and carcinoma. It appears to be the most suitable method of endometrial assessment for general practice. It has the potential for the earlier detection of endometrial abnormality and for increasing the number of women with abnormal vaginal bleeding who can be wholly managed within primary care. However, research is lacking on the effect of the widespread introduction of the technique into general practice. This paper puts forward recommendations for the use of endometrial sampling by general practitioners (GPs) based on current evidence.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHysteroscopyPractice Guidelines as TopicUltrasonographyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Shapley, C W Redman. 1997. Endometrial sampling and general practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9231477/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗