Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9217691

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Patients with multiple sclerosis who develop progressive disability from onset without relapses or remissions pose difficulties in diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity and treatment. There is a need to define the diagnostic criteria for this group more precisely and, in particular, to describe a comprehensive battery of investigations to exclude other conditions. The mechanisms underlying the development of disability and the role of MRI in monitoring disease activity in this clinical subgroup require elucidation, particularly in view of the lack of change on conventional imaging in the presence of continuing clinical deterioration. The prognosis is poor and there are currently no treatment trials for this form of the disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Thompson, C H Polman, D H Miller, W I McDonald, B Brochet, X Filippi M Montalban, J De Sá. 1997. Primary progressive multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain%2F120.6.1085

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

CONTEXT: In men who develop an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level (PSA) after having undergone a radical prostatectomy, the natural history of progression to distant metastases and death due to prostate cancer is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the time course of disease progression in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective review of a large surgical series with median (SD) follow-up of 5.3 (3.7) years (range, 0.5-15 years) between April 1982 and April 1997. SETTING: An urban academic tertiary referral institution. PATIENTS: A total of 1997 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, by a single surgeon, for clinically localized prostate cancer. None received neoadjuvant therapy, and none had received adjuvant hormonal therapy prior to documented distant metastases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After surgery, men were followed up with PSA assays and digital rectal examinations every 3 months for the first year, semiannually for the second year, and annually thereafter. A detectable serum PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL was evidence of biochemical recurrence. Distant metastases were diagnosed by radionuclide bone scan, chest radiograph, or other body imaging, which was performed at the time of biochemical recurrence and annually thereafter. RESULTS: The actuarial metastasis-free survival for all 1997 men was 82% (95% confidence interval, 76%-88%) at 15 years after surgery. Of the 1997 men, 315 (15%) developed biochemical PSA level elevation. Eleven of these underwent early hormone therapy after the recurrence and are not included in the study. Of the remaining 304 men, 103 (34%) developed metastatic disease within the study period. The median actuarial time to metastases was 8 years from the time of PSA level elevation. In survival analysis, time to biochemical progression (P<.001), Gleason score (P<.001), and PSA doubling time (P<.001) were predictive of the probability and time to the development of metastatic disease. An algorithm combining these parameters was constructed to stratify men into risk groups. Once men developed metastatic disease, the median actuarial time to death was 5 years. The time interval from surgery to the appearance of metastatic disease was predictive of time until death (P<.02). CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical parameters help predict the outcomes of men with PSA elevation after radical prostatectomy. These data may be useful in the design of clinical trials, the identification of men for enrollment into experimental protocols, and counseling men regarding the timing of administration of adjuvant therapies.

Disease Progression